On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:02, Andreas Pretzsch wrote:
> So how to proceed with the sspi command ?
i think any proposals pending for the sspi command could be handled
with a better hush implementation, so i'd prefer to go that route as
the "bigger picture"
> Also, given any rework of the sspi com
Am Donnerstag, den 21.07.2011, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Hi Mike,
>
> [...]
>
> >> Following the common U-Boot way to do this, I'd suggest
> >>sspi [:][.] [din_env_var]
> >> and either never print the read result to the console (my favorite) or
> >> only if no env variable to sto
> -Original Message-
> From: Ajay Bhargav [mailto:ajay.bhar...@einfochips.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:34 PM
> To: Lei Wen
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: Add GPIO driver for Marvell
> SoC Armada100
>
> Hi Lei,
> Thank yo
Hi
I left Netstal Maschinen a couple of months ago and found a part time job at
another company (www.solcept.ch) where some of its customers use U-Boot and
linux for their products. Beside that I am working free-lance on a free
software project (www.elexis.ch, An Eclipse RCP program for all asp
Recieve/Receive
recieve/receive
Interupt/Interrupt
interupt/interrupt
Addres/Address
addres/address
Signed-off-by: Mike Williams
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/lpc2292/mmc_hw.c |4 ++--
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S |2 +-
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/timer.c
Hi Albert,
since I think we have now resolved the remaining issue with the
build system I'm reiterating this pull request.
Changes from last time:
- MAINTAINERS change also covers me taking over the integratorcp
board
- Build the integratorap/cp variants using boards.cfg configuration
The late
Hi wd,
Thanks for the reply. Helped me a lot.
However see below
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 18:41:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "Hebbar, Gururaja",
>
> In message you
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The question here is mmc_args re-uses variable bootargs as
> > $(bootargs) & nand_args re-uses it as ${b
Hi Lei,
Thank you for confirming.
> What do you mean by "changed back to Armada100 gpio"?
>
Well just incase GPIO register set is different for different archs
this current driver need to be renamed as armada100 gpio.
So if other Marvell SoCs are having similar register set then we can
have a c
Hi Ajay,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Ajay Bhargav
wrote:
> Hi Lei,
>
>> I think if have no such same structure, the gpio driver may need to be
>> rewrite,
>> since the meaning of the register may also change.
>>
> so should this be changed back to Armada100 gpio? How bout mmp3, is it having
您好!
本公司是一家拥有进出口报关等一切出口单证代理公司，有着丰富的
出口经验和优势的价格，可以 为贵公司代理以下出口业务
1.提供核销单（报关单）
2.CO产地证. 普惠证(FA,FE,FF,亚太,中巴，大使馆签等)
3.买单报关，商检，拖车
4.实力报关,
请存留备用，欢迎你的来电咨询：
联系人：张先生 联系电话：0755-25420177 手机：13686868548
QQ：122062143 邮箱：szyongdongjia...@163.com 122062...@qq.com
Hi Lei,
> I think if have no such same structure, the gpio driver may need to be
> rewrite,
> since the meaning of the register may also change.
>
so should this be changed back to Armada100 gpio? How bout mmp3, is it having
same register set?
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
__
Dear Nick Thompson,
In message <4e293329.9050...@ge.com> you wrote:
>
> > Could you tell us how to modify u-boot to use UART1 for its console?
>
> $ grep UART include/configs/da830evm.h
> #define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1 DAVINCI_UART2_BASE /* Base address of UART2 */
> #define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_C
Don,
Please ask u-boot questions on the u-boot mailing list.
On 22/07/11 01:03, Don McCune wrote:
>
> We are bringing up a board based on the OMAPL137 processor. The board is
> similar to the Spectrum Digital Evm board; however it has used UART2 for
> something else, so we need to make UAR1 th
The following changes since commit 74fac70084bb040342fafc3b0d2ef50fbe35646f:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mmc (2011-07-19 22:27:07
+0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master
Becky Bruce (2):
powerpc/mpc85xx: Add cle
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Ajay Bhargav
wrote:
> Hi Lei,
>
>> Why not put this structure into driver file?
>> I think this register is not easy to change, and put this into arch
>> .h
>> would make the work duplicated,
>> as each arch need to redefine the same structure again.
>>
> Other arc
Hi Lei,
> Why not put this structure into driver file?
> I think this register is not easy to change, and put this into arch
> .h
> would make the work duplicated,
> as each arch need to redefine the same structure again.
>
Other architectures may/may not have the same structure. One can redefine
Hi Ajay,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Ajay Bhargav
wrote:
> This patch adds support for generic GPIO driver framework for Marvell
> SoC Armada100.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/armada100.h | 4 +
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/gpio.h
This patch adds support for generic GPIO driver framework for Marvell
SoC Armada100.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/armada100.h |4 +
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/gpio.h | 95 +++
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 0 dele
This patch adds generic GPIO driver framework support for Marvell SoCs.
To enable GPIO driver define CONFIG_MARVELL_GPIO and for GPIO commands
define CONFIG_CMD_GPIO in your board configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
---
drivers/gpio/Makefile |1 +
drivers/gpio/mvgpio.c | 114 ++
Hi Prafulla,
> I don't mind if you merge these two patches, any future support will
> add gpio.h
>
Let them be separate easy to track changes :)
I will be sending updated patches.
Regards,
Ajay Bhargav
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
> -Original Message-
> From: Ajay Bhargav [mailto:ajay.bhar...@einfochips.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:08 AM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Add GPIO driver framework for Marvell
> SoCs
>
> Hi Prafulla,
>
> Thank you so much f
21 matches
Mail list logo
