Hello Andreas,
Thanks for this explanation.
I will try to write my own driver for my board.
Best regards
alex
On 02/10/2011 07:24 PM, Andreas Pretzsch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 17:04 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Gambier:
>> Dear Wolfgang,
>>
>> I tried to put some printk in the MTD dri
Hi Albert,
On Friday 11 February 2011 12:09 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 11/02/2011 07:28, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> Hello Wolfgang, Albert,
>>
>> On Saturday 05 February 2011 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi Aneesh,
>>>
>>> Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>>
On se
Hi Aneesh,
Le 11/02/2011 07:28, Aneesh V a écrit :
> Hello Wolfgang, Albert,
>
> On Saturday 05 February 2011 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>
>>> On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With
>>> MMC and FAT sup
Hello Wolfgang, Albert,
On Saturday 05 February 2011 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit :
>
>> On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With
>> MMC and FAT support, the SPL is already nearing the IRAM budget in
>> OMAP3. I
Some fixes for v2011.03:
The following changes since commit 494a7d215bfba17f1a94736df40c332c8713c30e:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx master
Kumar Gala (1):
hi ...
I am using p2020 processor. Accessed through mmc. But disk throughput is
very less. Its less than 1 MBps .. can some one suggest me how to improve
the disk throughput
regards
Souravs
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-U-boot--Slow-microsd-access-through-MMC-in-
On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> From: Priyanka Jain
>
> Board EEPROM is used to read/save Ethernet MAC addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
> include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h |3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
a
On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> We should have been defining the actual board name in the options, not
> the processor. Fix this for P1011RDB, P1020RDB, P2010RDB, and P2020RDB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
> boards.cfg | 26 +-
> 1 files changed
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:27:12 pm Aaron Williams wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:24:54 pm Aaron Williams wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:08:01 am Andrew Dyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:28, Aaron Williams
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> I would suggest to
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:24:54 pm Aaron Williams wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:08:01 am Andrew Dyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:28, Aaron Williams
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> I would suggest to make sure any caching/prefetching stuff is off,
> > >> hardware is doing one
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 07:08:01 am Andrew Dyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:28, Aaron Williams
>
> wrote:
> >> I would suggest to make sure any caching/prefetching stuff is off,
> >> hardware is doing one flash bus access per CPU read/write.
> >>
> >> In cmdset_amd_read_jedec_ids(
Hi there
How are you doing over there?! 2011 off to a good start?!
We're pleased to inform you that your organisation has been invited to
participate in the exclusive Art of England Magazine, April 2011 edition, copy
deadline for which is almost here.
Now seven years old, the Art of England Ma
23GBCurrent grandezza massima. La tua quota Webmail ha superato il
contingente / 20GB.You limite che è attualmente in esecuzione sul 23 GB
a causa di file nascosti e cartelle sulla tua casella. account di posta
che non funziona in modo da creare più spazio per un nuovo utente.
pertanto si è di
Le 09/02/2011 22:01, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> Le 09/02/2011 10:49, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
>> Hi Albert/Wolfgang
>>
>> Please pull
>>
>> The following changes since commit 97a85b223ab316d11f3a374fecc5d449a1c8a694:
>> Scott Wood (1):
>> powerpc/nand spl: link libgcc
>>
>> are ava
* update arm920t/at91 to ATMEL_xxx name scheme
* convert at91rm9200ek and eb_cpux9k2 board to ATMEL_xxx name scheme
* update arm920t/at91 soc lib
* update at91_emac driver
Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
---
The eb_cpux9k2 board can compile and runs after patch changes
The at91rm9200ek can compile,
Dear Marcel,
In message <201102102015.59437.korg...@home.nl> you wrote:
>
> The GPBR is optional in my code. I just use it because it's the nicest
> solution for me over the following options :
I haven't seen your code yet, so I may misunderstand what you are
actually referring to, but from what
Dear Wolfgang,
> In message <201102100846.49072.korg...@home.nl> you wrote:
> > I did create a new command "dfu" that activates the controller and DFU.
> > I than used the GPBR register of the AT91 to make u-boot know that it has
> > to activate DFU by script. Basically the value of the GPBR regi
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 17:04 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Gambier:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> I tried to put some printk in the MTD driver and it seems that the
> parse_mtd_partitions function is never called...
parse_mtd_partitions() is called from the mapping drivers. See e.g.
linux/drivers/mtd/m
When DDR data rate is higher than 1200MT/s or controller interleaving is
enabled, additional cycle for write-to-read turnaround is needed to satisfy
dynamic ODT timing.
Signed-off-by: York Sun
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c |3 +++
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ddr.h |
hi
On 02/10/2011 05:24 PM, Andy Pont wrote:
> Michael wrote...
>
>>> If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot
> is
>>> it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>>
>> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual
> mapping
>> and
Hi,
After a few days of work I managed to compile u-boot for the at91sam9263ek
board. I will do some testing (and probably debugging) now to see if the code
works. Once this is the case I can send the patches. Then 1 driver still needs
upgrade to c-structure SoC access.
Uli
_
Michael wrote...
> > If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot
is
> > it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>
> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual
mapping
> and parameter passing
Are you prepared to share them and I
Dear Wolfgang,
I tried to put some printk in the MTD driver and it seems that the
parse_mtd_partitions function is never called...
I will try to find what's wrong with my kernel configuration.
alex
On 02/10/2011 03:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Alexandre Gambier,
>
> In message<4d53f9fa.20
Dear Alexandre Gambier,
In message <4d53f9fa.2070...@ftemaximal.fr> you wrote:
>
> mtdids : nor0=NOR,nand0=NAND
...
> mtdparts=NOR:512k(U-Boot),128k(Environment),4M(Kernel),-(FreeNOR);NAND:32M(FS),-(FreeNAND)
...
> The problem is that once my system is running the MTD devices in /dev
> are not
hi ...
I am using p2020 processor. Accessed through mmc. But disk throughput is
very less. Its less than 1 MBps .. can some one suggest me how to improve
the disk throughput
regards
Souravs
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Slow-microsd-access-through-MMC-in-P2020-tp3
Hi ...
We want to access a SPI device throught the processor MPC8342. i had
configured the four lines connected to the device from the processor as SPI.
After that how to read the offset and data through the SPI IMMR registers?
regards
Souravs
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble
Le 10/02/2011 15:45, Alexandre Gambier a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I use U-Boot 1.3.1 with a NOR and a NAND Flash.
> I created the following partitions with U-Boot.
U-Boot 1.3.1 is rather old., BTW
> device nor0, # parts = 4
>#: namesizeoffset mask_flag
Hi,
On 02/10/2011 03:26 PM, Andy Pont wrote:
> Graeme wrote...
>
>>> Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
> did
>>> they never make it into the mainline code?
>>>
>>
>> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the
> one
>> with 'obnoxi
Hello,
I use U-Boot 1.3.1 with a NOR and a NAND Flash.
I created the following partitions with U-Boot.
device nor0 , # parts = 4
#: namesizeoffset mask_flags
0: U-Boot 0x0008 0x 0
1: Environment 0x000200
Graeme wrote...
> > Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
did
> > they never make it into the mainline code?
> >
>
> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the
one
> with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;)
If the
Le 10/02/2011 02:23, Aaron Williams a écrit :
> On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:08:12 pm Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> Le 08/02/2011 22:58, Aaron Williams a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to compile AHCI support but I'm running into a lot of
>>> problems. It looks like AHCI is based
I am not ready to submit a change as I have problems to boot my board on
the latest U-boot code.
I tested the change on a U-boot derived from July last year.
The tsec code is very similar to the latest code though.
Cheers,
Renaud.
On 09/02/11 22:01, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Renaud,
>
> On Wed, 2
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
---
This patch could also go through AT91/AVR32 rework branch. Currently no
in-tree board uses soft-i2c. But when using soft-i2c and including portmux.h in
board header imximage.o complains about double definition of sync() (once in
asm/io.h and once in system unist
Hello all
We are using OMAP 3530 board and SMSC9512 usb-ethernet adapter.
The main goal is to connect this adapter through USB OTG port and
initialize at u-boot. In order to do it, we are using your u-boot
patches for usb-ethernet SMSC95xx ( we patch your patch file to our
u-boot-re
On 10/02/11 21:13, Andy Pont wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting
> Windows CE image suggested here:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html
>
> Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
Hello!
Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting
Windows CE image suggested here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html
Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did
they never make it into the mainline code?
Than
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
> On Behalf Of Kumar Gala
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: Rick Ramstetter
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Thomas Taranowski
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Altering cpu/mpc85xx/start.S to
Ok.
Thank you very much.
On 02/10/2011 10:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Alexandre Gambier,
>
> In message<4d539e01.6070...@ftemaximal.fr> you wrote:
>>> waste of memory. You can see that the following sectors are unused
>>> from the 'E' (= empty) flag.
>> Even if the first 4 sectors are em
Dear Alexandre Gambier,
In message <4d539e01.6070...@ftemaximal.fr> you wrote:
>
> > waste of memory. You can see that the following sectors are unused
> > from the 'E' (= empty) flag.
> Even if the first 4 sectors are empty they are protected (see below). So
> the protected sectors are not sel
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Kumar Gala
wrote:
>
> > /* BEGIN MODIFICATIONS */
> > /* TURN ON THE LED */
> > s 9,0xff70
>
> is this a typo?
Yes. "s" --> "lis"
-Rick
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mai
On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Rick Ramstetter wrote:
> I am testing on an e500 core P2020 QorIQ (mpc85xx). As part of this testing,
> I would like to set a GPIO pin high (aka "turn on an led") during extremely
> early U-boot code.
>
> I have modified cpu/mpc85xx/start.S to (1) set GPIMR for one g
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks for this explanation.
Best regards
Alex
On 02/09/2011 07:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Alexandre Gambier,
>
> In message<4d52b843.5010...@ftemaximal.fr> you wrote:
>> I'm using u-boot to boot a Linux-based device.
>> I created some MTD partitions for my NOR and NAND f
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks for your reply and your help.
On 02/09/2011 07:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> The first sectors #0,1,2,3 are protected and sectors #8,9 (U-Boot
>> environment) are protected.
>> It should be sectors #0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and sectors #8,9.
> No, it should not. Only the sectors
Dear Marcel,
In message <201102100846.49072.korg...@home.nl> you wrote:
>
> I did create a new command "dfu" that activates the controller and DFU.
> I than used the GPBR register of the AT91 to make u-boot know that it has to
> activate DFU by script. Basically the value of the GPBR register ei
44 matches
Mail list logo