Hi,
Can u help on u-boot source code to find which board name is similar to NIC
card,irrespective of cpu and other hardware devices.Thank u.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Joe Hershberger,
In message you
wrote:
>
> > You might also go one step further and define variable types -
> > numeric, string, MAC addr, IP addr, ...
> >
> I'm guessing the reason for this being that the value can be validated on
> set instead of on use? I can see some interactive usabil
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> You might also go one step further and define variable types -
> numeric, string, MAC addr, IP addr, ...
>
I'm guessing the reason for this being that the value can be validated on
set instead of on use? I can see some interactive usabilit
.bss section should be zeroed out after relocat to ram.
Signed-off-by: Ender Dai
---
arch/arm/cpu/s3c44b0/start.S |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/s3c44b0/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/s3c44b0/start.S
index fe6b349..08722c1 100644
--- a/arch/
Machine types update pushed to arm/master.
Tom
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Commit 77c1458d caused the following compiler warnings:
fsl_esdhc.c: In function 'esdhc_pio_read_write':
fsl_esdhc.c:142: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
fsl_esdhc.c: In function 'esdhc_setup_data':
fsl_esdhc.c:169: warning: unused variable 'wml_value'
fsl_esdhc.c
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Gurumurthy G M
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Find attached disassembly file and register dump. let me know if you
> find any mistake or am missing something.
>
code looks pretty normal. Check that t9 (aka register 25) is set up
on entry to the function. I beli
Combine previously submitted POST cleanup patch series
into single patch. Fix plain POST support introduced recently
for mpc812x arch.
- Revives POST for blackfin arch;
- Removes redundant code:
arch/blackfin/lib/post.c
board/ssv/common/post.c
arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/commproc.c
Hello Tom,
Please consider this patch-set for mainline submission.
Please let me know if there are any changes to be made
in code or if the patches are good to go into mainline
Thanks & Regards
Vipin
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Vipin KUMAR wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> The following patch-set con
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> PDM360NG is a MPC5121E based board by ifm ecomatic gmbh.
>
[snip]
+#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ENDCONFIG_SYS_SRAM_SIZE
/* End of area */
+
+#define CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE 0x100 /* num bytes of initial data */
10 matches
Mail list logo