[U-Boot] [GIT PULL] please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

2010-05-07 Thread Kim Phillips
Wolfgang Denk, Please pull usb and UPMA support for the mvBLM7 and SIMPC8313, respectively: The following changes since commit 767fdc4af684770f5e97a6c5e19a8ac2616b8329: drivers/*/Makefile: fix conditional compile rule. (2010-05-06 00:41:08 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx/mvBLM7: add usb commands and cleanup.

2010-05-07 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:22:31 +0200 Andre Schwarz wrote: > Add USB commands. > Rename autoscript to bootscript. > Add automatic bootscript image generation to makefile. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Schwarz > --- applied. Thanks, Kim ___ U-Boot mailing li

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] mpc83xx: Add UPMA configuration to SIMPC8313

2010-05-07 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:04:43 -0700 Ron Madrid wrote: > Added UPM array table, upmconfig, and Local Bus configuration support for > SIMPC8313 > > Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid > --- applied. Thanks, Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Devkit8000: Fix compilation after changes in dm9000

2010-05-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 07 May 2010 12:58:34 Thomas Weber wrote: > In > dm9000.c is included and outb, etc. used > and in > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h +201 > I found #ifdef __io > but __io wasn't defined. > > I also think, that all arm-boards that uses the dm9000 will have this > problem at the moment. I tried

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Blackfin: nand: drain the write buffer before returning

2010-05-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
From: Andrew Caldwell The current Blackfin nand write function fills up the write buffer but returns before it has had a chance to drain. On faster systems, this isn't a problem as the operation finishes before the ECC registers are read, but on slower systems the ECC may be incomplete when the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Blackfin: nand: drain the write buffer before returning

2010-05-07 Thread Scott Wood
On 05/07/2010 01:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 07 May 2010 13:51:51 Scott Wood wrote: >> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:25:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> From: Andrew Caldwell >>> >>> The current Blackfin nand write function fills up the write buffer but >>> returns before it has had

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Blackfin: nand: drain the write buffer before returning

2010-05-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 07 May 2010 13:51:51 Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:25:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > From: Andrew Caldwell > > > > The current Blackfin nand write function fills up the write buffer but > > returns before it has had a chance to drain. On faster systems, this > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] logbuff: Change default console loglevel to 8

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Tyser
H Detlev, > > Previously, a default of 3 was assigned to the console loglevel while > > standard messages had a level of 4. This resulted in U-Boot's console > > disappearing if a user enabled CONFIG_LOGBUFFER but didn't manually set > > the 'loglevel' environment variable to a value greater than

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Blackfin: nand: drain the write buffer before returning

2010-05-07 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:25:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > From: Andrew Caldwell > > The current Blackfin nand write function fills up the write buffer but > returns before it has had a chance to drain. On faster systems, this > isn't a problem as the operation finishes before the ECC reg

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] logbuff: Prevent an infinite loop for console output

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Tyser
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 10:23 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > When using 'logbuff' as stdout and the console loglevel is greater > > than a message's loglevel it is supposed to be both logged, and printed > > to the console. The logbuff_printk() function is responsible for both > > lo

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove unused feature CONFIG_SERIAL_SOFTWARE_FIFO

2010-05-07 Thread Stefan Roese
This "feature" of a interrupt driven serial driver, is not enabled in any of the current configuration headers. It's only implemented in the PPC4xx UART driver. Since it's not used at all, this patch removes all references to it, resulting in a cleaner code. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese --- READM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Devkit8000: Fix compilation after changes in dm9000

2010-05-07 Thread Thomas Weber
On 07.05.2010 17:15, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Thomas Weber, In message <1273242366-6552-1-git-send-email-we...@corscience.de> <1273242366-6552-1-git-send-email-we...@corscience.de> you wrote: In commit a45dde2293c816138e53c26eca6fd0322583f9a6 the I/O accessor for the DM9000 is changed. The

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Timur Tabi
Scott McNutt wrote: > lib/libgeneric.a(display_options.o): In function `print_size': > /home/smcnutt/27xx/u-boot.git/lib/display_options.c:66: undefined > reference to `__udivdi3' > /home/smcnutt/27xx/u-boot.git/lib/display_options.c:69: undefined > reference to `__umoddi3' > /home/smcnutt/27xx/u

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Scott McNutt
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <4be42048.7000...@ge.com> you wrote: >> This did not happen when I last updated on March 22nd and >> I have not updated my tools at all. > > Then you are in an excellent position to run git bisect and find out > which exact commit is responsible for the changed be

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot hangs after detecting DDR3 RAM and Flash.

2010-05-07 Thread prakash bedge
Hi Stefan I checked the mcsr register and it shows 0x. while debugging the u-boot I observed that the u-boot hangs when it call getenv("loadaddr") function. if ((s = getenv ("loadaddr")) != NULL) { } Is it because of loadaddr parameter passed to getenv? Do I really need to check t

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot hangs after detecting DDR3 RAM and Flash.

2010-05-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear prakash bedge, In message you wrote: > > while debugging the u-boot I observed that the u-boot hangs when it call > getenv("loadaddr") function. > if ((s = getenv ("loadaddr")) != NULL) { } > > Is it because of loadaddr parameter passed to getenv? No. All this code is running on zil

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Enabled support for Rev 1.3 SPD for DDR2 DIMMs

2010-05-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 7, 2010, at 9:12 AM, York Sun wrote: > SPD has minor change from Rev 1.2 to 1.3. This patch enables Rev 1.3. > The difference has ben examined and the code is compatible. > Speed bins is not verified on hardware for CL7 at this moment. > > This patch also enables SPD Rev 1.x where x is up

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Devkit8000: Fix compilation after changes in dm9000

2010-05-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Thomas Weber, In message <1273242366-6552-1-git-send-email-we...@corscience.de> you wrote: > In commit a45dde2293c816138e53c26eca6fd0322583f9a6 the I/O accessor for > the DM9000 is changed. > > The definition of __io is required to use the standard I/O accessors from > asm/io.h. > > Signed-

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Timur Tabi
Nick Thompson wrote: > Is this the first use of long long on ARM...? include/asm-arm/types.h has this: #if defined(__GNUC__) __extension__ typedef __signed__ long long __s64; __extension__ typedef unsigned long long __u64; #endif So try replacing "unsigned long long" with "__u64" in print_size()

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: Remove CONFIG_SERIAL_SOFTWARE_FIFO

2010-05-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <201005071554.07984...@denx.de> you wrote: > > I just stumbled (again) upon the quite old define > "CONFIG_SERIAL_SOFTWARE_FIFO". I never used it, and always wondered if its > really useful. Checking the current config headers, no board sets this > define. > Only

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nick Thompson, In message <4be42048.7000...@ge.com> you wrote: > > This did not happen when I last updated on March 22nd and > I have not updated my tools at all. Then you are in an excellent position to run git bisect and find out which exact commit is responsible for the changed behaviour.

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Timur Tabi
Nick Thompson wrote: > Is this the first use of long long on ARM...? Ugh, I hope not. vsprintf.c uses ULL. It appears that the compiler itself supports ULL, but it's trying to link in support that your toolchain doesn't have. I don't know what __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0 is, but it doesn't look lik

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Nick Thompson
On 07/05/10 15:14, Nick Thompson wrote: > On 07/05/10 12:57, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am using U-Boot from http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=summary and trying >> to build for da830. But my build fails with following >> error: >> >> [...] >> /../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Devkit8000: Fix compilation after changes in dm9000

2010-05-07 Thread Thomas Weber
In commit a45dde2293c816138e53c26eca6fd0322583f9a6 the I/O accessor for the DM9000 is changed. The definition of __io is required to use the standard I/O accessors from asm/io.h. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weber --- include/configs/devkit8000.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletion

Re: [U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Nick Thompson
On 07/05/10 12:57, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > Hi, > > I am using U-Boot from http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=summary and trying > to build for da830. But my build fails with following > error: > > [...] > /../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.4.1 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot > ../lib/gc

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Enabled support for Rev 1.3 SPD for DDR2 DIMMs

2010-05-07 Thread York Sun
SPD has minor change from Rev 1.2 to 1.3. This patch enables Rev 1.3. The difference has ben examined and the code is compatible. Speed bins is not verified on hardware for CL7 at this moment. This patch also enables SPD Rev 1.x where x is up to "F". According to SPD spec, the lower nibble is opti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: dm9000x: use standard I/O accessors

2010-05-07 Thread Thomas Weber
On 07.05.2010 15:37, Thomas Weber wrote: > On 04/26/10 04:51, Ben Warren wrote: > >> Mike, >> >> ApplOn 4/14/2010 1:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >>> The current dm9000x driver accesses its memory mapped registers directly >>> instead of using the standard I/O accessors. This can cause p

[U-Boot] RFC: Remove CONFIG_SERIAL_SOFTWARE_FIFO

2010-05-07 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi, I just stumbled (again) upon the quite old define "CONFIG_SERIAL_SOFTWARE_FIFO". I never used it, and always wondered if its really useful. Checking the current config headers, no board sets this define. Only PPC4xx has it implemented. I'm suggesting to clean this up a bit, and remove this

[U-Boot] Oportunidad de negocios por expansión d e proyecto en Costa Rica

2010-05-07 Thread Carlos Alberto Bogantes Herrera
Un cordial saludo,mi nombre es Carlos Alberto Bogantes, soy ingeniero Forestal y vivo en Alajuela Me permito informarle que estamos iniciando operaciones de un negocio muy lucrativo aquí en Costa Rica, como en otros países de Centroámerica y Panamá Requerimos un socio residente en Costa Rica y en o

[U-Boot] Building for da830 fails

2010-05-07 Thread Sudhakar Rajashekhara
Hi, I am using U-Boot from http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=summary and trying to build for da830. But my build fails with following error: [...] /../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.4.1 -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot ../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.4.1/libgcc.a(bpabi.o):(.ARM.exidx+0x0):

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: dm9000x: use standard I/O accessors

2010-05-07 Thread Thomas Weber
On 04/26/10 04:51, Ben Warren wrote: > Mike, > > ApplOn 4/14/2010 1:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> The current dm9000x driver accesses its memory mapped registers directly >> instead of using the standard I/O accessors. This can cause problems on >> Blackfin systems as the accesses can get out o

[U-Boot] query about USB gadget framework

2010-05-07 Thread Dmitry Krivoschekov
Hi, I'm curious what are the current plans for merging the USB gadget framework [1] into mainline tree? Looks like there were attempts [2] to do so but I failed to figure out why it was not actually merged. Or was it dropped at some point later? Interesting why. Thanks, Dmitry [1] http://git

[U-Boot] u-boot ls cmd oops Unknown node type.

2010-05-07 Thread H. Johnny
Hi All, The ls command in u-boot can list contains of JFFS2 filesystem. It works fine after copy (cp.b $memaddr $noraddr) jffs2 image file to flash in u-boot. After boot to linux system and copy a file to JFFS2 filesystem and do sync, reboot then got following message in u-boot. The kernel I used

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] logbuff: Change default console loglevel to 8

2010-05-07 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Peter, > Previously, a default of 3 was assigned to the console loglevel while > standard messages had a level of 4. This resulted in U-Boot's console > disappearing if a user enabled CONFIG_LOGBUFFER but didn't manually set > the 'loglevel' environment variable to a value greater than 4. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] logbuff: Prevent an infinite loop for console output

2010-05-07 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Peter, > When using 'logbuff' as stdout and the console loglevel is greater > than a message's loglevel it is supposed to be both logged, and printed > to the console. The logbuff_printk() function is responsible for both > logging and displaying the message. However, logbuff_printk() > previ

Re: [U-Boot] Endless loop in cmd_log.c?

2010-05-07 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Peter, > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 12:22 -0700, Dennis Ruffer wrote: >> I am trying to implement CONFIG_LOGBUFFER and CONFIG_CMD_LOG on our ARM >> systems and I seem to have run into an endless loop. With loglevel=5 so we >> still see our console output, the printf at the end of logbuff_printk >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Fixup native builds on powerpc

2010-05-07 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Kumar, >> Kumar, could you please add proper In-reply-to:/References: headers >> to postings that obsolete earlier patches, so the new versions show >> up in the thread? Thanks. > > How do you do that with git send-email? If called without --compose git send-email will prompt for such a refere

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Fixup native builds on powerpc

2010-05-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > > Kumar, could you please add proper In-reply-to:/References: headers > > to postings that obsolete earlier patches, so the new versions show > > up in the thread? Thanks. > > How do you do that with git send-email? Enter the message ID of the message

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: modified calculated mmc-capacity & set mmc trans_speed

2010-05-07 Thread Andy Fleming
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Jae hoon Chung wrote: > Dear Andy > > Thanks for your comment.. > but i have some question... > > 2010/5/7 Andy Fleming : >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Jae hoon Chung wrote: >>> The patches do the following >>> 1. If mmc size is more than 2GB , we need to cal