Hi Alessandro,
El Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:01:34AM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> I'm sorry I can't test before wednesday as I'll be offline.
>
> I am doubtful, as usually precharge is done before setting mode, but
> your chips are clearly different from mine, I now expect that no
> sequence w
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:14:51PM -0800, Steven Zedeck wrote:
> Its in board/atmel/at91sam9rlek/nand.c
>
> It doesn't do much but set up the various GPIO connections. Here's the
> function:
>
> int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
> {
> nand->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
> #ifdef CFG_N
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160835h3f231337i67d073e646ffe...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I still do not understand why it can not be ctrlc() also.
> It can be scanned only once in the post_hotkeys_pressed() in the same
> manner any other mentioned by you above inp
Dear Wolfgang,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In order to relate on this indication we must be sure it is operating
>> correctly.
>> It could be done by observing diagnostics LEDs performing running "1" pattern
>> or any different algorithm which user is expected. Only
Dear Wolfgang,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>> > As mentioned before, the POST code is supposed to be NOT interactive.
>>
>> Then how we supposed to switch the POST_SLOWTEST mode?
>>
>> Is the proprietary HW button scanning implemented in post_hotkeys_pressed()
>> of s
Hi,
> I would not be surprised to see JFFS2 problems with most i.MX
> platforms. The nand ecc includes the spare area so you can not write
> a JFFS2 free marker to spare and then later write to the main area.
> There are patches for JFFS2 in the kernel for this. I don't know
> about u-boot.
Als
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160653w6efd755du2d4e8143be53e...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > As mentioned before, the POST code is supposed to be NOT interactive.
>
> Then how we supposed to switch the POST_SLOWTEST mode?
>
> Is the proprietary HW button scanning implemented
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Jens Scharsig wrote:
>> * updates the conditional main_clock calculation (if AT91_MAIN_CLOCK
>> defined) to c structure SoC access
>> * add need register flags
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
>> ---
>> cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c |7 ---
>> in
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160556o71b9814dl3bb35f26ff5ad...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > You may of course do that - it's your local code after all. But I tend
> > to believe that this does not make much sense. Interactive tests
> > should be run at a time when interaction
Dear Wolfgang,
> Please send plain text only.
Sorry for inconvenience but it is what I am actually trying to do from
within my
gmail. Very strange...
wrote:
>>
>> Working on the POST for mpc834x based board I encountered the following
>> problem:
>> The ctrlc() routine does not work when used f
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <660c0f821002160239w30d02211k66cd1df24c987...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> The test blinks the LEDs few times and performs running "1"
>> >> ilumination. Of course only visual control is possible
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160239w30d02211k66cd1df24c987...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> >> The test blinks the LEDs few times and performs running "1"
> >> ilumination. Of course only visual control is possible. The general
> >
> > This is not acceptable as a POST then. Only
Dear Michael Zaidman,
please STOP posting bease64 encoded stuff!
Please send plain text only.
In message <660c0f821002160043g73b85a1bn3b372c9f051a2...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Working on the POST for mpc834x based board I encountered  the following
> problem:
> The ctrlc() routine does
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <660c0f821002150322g34255468re9cf03d2ed493...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > Just out of interest, what exactly do you test there? Do you have
>> > any
>> > way of measuring if the LEDs work or no
CONFIG_MONITOR_IS_IN_RAM is broken for MCF532x (and all other
processors having RAM located above the FLASH area). This patch
fixes this by conditionally
- removing the vector table at the beginning of code (MCF532x)
- not overwriting the vector base register (MCF532x)
- removing the code to re-set
Hi,
2010/2/15 Krishna Pattabiraman :
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently developing a USB DFU feature for at91sam9263 board. I have to
> develop the driver for USB device port. I looked the uboot-usb git cdc
> branch it has a at91_udc.c driver it doesnt contain the udc_* api
> implementations. I found a
Hello,
Working on the POST for mpc834x based board I encountered the following
problem:
The ctrlc() routine does not work when used from post_hotkeys_pressed().
The value of ctrlc_disabled variable defined as static in the console.c
file is lost after code relocation.
By adding the ctrlc_disable
17 matches
Mail list logo