Re: [U-Boot] minor debug cleanups in ./net

On Thu 23 Jul 2009 02:27, Ben Warren pondered: > Robin, > > This won't apply: > > bwar...@bwarren-bldsrv:~/src/u-boot-net$ git am -s --whitespace=strip > ~/h_drive/patches/minor\ debug\ cleanups\ in\ ._net.eml > Applying minor debug cleanups in ./net > fatal: patch fragment without header at lin

Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:57 AM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Ben Warren; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request > > On Thursday 23 July 2009 08:16:47

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Add "chip_config" command for PPC4xx bootstrap configuration

This patch adds a generic command for programming I2C bootstrap eeproms on PPC4xx. An implementation for Canyonlands board is included. The command name is intentionally chosen not to be PPC4xx specific. This way other CPU's/SoC's can implement a similar command under the same name, perhaps with a

[U-Boot] Pull request - net

Wolfgang, The following changes since commit 189eec77795553157c087cd4695fb3ce2433: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net.git master Alessio Centazzo (1): ppc4xx: Fixe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fec_mxc: driver for FEC ethernet controller on i.MX27

Ilya Yanok wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok > --- > cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 10 + > drivers/net/Makefile |1 + > drivers/net/fec_mxc.c| 742 > ++ > drivers/net/fec_mxc.h| 304 + > include/netdev.h

Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

On Thursday 23 July 2009 08:16:47 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > I'm working on the repo right now and should have another > > pull request soon. The 'forced interface' patch is still > > contentious, so isn't included. > > Okay > With this for RD6281 Build will not fail, but network will be broken.

Re: [U-Boot] minor debug cleanups in ./net

Robin, This won't apply: bwar...@bwarren-bldsrv:~/src/u-boot-net$ git am -s --whitespace=strip ~/h_drive/patches/minor\ debug\ cleanups\ in\ ._net.eml Applying minor debug cleanups in ./net fatal: patch fragment without header at line 198: @@ -879,13 +856,13 @@ DhcpHandler(uchar * pkt, unsigned

Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ben Warren [mailto:biggerbadder...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:40 AM >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar >> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; U-Boot; Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; >> Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik >> Subj

Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Warren [mailto:biggerbadder...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:40 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: Wolfgang Denk; U-Boot; Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; > Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: FW: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request >

Re: [U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: Prafulla Wadaskar (3): Marvell Sheevaplug Board support Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support Marvell RD6281A Board support > Hi Ben, > I think Pull request net not yet applied. > This breaks build for RD6281A board. > > S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for Eukrea CPUAT91 SBC

Eric Bénard wrote: > Ben Warren wrote : >> This patch has many coding style violations that haven't been >> addressed, so it can't go in. I"m not a fan of the piece-meal PHY >> implementation > > coding style violations should be fixed in v3 / > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] - save the server's mac address...

Robin, Please keep in mind that the exact subject text becomes the changelog title: " - save the server's mac address..." looks pretty dumb. I took the liberty of cleaning it up. Robin Getz wrote: > On Tue 21 Jul 2009 02:37, Ben Warren pondered: > >> Can you please re-submit using git tools?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] usb: bugfix driver/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c function ehci_submit_root

> -Original Message- > From: l.ping...@gmail.com [mailto:l.ping...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Remy Bohmer > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:29 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] usb: bugfix > drive

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] uec: Fix compile warning

Kumar Gala wrote: > cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init': > cpu.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init' > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > include/netdev.h |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for Eukrea CPUAT91 SBC

Ben Warren wrote : > This patch has many coding style violations that haven't been addressed, > so it can't go in. I"m not a fan of the piece-meal PHY implementation coding style violations should be fixed in v3 / http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg18068.html Eric

[U-Boot] FW: ARM Pull Request

> > > Prafulla Wadaskar (3): > > > Marvell Sheevaplug Board support > > > Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support > > > Marvell RD6281A Board support Hi Ben, I think Pull request net not yet applied. This breaks build for RD6281A board. Some discussion was going for "net: Kirkwood_

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:35 AM > To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: U-Boot; Ben Warren > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request > > Dear Jean-Ch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for Eukrea CPUAT91 SBC

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >>> >>> -SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) >>> -OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS)) >>> +SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c) >>> +OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS) $(COBJS-y)) >>> >>> al

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm, i2c: added support for the TWSI I2C Interface

> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:17 AM > To: Heiko Schocher > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; U-Boot user list; Wolfgang Denk > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm, i2c: added support for the TWSI > I2C Interf

[U-Boot] gcc4.4 warning fix patches

Any comments (or acceptance of): http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/63614 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/63615 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/63616 - k ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] Rejected: PATCH Nios2 kernel bootstrap error due to missing processor data cache flush: fix

Wolfgang Wegner wrote: > Dear Scott, Wolfgang, > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Scott McNutt wrote: >> ... for a two line bug fix? >> >> This is hardly a valid reason to claim copyright on the module. >> >> This practice will only discourage the contribution of original work >> to the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] document network driver framework

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 19:00:40 Andy Fleming wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > + > > + CONFIG Options > > + > > + > > +The common config defines your device should respect (if applicable): > > + CONFIG_MII - configure in M

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

> Applied, thanks. > > Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we > release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now? > > Or do you have mnore stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for > pulling? Ilya Yanok patch which need ack from Scoot and Ben a at91rm9200 cleanup which

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <2009073039.gg19...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > this pull request need that ben send it's pull request for net first > as multiple patch depend on it > > Ben do you plan to send it soon? > > Please pull > The following c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fec_mxc: driver for FEC ethernet controller on i.MX27

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 19:32 Tue 21 Jul , Ilya Yanok wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok >> --- >> cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 10 + >> drivers/net/Makefile |1 + >> drivers/net/fec_mxc.c| 742 >> ++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] document network driver framework

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- > Ben: some things to note: >- i adopted Jean's proposed naming scheme in the CONFIG section >- i deprecated calling the driver-specific entry point > "xxx_initialization()" in f

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx (updated)

Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > (This has the updated versions of the 'bank' patches based on comments > from the list) > > - k > > The following changes since commit d4abc757c26c531293f5bbc4262ade44a317eec9: > Peter Tyser (1): > Move api_examples to examples/api > > are ava

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-i2c.git

Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4a65dae6.40...@denx.de> you wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > > The following changes since commit 1bc1538613d66cef3cbce680fc8d7c3561a0fbd0: > Peter Tyser (1): > Move examples/ to examples/standalone > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx

Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > The following changes since commit d4abc757c26c531293f5bbc4262ade44a317eec9: > Peter Tyser (1): > Move api_examples to examples/api > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master > > Kumar Gala (3

[U-Boot] minor debug cleanups in ./net

From: Robin Getz Minor ./net cleanups - no functional changes - change #ifdef DEBUG printf(); #endif to just debug() - changed __FUNCTION__ to __func__ - got rid of extra whitespace between function and opening brace - removed unnecessary braces on if statements gcc dead code elimination sho

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: factor out ROUND() macro

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <2009070950.gc26...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > On 23:35 Fri 17 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > A large number of boards (all AT91 based) duplicated the ROUND() > > macro in their board specific config files. Add the definition to > > in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91cap9adk: fix #ifdef/#endif pairing

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090722215459.gb26...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > On 20:47 Sat 18 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > The #ifdef/#endif pairing in this file was obviously messed up. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk > > --- > > include/configs/at91cap9a

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Wed 22 Jul 2009 18:00, Alessandro Rubini pondered: > > When I looked at the RFC data > > it appears that the overhead of IP fragmentation and reassembly (which > > does add overhead as the number of gateways increases) may be worth > > the time... > > Just tried it: U-Boot doesn't support reas

[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

Hi Wolfgang, this pull request need that ben send it's pull request for net first as multiple patch depend on it Ben do you plan to send it soon? Please pull The following changes since commit 462b1038738dd86f8dd70595f250ce792e90d244: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fec_mxc: driver for FEC ethernet controller on i.MX27

On 19:32 Tue 21 Jul , Ilya Yanok wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok > --- > cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 10 + > drivers/net/Makefile |1 + > drivers/net/fec_mxc.c| 742 > ++ > drivers/net/fec_mxc.h| 304 ++

Re: [U-Boot] arm, kirkwood: added kw_gpio_set_valid() in gpio.h

On 09:58 Thu 16 Jul , Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > This patch needs the patch from: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055854.html > first applied. > > include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/gpio.h |2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deleti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND IPL: Move u-boot-onenand linker script to common use

On 15:11 Mon 20 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jean-Christophe > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 17:10 Sat 11 Jul     , Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Use the common OneNAND linker script. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > >> --- > >> diff --git a/onena

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH1/2] Kirkwood: add Marvell Kirkwood gpio driver

> >From fcdea0c7bba3c25a1fb183bbcaf6d1a4ec32a157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dieter Kiermaier > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:22:13 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Kirkwood: add Marvell Kirkwood gpio driver > > > Signed-off-by: Dieter Kiermaier > --- > drivers/gpio/Makefile|1 + >

Re: [U-Boot] arm, kirkwood: added KW_TWSI_BASE in kirkwood.h

On 09:59 Thu 16 Jul , Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > include/asm-arm/arch-kirkwood/kirkwood.h |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > applied to u-boot-arm Best Regards, J. ___ U-Boot mailing l

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6][repost] Marvell RD6281A Board support

On 21:02 Thu 16 Jul , Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > This is Marvell's 88F6281_A0 based reference design board > > This patch is tested for- > 1. Boot from DRAM/NAND flash/NFS > 2. File transfer using tftp and loadb > 3. NAND flash read/write/erase > > Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar > --- > Ch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx27lite: add support for imx27lite board from LogicPD

Hi Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> +static int imx27lite_devices_init(void) >> +{ >> +struct gpio_regs *regs = (struct gpio_regs *)IMX_GPIO_BASE; >> +int i; >> +unsigned int mode[] = { >> +PD0_AIN_FEC_TXD0, >> +PD1_AIN_FEC_TXD1, >> +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] api: Fix broken build on ARM.

On 16:35 Fri 17 Jul , Piotr Ziecik wrote: > This patch fixes broken build introduced by commit > 84bf7ca522e94ec402a1264b01971b924b7e268f (api: remove un-needed > ifdef CONFIG_API already handle by the Makefile). > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik > --- > api/api_platform-arm.c |2 -- > 1 f

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: factor out ROUND() macro

On 23:35 Fri 17 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > A large number of boards (all AT91 based) duplicated the ROUND() > macro in their board specific config files. Add the definition to > include/common.h and clean up the board config files. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk build failled as we do not

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

> When I looked at the RFC data > it appears that the overhead of IP fragmentation and reassembly (which does > add overhead as the number of gateways increases) may be worth the time... Just tried it: U-Boot doesn't support reassembly, it seems. net.c confirms it: /* Can't deal

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91cap9adk: fix #ifdef/#endif pairing

On 20:47 Sat 18 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > The #ifdef/#endif pairing in this file was obviously messed up. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk > --- > include/configs/at91cap9adk.h |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) applied to u-boot-arm Best Regards, J. __

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix "ld: cannot find -lstubs" build error

Commit 1bc15386 moved the examples/ to examples/standalone but failed to adapt the Makefiles that need to link against libstubs.a Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- board/netstar/Makefile |2 +- board/trab/Makefile |2 +- board/voiceblue/Makefile |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for Eukrea CPUAT91 SBC

> > > > -SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) > > -OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS)) > > +SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c) > > +OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS) $(COBJS-y)) > > > > all: $(obj).depend $(LIB) > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND IPL: Move u-boot-onenand linker script to common use

On 09:08 Fri 17 Jul , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:48:30AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Basically I agree your opinion, however do see the other arch OneNAND > >> usage? I mean I can't see the other arch patches. > > > > There was nothing but

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm, i2c: added support for the TWSI I2C Interface

On 09:59 Mon 20 Jul , Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > - changes since v1: > added comments from Prafulla Wadaskar > - changes since v2 > added comments from Jean-Christophe > - added speed setting > > drivers/i2c/Makefile |1 + > drivers/i2c/kirk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] I2C Add initial support for TWL4030

On 11:12 Mon 20 Jul , Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Tom wrote: > > Omap2 is still pending. > > I was hoping to help Richard out with this last week but he was on travel. > > > > There is not much more I think I can do wrt omap2. > > All my targets are omap3. > > The nearest I can fin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM Cortex A8: Move OMAP3 specific reset handler

On 11:40 Mon 20 Jul , Minkyu Kang wrote: > Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc > > Cc: Dirk Behme > Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang > --- > cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/Makefile |1 + > cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/reset.S | 36 > cpu/a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx27lite: add support for imx27lite board from LogicPD

> + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; > + > +static int imx27lite_devices_init(void) > +{ > + struct gpio_regs *regs = (struct gpio_regs *)IMX_GPIO_BASE; > + int i; > + unsigned int mode[] = { > + PD0_AIN_FEC_TXD0, > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxc_nand: add nand driver for MX2/MX3

On 14:53 Fri 17 Jul , Ilya Yanok wrote: > Driver for NFC NAND controller found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3 > processors. Ported from Linux. Tested only with i.MX27 but should > works with other MX2 and MX3 processors too. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Wed 22 Jul 2009 16:53, Ben Warren pondered: > Robin Getz wrote: > > I see: > > > > #define TFTP_MTU_BLOCKSIZE 1468blksize > > static unsigned short TftpBlkSizeOption=TFTP_MTU_BLOCKSIZE; > > > > /* try for more effic. blk size */ > > pkt += sprintf((char *)pkt,"blk

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

Robin Getz wrote: > On Wed 22 Jul 2009 16:32, Ben Warren pondered:> Robin Getz wrote: > >>> On Wed 22 Jul 2009 10:04, jeffery palmer pondered: >>> >>> We are looking for an http client now as well. Our major issue revolves >>> around the download times for

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Wed 22 Jul 2009 16:32, Ben Warren pondered:> Robin Getz wrote: > > On Wed 22 Jul 2009 10:04, jeffery palmer pondered: > > > >> We are looking for an http client now as well. Our major issue revolves > >> > > around the download times for tftp. > > > >> > >> Can Volkmar Uhlig kindly

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

Robin Getz wrote: > On Wed 22 Jul 2009 10:04, jeffery palmer pondered: > >> We are looking for an http client now as well. Our major issue revolves >> > around the download times for tftp. > >> >> Can Volkmar Uhlig kindly provide the patches? >> >> Our units automically update thems

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Less verbose output when loading vxworks 6.x images

On Wed 22 Jul 2009 15:32, Niklaus Giger pondered: > Loading vxWorks 5.x images resulted just into 3 or 4 lines of output. > With vxWorks 6.x and the new GCC it emits about 30 lines, which is > far too noisy in my opinion. > > Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger > --- > common/cmd_elf.c |2 ++ > 1 f

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Wed 22 Jul 2009 10:04, jeffery palmer pondered: > We are looking for an http client now as well. Our major issue revolves around the download times for tftp. > > Can Volkmar Uhlig kindly provide the patches? > > Our units automically update themselves inside of uboot giving us the most > co

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Less verbose output when loading vxworks 6.x images

Loading vxWorks 5.x images resulted just into 3 or 4 lines of output. With vxWorks 6.x and the new GCC it emits about 30 lines, which is far too noisy in my opinion. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger --- common/cmd_elf.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:00 -0400, jeffery palmer wrote: > There are quite a few additions you can achieve with a TCP stack but of > course it needs to be very clean and well tested. > http://www.sics.se/~adam/uip/uip-1.0-refman/ I used it before on a small arm platform (small =16k ram) and us

[U-Boot] [RFC] arm/board.c: avoid ifdef using weak default functions

From: Alessandro Rubini While it's a matter of personal taste, I prefer to avoid ifdef when possible. For example, I don't like to add BOARD_LATE_INIT in the config file just to have my board_late_init() function called. This patch (not meant to be applied mainstram, jsut for discussion) tries

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Update the mtd driver name in bootargs for at91-based boards

The name of the atmel nand driver in the kernel changed from at91_nand to atmel_nand back in June 2008, but the at91-based boards config files still refer to at91_nand. This patch updates them with the new name Signed-off-by: Albin Tonnerre --- include/configs/at91cap9adk.h |4 ++-- inc

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx (updated)

(This has the updated versions of the 'bank' patches based on comments from the list) - k The following changes since commit d4abc757c26c531293f5bbc4262ade44a317eec9: Peter Tyser (1): Move api_examples to examples/api are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-

Re: [U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 18:04 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hi, > > Le Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:57:09 -0500, > Peter Tyser a écrit : > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Just a note, but its nice when you resend patches to include the > > string [PATCH vX] where X=2, 3, etc. That way whoever applies your > >

Re: [U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:57:09AM -0500, Peter Tyser wrote : > Hi Thomas, > > Just a note, but its nice when you resend patches to include the string > [PATCH vX] where X=2, 3, etc. That way whoever applies your patch can > tell which email contains the latest iteration of it. > > > This new ve

Re: [U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

Hi, Le Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:57:09 -0500, Peter Tyser a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Just a note, but its nice when you resend patches to include the > string [PATCH vX] where X=2, 3, etc. That way whoever applies your > patch can tell which email contains the latest iteration of it. Ok. > That's

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

The ACK delays are exactly what cause the extremely long download times. There are approx 16,000 ACK cycles for my 8MB image on a 512K blksize. I upped this to 1432 to stay under the MTU which cut the ACK cycles by three, but still, on a 180ms round trip time the math is simple. 8MB/1432bytes=5580

Re: [U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

Hi Thomas, Just a note, but its nice when you resend patches to include the string [PATCH vX] where X=2, 3, etc. That way whoever applies your patch can tell which email contains the latest iteration of it. > This new version includes the following changes : > > * Copyright header on config.mk

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Use do_div from div64.h for vsprintf

Use do_div from div64.h for vsprintf in case of 64bit division. For 32bit division, do_div from div64.h can't be used as it needs a 64bit parameter. Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme CC: Simon Kagstrom --- This patch replaces first version http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055599.html d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx: Fix mapping of 0xfffffxxx when CONFIG_MP

Hi Kumar, > > >> I understand what the patch does. It just removes the capability of > > >> soft-resetting a core back into the boot translation code. I > > >> understand your problem I'm just not keen on solving it by completely > > >> disabling boot translation. > > >> > > >> We had a similar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Replace 4xx lowercase SPR references

Dear Matthias Fuchs, In message <200907221727.56402.matthias.fu...@esd.eu> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs ... > board/esd/pmc440/pmc440.c |2 +- > board/mpl/mip405/mip405.c |2 +- > board/mpl/pip405/pip405.c |2 +- > board/netstal/hcu5/hcu5.c |8 +- > board/ne

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] xpedite5370: Enable NAND command support

On Jul 21, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Use the MPC8572's eLBC to access 1 GB (or greater) onboard NAND flash > via the 'nand' command. > > Previously, the XPedite5370's NAND chip selects were properly > configured, but NAND support was not enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] xes: Increase CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN to 16MB

On Jul 21, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Increasing CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN from 8 MB to 16 MB is necessary to > support uncompressing images larger than 8 MB when using the bootm > command. > > Note that recent Linux kernels for the 85xx and 86xx map greater than > 16MB of memory on bootup

Re: [U-Boot] Support for Calao USB A9263 board based on AT91SAM9263 CPU

The Calao USB A9263 board is a board manufactured and sold by Calao Systems . Its components are very similar to the AT91SAM9263EK board, so its configuration is based on the configuration of this board. There are however some differences: different clocks, no LCD, etc

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Replace 4xx lowercase SPR references

Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs --- This patch replaces my patch from yesterday titled [PATCH V2] ppc4xx: use SPRN_TCR macro instead of tcr board/esd/pmc440/pmc440.c |2 +- board/mpl/mip405/mip405.c |2 +- board/mpl/pip405/pip405.c |2 +- board/netstal/hcu5/hcu5.c |

Re: [U-Boot] include/asm-ppc/immap_86xx.h

On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:16 AM, David Updegraff wrote: > Hi. > > I think there is a small offset bug in here.. unless there is an > errata > that I have missed there should be no pad between srds1cr0,1. Anyone > know for sure? > > > --- a/include/asm-ppc/immap_86xx.h > +++ b/include/asm-ppc/imma

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

> Hm... but 20 minutes versus 30 seconds cannot be explained by TFTP > versus HTTP alone. There must be other effects impacting your network > traffic. Did you run any deeper analysis? I'm sure it depends on network delays. TCP has the sliding window mechanism, so several packets can be in flight

[U-Boot] include/asm-ppc/immap_86xx.h

Hi. I think there is a small offset bug in here.. unless there is an errata that I have missed there should be no pad between srds1cr0,1. Anyone know for sure? --- a/include/asm-ppc/immap_86xx.h +++ b/include/asm-ppc/immap_86xx.h @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ typedef struct ccsr_gur { uint

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

Dear "jeffery palmer", In message you wrote: > > We are looking for an http client now as well. Our major issue revolves > around the download times for tftp. HTTP will probably not be much faster. Did you try using NFS? > Our units automically update themselves inside of uboot giving us the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 85xx/86xx: Replace in8/out8 with in_8/out_8 on FSL boards

The pixis code used in8/out8 all over the place. Replace it with in_8/out_8 macros. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- board/freescale/common/pixis.c| 78 ++--- board/freescale/mpc8536ds/mpc8536ds.c | 22 +--- board/freescale/mpc8544ds/mpc8544ds.c

Re: [U-Boot] arm: pRAM support?

Dear Holger, In message <4a671863.9040...@keymile.com> you wrote: > > > Well, if you want to do it Right (TM) that means we would take this > > chance and fix the ARM memory map, which implies to implement > > relocation to a dynamicalle detemined relocation address. > > > can you explain this a

[U-Boot] [PATCH:v3] Support up to 7 banks for ids as specified in JEDEC JEP106Z

see http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep106Z.pdf Add some second source legacy flash chips 256x8. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 15 +- drivers/mtd/jedec_flash.c | 67 + include/flash.h | 10 +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx and 86xxFreescale processors.

On Jul 22, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote: >> >> ... >>> --- a/cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c >>> +++ b/cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c >> ... >>> +int probecpu (void) >>> +{ >>> + uint svr; >>> + uint ver; >>> + >>> + svr = get_svr(); >>> + ver = SVR_SOC_VER(svr); >>> + >>> + gd->cpu = identify_cp

[U-Boot] Ask: How speed up read nand flash on lpc3250

CPU:LPC3250. Nand:K9F2G8U0A 256M the u-boot boot time now about 8s. the step to read linux kernel less 2M cost more or less 4s!! I want to make it faster~,but don't know how to. I try to change the memcpy function.but it's works not very well. so i want to via the maillist to find some help. thank

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

Dear Robin Getz, In message <200907220826.58333.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org> you wrote: > > > Well, you are aware that such a thing would need a TCP/IP stack, which > > is far beyond what we currently have in U-Boot support? > > Yes - I'm aware. My thoughts were to do something like what IBM and o

Re: [U-Boot] Kernel RSA signature ?

Dear Cyrille Francois, In message <61acdef60907220506s6d203bbfvea7bfc0420003...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > Tivoize : no. > > My interest is the security part, I want a secure boot for remotely > upgrade my firmware. Verifying the SHA1 checksum of the loaded image should be sufficient, no? Be

Re: [U-Boot] Rejected: PATCH Nios2 kernel bootstrap error due to missing processor data cache flush: fix

Dear Wolfgang Wegner, In message <20090722103358.gw20...@leila.ping.de> you wrote: > > > Um... and instead of maintaining several private source trees you > > should consider poushing your code upstream, so that others do the > > maintenance for you. > > The intention is to do so with my next pr

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: Report which "bank" of NOR flash we are booting from on FSL boards

The p2020DS, MPC8536DS, MPC8572DS, MPC8544DS boards are capable of swizzling the upper address bits of the NOR flash we boot out of which creates the concept of "virtual" banks. This is useful in that we can flash a test of image of u-boot and reset to one of the virtual banks while still maintain

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

her suggestions were - use lwip. -Robin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot __ NOD32 4266 (20090722) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] 86xx: Report which "bank" of NOR flash we are booting from on MPC8641HPCN

The MPC8641HPCN board is capable of swizzling the upper address bit of the NOR flash we boot out of which creates the concept of "virtual" banks. This is useful in that we can flash a test of image of u-boot and reset to one of the virtual banks while still maintaining a working image in "bank 0".

Re: [U-Boot] arm: pRAM support?

Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Heiko Schocher, > > In message <4a66a86d.7070...@denx.de> you wrote: >> Andreas Huber wrote: >>> We are using the pRAM feature (CONFIG_PRAM) on the PPC architecture. As >>> we are switching to an ARM architecture (Kirkwood) I am wondering if >>> there is an equivalent U

Re: [U-Boot] http client?

On Tue 21 Jul 2009 17:09, Wolfgang Denk pondered: > Dear Robin Getz, > > In message <200907211400.21275.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org> you wrote: > > > > > I know there have been discussions about adding wget to U-Boot, > > > which I agree is not something that is worthwhile to do. > > I am not so

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH:v2] Support up to 7 banks for ids as specified in JEDEC JEP106Z

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 14:03:04 Niklaus Giger wrote: > see http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep106Z.pdf > Add some second source legacy flash chips 256x8. Please add an empty line here. > Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger And still some more white space cleanup comments below (sorry, I didn't

Re: [U-Boot] Kernel RSA signature ?

Tivoize : no. My interest is the security part, I want a secure boot for remotely upgrade my firmware. Thanks Cyrille ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH:v2] Support up to 7 banks for ids as specified in JEDEC JEP106Z

see http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep106Z.pdf Add some second source legacy flash chips 256x8. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c | 15 +- drivers/mtd/jedec_flash.c | 67 + include/flash.h | 10

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6] ppc4xx: Add 405EP based PMC405DE board

Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs --- patch v2: - coding style cleanup - added CONFIG_PHY1_ADDR patch v3: - refactor PLL reconfiguration code - beautify some one-line-functions patch v4: - remove 'sbe' command - add CONFIG_CMD_CHIP_CONFIG support

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] tools: mkimage: kwbimage list command support

> -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:11 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] tools: mkimage: kwbimage > list command support > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Support up to 7 banks for ids as specified in JEDEC JEP106Z. see http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep106Z.pdf Add some second source legacy flash chips 256x8.

Hi Niklaus, now you've got a very looong subject. Please split this into a shorter subject and put the rest in the commit text. Thanks. Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zund

Re: [U-Boot] Rejected: PATCH Nios2 kernel bootstrap error due to missing processor data cache flush: fix

Dear Wolfgang, On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: [...] > If you don't do that, then either somebody else will clean up your > patch and commit it and earn the credits for your work, or nobody will > care and the problem remains, which means your work was basicly > wast

  1   2   >