Re: [U-Boot] [patch] rm9200 ethernet driver: board-specific quirk (csb337)

On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote: > Applied to net repo. Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back. - Dave ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] Problem with memcpy on ppc8536

I believe the question should be sent to u-boot@lists.denx.de, not linuxppc-dev list. What is the TLB settings for NAND FCM buffer? Pay attention to set the TLB as cache inhibited and guarded attribute. If not set the guarded bit, it is possible to cause the speculate load from FCM buffer below t

Re: [U-Boot] "nand biterr" ... got an implementation?

This is still in my mailbox, don't know that I'll get around to it any time soon, but another requirement came to mind. On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:38:27PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > I was hoping that I could use that to test some NAND code, bu

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

Personally not interested. I don't want to license my code under GPLv3 g. On Jun 18, 2009 8:51 AM, "Wolfgang Denk" wrote: Hello, I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: --- Forwarded Message Date:Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:28 -0400 From:Richard Stallman To: Wolfgang De

Re: [U-Boot] Mac OS X Patches

HI Gary, Gary Carlson wrote: > Hello, > > I am hoping that someone might be able to answer a quick question. I > currently develop on Mac OS X. As many people know there are certain > problems related to building u-boot on this host platform because of header > files like byteswap.h and others.

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello, > > I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: > > --- Forwarded Message > > Date:Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:28 -0400 > From:Richard Stallman > To: Wolfgang Denk > Subject: U-book and GPLv3? > > I really enjoy the name U-boot. ^_^ s/U-boot/U-Bo

[U-Boot] Mac OS X Patches

Hello, I am hoping that someone might be able to answer a quick question. I currently develop on Mac OS X. As many people know there are certain problems related to building u-boot on this host platform because of header files like byteswap.h and others. I was going to work on patches to addres

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [PATCH v2] remove _IO_BASE and KSEG1ADDR from board configuration files

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:34:55 -0500 > Timur Tabi wrote: > > > The KSEG1ADDR macro used to be necessary for the RTL8139 Ethernet driver, > but > > the code that used that macro was removed over a year ago, so board > > configuration files

Re: [U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables inenv_init ?

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:42:54PM +0200, Manuel Sahm wrote: > >>> Guennadi Liakhovetski 18.06.2009 13:23 >>> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Manuel Sahm wrote: > > > Hello, > > Please, do not top-post. Also, please use quote markers and trim what you're not immediately replying to. > Hello, > all is i

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm nomadik: rename board and cleanup config

From: Alessandro Rubini This patch cleans up some glitches in the initial submission: - nobody calls it "nmdk8815": the board is "nhk8815", so rename - nand and onenand can coexist, so fix config file accordingly - configure the chip select for OneNand, so it works properly - removed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/6] MX31: NAND boot for PDK boards.

On 22:09 Thu 18 Jun , Magnus Lilja wrote: > Hi > > 2009/6/13 Magnus Lilja : > > Hi all, > > > > This is the latest set of patches that introduces NAND boot support > > for the i.MX31 CPU in general and the PDK board especially. > > Any chance this can be merged soon? It applies on u-boot mast

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] TWL4030 Add power reset button

The Zoom2 power reset button is on the top right side of the main board. Press and hold for about to 8 seconds to completely reset the board. Some of the beta boards have a hardware problem that prevents using this feature. If is difficult to further characterize the boards that fail. So disabl

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock.

This problem is seen on Zoom1 and Zoom2 in the startup and when i2c probe is used Before : In:serial Out: serial Err: serial timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_pin: I2C_STAT=1000 I2C

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] I2C Add initial support for TWL4030

The TWL4030 supplies many peripheral for OMAP3 boards. These include power management, usb and, keyboard. The product description is found here: http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tps65950.html Product reference document, tps65950.pdf, is found here: http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/tps65950

[U-Boot] V3 Zoom hw reset

The i2c patch is a cleaned up version of the one I RFC-ed to the list earlier. It addresses Nishanth's concerns by using the kernel's algorithm and by making the major parameters overridable by a board config. Jean's request for no weak function is addressed by this being done only with #defines

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/6] MX31: NAND boot for PDK boards.

Hi 2009/6/13 Magnus Lilja : > Hi all, > > This is the latest set of patches that introduces NAND boot support > for the i.MX31 CPU in general and the PDK board especially. Any chance this can be merged soon? It applies on u-boot master and runs fine. u-boot-arm/next is missing an apollon patch th

Re: [U-Boot] Merge Process

Dear Cem Eliguzel, In message <90679b950906180951r53175b65r7a9e26ae5993b...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > Our ultimate purpose is to have our architecture become one of the publicly > supported architectures by U-Boot. Then you should start (as soon as possible!) to following the commun

[U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM] Bug-fix in drivers mtd nand Makefile

The S3C2410 NAND driver source file is included in the makefile instead of the object file. Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt --- drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile index 71dd5b9..7

Re: [U-Boot] Merge Process

Dear Wolfgang, Our ultimate purpose is to have our architecture become one of the publicly supported architectures by U-Boot. What I really want to know is that should we always follow the master branch of original repo? I see several different branches as well. At the end, the patches we'll send t

[U-Boot] OMAP3 pending patches

As merge window is open now and to avoid confusion ;) I'd like that we update together our OMAP3 (ARM Cortex-A8 ?) pending patches list. Please help doing so. Below what I have in my list. I'm not sure that this is completely correct, I didn't miss anything, some of these are already applied s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] board support patch for phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: > Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from > Pengutronix.de. > Created CONFIG_SYS_ATA_CS_ON_TIMER01 define for when IDE CS is on Timer 0/1 > > Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl FWIW... Acked-by: Grant Likely g. > --- >  M

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:51 Thu 18 Jun     , Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: > I'm not for the GPLv3 I've the same opinion as Linus Torvald > > And as we share a lot's of code with Linux

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

On 16:51 Thu 18 Jun , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Hello, > > I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: I'm not for the GPLv3 I've the same opinion as Linus Torvald And as we share a lot's of code with Linux we should continue and not use the GPLv3 at all Please also note that we have code

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

On Thursday 18 June 2009 10:51:28 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > From:Richard Stallman >> Have you considered moving U-boot to "GPLv3-or-later"? > > I know that we have had similar discussions before (see for example > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/24029), but I > would like t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9263ek: active watchdog support via at91sam9263ek_wdt_config

I think that with this patch at91 watchdog is enough, it reduces code that is not yet used and I think it HAS NOT to be used(no wdt init). Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com diff -urpN b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c a/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c --- b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add WATCHDOG_RESET() on nand write and read

I think it's better to put Watchdog reset also inside read and write nand. What do you think? Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com diff -urpN b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c --- b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c 2009-06-14 21:30:39.0 +0200 +++ a/d

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add support for C5000 thermostimulator

Based on at91sam9263. It is a thermostimulator for hair styling. Subsection of Software is based on at91sam9263ek one. Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com diff -urpN b/board/micronova/c5000/c5000.c a/board/micronova/c5000/c5000.c --- b/board/micronova/c5000/c5000.c 1970-01-01 01:0

[U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

Hello, I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: --- Forwarded Message Date:Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:28 -0400 From:Richard Stallman To: Wolfgang Denk Subject: U-book and GPLv3? I really enjoy the name U-boot. What are the advantages of U-boot over PMON? Have you consider

Re: [U-Boot] Query on MAC address for OMAP3 boards

On Thursday 18 June 2009 06:29:28 Pillai, Manikandan wrote: > The MAC address for the SMC911x Ethernet chip is passed from u-boot to the > kernel using the SMC911x chip memory - "addrh" and "addrl" registers on the > SMC chip. read the faq: http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/EthernetDoesNotWorkInLi

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH add rgb555 for at91

Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Giulio, > >> Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com > > Can you please provide a somewhat more descriptive description? It may > be obvious for you what this does (or what new features can now be > used), but it isn't for me. > >> >> diff -urpN b/common/lcd.c

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH add rgb555 for at91

Hi Giulio, > Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com Can you please provide a somewhat more descriptive description? It may be obvious for you what this does (or what new features can now be used), but it isn't for me. > > diff -urpN b/common/lcd.c a/common/lcd.c > --- b/common/lcd.c

Re: [U-Boot] How to port uboot Marvell PXA320 Zylonite board

Hi Sada, > Please let me know anybody ported uboot on Marvell PXA320 Zylonite > board. Try make zylonite_config make ;) Cheers Detlev -- Q: Does that mean we also shouldn't be using IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM on interrupt [sources]? A: Yes. The flag needs to be taken out and shot.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Add CPU_TYPE_ENTRY support

Unify with 83xx and 85xx and use CPU_TYPE_ENTRY. We are going to use this to convey the # of cores and DDR width in the near future so its good to keep in sync. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c | 33 + include/asm-ppc/processor.h |2

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 8xxx: Fix PCI bus address setup for 36-bit configs

We want the outbound PCI memory map to end at the 4G boundary so we can maximize the amount of space available for inbound mappings if we have large amounts of memory. This matches the device tree setup in the kernel for the 36-bit physical configs for the platforms that have one (MPC8641 HPCN & M

Re: [U-Boot] Merge Process

Dear Cem, in message <90679b950906180633pf351261u7e581fc723806...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > We have, here at Ubicom , an ongoing process to port > u-boot to our architecture. Last week we decided to merge the upstream > u-boot codes to our local branch on which had for

Re: [U-Boot] mcf5445x watchdog support in U-Boot

Hi TsiChung, I can supply you my patch for a watchdog driver implementation for 5445x to test with if you like? I've not fed it back to Freescale yet. Will do though. It's based on 2.6.29. Is there a mechanism to allow U-Boot to indicate to Linux that it has enabled the watchdog (eg as part of th

[U-Boot] Merge Process

Hi all, We have, here at Ubicom , an ongoing process to port u-boot to our architecture. Last week we decided to merge the upstream u-boot codes to our local branch on which had forked from the upstream branch about 8 months ago.We successfully managed to merge remote master

Re: [U-Boot] Query on MAC address for OMAP3 boards

Dear Mani, In message <19f8576c6e063c45be387c64729e739404327a0...@dbde02.ent.ti.com> you wrote: > > I am seeing an issue with the OMAP3 EVM boards. > > The MAC address for the SMC911x Ethernet chip is passed from u-boot to the = > kernel using the > SMC911x chip memory - "addrh" and "addrl" reg

Re: [U-Boot] mcf5445x watchdog support in U-Boot

Matt, Yes. I am planning to enable watchdog in mcf5445x in u-boot. Need to investigate more in booting linux and the transition to starting the linux kernel of watchdog behavior to make sure it is not causing problem to the linux kernel. Best Regards, TsiChung -Original Message- From: M

Re: [U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables inenv_init ?

>>> Guennadi Liakhovetski 18.06.2009 13:23 >>> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Manuel Sahm wrote: > Hello, Please, do not top-post. > thanks for reply, > > this patch is very good in general, but the problem is that the > function nand_boot() is never called in my architecture. > I use a AT91SAM9G20 from

Re: [U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables inenv_init ?

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Manuel Sahm wrote: > Hello, Please, do not top-post. > thanks for reply, > > this patch is very good in general, but the problem is that the > function nand_boot() is never called in my architecture. > I use a AT91SAM9G20 from Atmel [ARM9]. > > Do oyu have another idea ?

[U-Boot] mcf54455 evb ethernet tx timeouts

Hi TsiChung, I pulled U-Boot from git (2009.06-00185-g57fe301), configured it for the Freescale mcf54455 EVB with Intel flash (M54455EVB_intel_config) and programmed it into the Intel flash device. It boots fine but when it attempts any ethernet communication whatsoever there are tx timeouts from

[U-Boot] PATCH add rgb555 for at91

Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com diff -urpN b/common/lcd.c a/common/lcd.c --- b/common/lcd.c 2009-06-14 21:30:39.0 +0200 +++ a/common/lcd.c 2009-06-18 12:45:15.0 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* +/*OC * Common LCD routines for supported CPUs * * (C) Copyright

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: redirect the pointer of bbt pattern to RAM

The bbt descriptors contains the pointer to the bbt pattern which are statically initialized memory struct. When relocated to RAM, these pointers will continue point to NOR flash(or L2 SRAM, or other boot device). If the contents of NOR flash changed or L2 SRAM disabled, it'll hang the system. Sig

[U-Boot] Query on MAC address for OMAP3 boards

Hi, I am seeing an issue with the OMAP3 EVM boards. The MAC address for the SMC911x Ethernet chip is passed from u-boot to the kernel using the SMC911x chip memory - "addrh" and "addrl" registers on the SMC chip. Scenario 1: The ipaddr, serverip and ethaddr environment variables are correct. Bo

Re: [U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables inenv_init ?

Hello, thanks for reply, this patch is very good in general, but the problem is that the function nand_boot() is never called in my architecture. I use a AT91SAM9G20 from Atmel [ARM9]. Do oyu have another idea ? Thanks a lot Manuel >>> Guennadi Liakhovetski 18.06.2009 11:39 >>> On Thu, 18 Jun

Re: [U-Boot] MX31 NAND Boot Patch - u-boot/next branch

Hello, I applied the patch series v4. That worked nicely. But know I'm not sure if I have to apply the patches from previous versions too? My main concern is the file "mx31_nand.c" in drivers/mtd/nand/. In previous versions of the patch you always worked with this file to add the NAND Flash Con

[U-Boot] PATCH: Fix examples for OMAP3 boards...

Description: The attached patch corrects an error in the examples/Makefile which causes the applications in the examples directory to hang on OMAP3 based boards. The current Makefile sets -Ttext during linking to 0x0c10 which is outside of addressable SDRAM memory. The script corrects the

Re: [U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables in env_init ?

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Manuel Sahm wrote: > Hello, > > I want to use the "silent" paramter of ubbot in a dynamically way. > The problem is that I use a Nand Flash to store my uboot paramters. > > When the function env_init is called only the default enviroment is > linked as the actual enviroment.

[U-Boot] howto get the nand flash enviroment variables in env_init ?

Hello, I want to use the "silent" paramter of ubbot in a dynamically way. The problem is that I use a Nand Flash to store my uboot paramters. When the function env_init is called only the default enviroment is linked as the actual enviroment. After env_init the serial console is initialized and t

[U-Boot] How to port uboot Marvell PXA320 Zylonite board

Hi Please let me know anybody ported uboot on Marvell PXA320 Zylonite board. Thanks Sada Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the address

[U-Boot] Marvell Kirkwood newbie question GPIO functions

Hello everybody out there, first off all - thanks to everyone from the u-boot community for this helpful piece of code :) Could somebody give me a short overview of the plans regarding the u-boot port of the Kirkwood arch (e.g. Sheevaplug board)? Currently I'm using the u-boot from git.marvell