Hi All,
I would like to use miiphy_read and miiphy_write functions provided by
u-boot in the linux kernel driver.
This is required for reading the link status of each of the phys
associated with a switch.
I added miiphy_read and miiphy_write to the exports.h and tried to use
it in t
Hi. dear all
my u-boot-2008.03 use tftp download my kernel ,
but my u-boot was frezzing at Uncompressing Linux ...
and show nothing anymore in my console
i try another way to start my kernel : nfs , but there is the same issue in
my u-boot .
//here are is u-boot information in my console
Permit the use of a + prefix to sizes in nand commands to extend operations
to multiples of the appropriate page or erase block size.
Signed-off-by: Josh Karabin
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 122 +++--
1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
On Sat, 16 May 2009 10:47:41 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> We rename the board so we use a consistent name in U-Boot and in
> Linux. Also, we use this opportunity to move the board into the
> Freecale vendor directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: John Rigby
> ---
> MAKEALL
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
> +unsigned char get_random_hex(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u32 inbuf[16];
> + u8 outbuf[16];
> +
> + /*
> + * in case of 88F6281/88F6192 A0,
> + * Bit7 need to reset to generate random values in KW_REG_UNDOC_0x1470
> + * Soc reg offsets KW_REG
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [plagn...@jcrosoft.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:25 PM
To: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM DaVinci Leopard Board Support
On 22:47 Mon 18 May , Wolfgan
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <20090518212049.gj17...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> I've to write an application that need to use the mmc and net but can not
> be under GPL
MMC is not exported to API, is it?
And why cannot your application be under GPL?
Best regards,
Wo
On Monday 18 May 2009 17:20:49 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:16 Mon 18 May , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 18 May 2009 16:31:39 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > I'd like to known if it's possible to update the COPYING
> > >
> > > NOTE! This copyright d
On 09:25 Fri 15 May , Matthias Ludwig wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe
>
> > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > > +struct gpmc_cs {
> > > + unsigned int config1; /* 0x00 */
> > > + unsigned int config2; /* 0x04 */
> > > + unsigned int config3; /* 0x08 */
> > > + unsigned in
On 07:56 Sat 16 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
> Some OMAP3 boards need control for external power companion
> chips. Introduce a CONFIG option for this, to avoid Makefile
> changes for each board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme
> ---
IIRC the Revc Change it's companion chip is this code still compat
On 08:39 Sat 16 May , Dirk Behme wrote:
> The Beagle rev Cx and Overo boards are using both SDRC CSes. The MUX
> setting is needed for the second CS clock signal to allow the 2 RAM
> parts to be put in self-refresh correctly. This also works on rev B
> Beagle boards with 128M of RAM.
>
> From:
> + * Each MPP functionality can be configuration by a 4bit value
> + * of MPP control reg, the value and associated functionality is SoC
> + * varient dependent
> + */
> +#define MV88F6281GTW_GE_MPP0_7 0x0111
> +#define MV88F6281GTW_GE_MPP8_15 0x11103311
> +#define M
>
> v7.1: u-boot.lds moved from board specific to kirkwood
>
you can remove the u-boot.lds
and it's reference in cpu/arm926ejs/config.mk as you use the same as the
cpu/arm926ejs/u-boot.lds
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
h
> +
> + icache_enable();
> + /* Change reset vector to address 0x0 */
> + temp = get_cr();
> + set_cr(temp & ~CR_V);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT */
> diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.h b/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.h
please move to include/asm
On 22:47 Mon 18 May , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>
> In message <20090518202149.gg17...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > +#ifndef __CONFIG_H
> > > +#define __CONFIG_H
> > > +#include
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +#define DAVINCI_LEOPARD
> > please CONFIG_
>
On 17:16 Mon 18 May , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 18 May 2009 16:31:39 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > I'd like to known if it's possible to update the COPYING
> >
> > NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover the so-called "standalone"
> > applications that use U-
On Monday 18 May 2009 16:31:39 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> I'd like to known if it's possible to update the COPYING
>
> NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover the so-called "standalone"
> applications that use U-Boot services by means of the jump table
> p
Hi All,
I am trying to clone the configuration of a board already exiting in
U-boot in an effort to port u-boot to this board.
I changed the following files
Makefile - To copy the config rule for the corresponding board.
created a directory for the new board in the "board" directory and
copied
Wolfgang,
I think what JC means is to use something like
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIST { DAVINCI_NAND_BASE, }
Now this info is available in the hardware.h file for DaVinci but it
requires a little tweak. I just sent another patch to address that
[PATCH] ARM DaVinci Minor Change to header f
WE want to use MACROS in the config files for various DaVinci boards.
At the moment this is not possible because we get compilation error
when we include the hardware.h header file in the config file
for various SOC's and then try to compile.
This patch addresses comments received while submitting
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <20090518202149.gg17...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > +#ifndef __CONFIG_H
> > +#define __CONFIG_H
> > +#include
> > +
> > +
> > +#define DAVINCI_LEOPARD
> please CONFIG_
Or rather CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_LEOPARD
This is not a user-0selectable p
Hi,
I'd like to known if it's possible to update the COPYING
NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover the so-called "standalone"
applications that use U-Boot services by means of the jump table
provided by U-Boot exactly for this purpose - this is merely
On 22:06 Sat 02 May , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> This patch adds support for displaying CPU type information
> about Atmel AT91 cores during boot. It currently only configures it for the
> at91sam9261ek board, but it can easily be configured for all at91 based cores.
please do this in two seperate pa
On 10:32 Wed 13 May , s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
> The patch applies to arm/next. It was tested on a leopard board.
> After testing had to change the MACH TYPE as this board is not present
> in the list of mach types at the moment. So the patch itself is going
> to give a compilation failure.
whic
On 2009-05-15, at 23:19, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <0ad43a8e-402b-41f0-bab1-e6d7f7537...@semihalf.com> you
> wrote:
>> Dear Wolfgang,
>>
>> On 2009-03-29, at 00:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Rafal,
>>>
>>> it seems the api_examples/ code fails when building out of tree:
>>
>> ...
Dear Magnus,
In message <59b21cf20905180959p4e736d52g566b0e826e17c...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> After having browsed some powerpc code I can find two different ways
> the struct-thing is used:
> Variant A, all members declared volatile:
> struct controller_reg {
> volatile uint32_t reg1;
Dear vishalD,
In message <23596126.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote:
>
>
> I am using the sbc2410x board. I successfully compiled the uboot-1.1.6 for
> this board. But after downloading the uboot.bin to the flash, i am not
> getting the uboot prompt on serial terminal.
U-Boot 1.1.6 is obsolete.
Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KB9202B_ATL
>>> +#define CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS0
>>> +#else
>> Is this really the recommended way of turning off flash support?
>
> thanks for your review and your comments.
>
> i'm new to u-boot development, could you point me to the correct way
> of
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> After having browsed some powerpc code I can find two different ways
> the struct-thing is used:
> Variant A, all members declared volatile:
> struct controller_reg {
> volatile uint32_t reg1;
> volatile uint32_t reg2;
> }
>
> str
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Matthias Ludwig,
>
> In message <20090518081724.ga19...@ultratronik.de> you wrote:
>
>> Dear Mani,
>>
>>
>>> I was testing the latest tip of u-boot and v2009.06-rc1,
>>> I find that the Ethernet is not working.
>>>
>> i assume you are using a board with SM
Dear Wolfgang,
2009/5/14 Wolfgang Denk :
>> I see. PowerPC in Linux uses C structs too. But there are still a lot of
>> code that uses registers offsets in Linux, so my arguments are the same:
>> requirement to convert offsets to C struct brings additional
>> difficulties to porting (and maintaini
From: prafulla_wadaskar
This is Marvell's 88F6281_A0 based custom board developed
for wireless access point product
This patch is tested for-
1. Boot from DRAM/SPI flash/NFS
2. File transfer using tftp and loadb
3. SPI flash read/write/erase
4. Booting Linux kernel and RFS from SPI flash
Review
Kirkwood family controllers are highly integrated SOCs
based on Feroceon-88FR131/Sheeva-88SV131 cpu core.
SOC versions supported:-
1) 88F6281-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6281_A0
2) 88F6192-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6192_A0
Other supported features:-
1) get_random_hex() fucntion
2) SPI port cont
Kirkwood family controllers are highly integrated SOCs
based on Feroceon-88FR131/Sheeva-88SV131 cpu core.
SOC versions supported:-
1) 88F6281-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6281_A0
2) 88F6192-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6192_A0
Other supported features:-
1) get_random_hex() fucntion
2) SPI port cont
Chips supported:-
1. 88E6161 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6165 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6132 3 port gbe swtich with 2 integrated PHYs
Platform specific configuration supported for:-
default or router port vlan configuration
led_init configuration
mdip/n polar
Hi All,
I am new to uBoot.
I am using the sbc2410x board. I successfully compiled the uboot-1.1.6 for
this board. But after downloading the uboot.bin to the flash, i am not
getting the uboot prompt on serial terminal.
I am using the NAND flash. Do i have to make the changes for NAND flash and
re
Hi All,
I am new to uBoot.
I am using the sbc2410x board. I successfully compiled the uboot-1.1.6 for
this board. But after downloading the uboot.bin to the flash, i am not
getting the uboot prompt on serial terminal.
I am using the NAND flash. Do i have to make the changes for NAND flash and
r
This patch adds support for new TI DaVinci SOC DM365. Further details
and user guides can be found at
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tms320dm365.html
The DM365 EVM is from Spectrum Digital and details are at
http://support.spectrumdigital.com/boards/evmdm365/revc/
This patch does NO
Currently, when booting from NAND using nand_spl, in the beginning the default
environment is used until later in boot process the dynamic environment is read
out. This way environment variables that must be interpreted early, like the
baudrate or "silent", cannot be modified dynamically and remain
Remove an unused "total" variable in multiple functions.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
common/env_nand.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c
index 76569da..21bce25 100644
--- a/common/env_nand.c
+++ b
Hi Detlev,
Seems there was an issue with my kernel code that you correctly
pointed out in previous mail.
Now I could pass bootarg board='myboard'. For myboard, I have done
relevent changes in kernel code, so kernel does init for my hardware.
Earlier while choosing mips machine, it was choosing g
Dear Deepak Gopalakrishnan,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> this time i want to know is there anywat i can get a application in linux
> to fetch the bootstrap and u-boot version and display it
> i have no idea how this can be done
> could someone give a start.im using AT91Bootstrap and
Hi all
this time i want to know is there anywat i can get a application in linux
to fetch the bootstrap and u-boot version and display it
i have no idea how this can be done
could someone give a start.im using AT91Bootstrap and
u-boot-1.1.5_atmel_1.2
thanks alot
note:sorry if i h
Ben,
Any comments on this patch?
Thanks,
Sandeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulraj, Sandeep
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:46 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep
> Subject: [PATCH] DaVinci Network Driver Updates
>
> Different flavours of DaVinci SOC's have di
This patch fixes the accidental erase of OneNand whole chip when issuing
command "onenand erase".
Signed-off-by: Geiger Ho
--- u-boot-2009.03/common/cmd_onenand.c 2009-03-22 05:04:41.0 +0800
+++ u-boot-2009.03-dev/common/cmd_onenand.c 2009-05-18
17:57:27.0 +0800
@@ -367,6
While hard_i2c support is not available
(see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049751.html),
this patch enables soft_i2c on AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dr
This patch is a rebase against branch arm/next and adds support for
MEESC board of esd gmbh.
The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile |3 +
board/esd
>
> The SYS_CLK_IN of MPC8569MDS is 66.66MHz,
> The DDR_CLK_IN is same with SYS_CLK_IN in 8569 processor.
> so, change the SYS_CLK_IN from 66MHz to 66.66MHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Liu
> ---
> include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -
The SYS_CLK_IN of MPC8569MDS is 66.66MHz,
The DDR_CLK_IN is same with SYS_CLK_IN in 8569 processor.
so, change the SYS_CLK_IN from 66MHz to 66.66MHz.
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu
---
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/confi
Ok, so when I say "don't work", it mean that it don't change anything.
This option should quiet messages on the console, but all messages are
still printed.
2009/5/18 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear simon polette,
>
> In message <72795ccb0905180218w1a23321fi1c93c84345a16...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb:
>> My value was at 100. Switching back to 1000 didn't solve my problem,
>> but instead causes erase and write operations on nand flash to timeout
>> as well. My u-boot was built on commit
>> 03bab0091948196b9558248684c04f60943ca4b5 of the at-91 tr
Dear simon polette,
In message <72795ccb0905180218w1a23321fi1c93c84345a16...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get U-Boot run silently by #defining
> CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE and CONFIG_SYS_DEVICE_NULLDEV in the config
> file, and setting "silent" in the environment, but it still don't
>
Yes, I misunderstand the problem. Use CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to
enable/disable for autoboot.
2009/5/18 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear "H. Johnny",
>
> In message <50a974c70905180032t18a559ffxd2772d36ef23c...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Set bootargs in u-boot command if you just want to autoboot. For exa
Hi,
I'm trying to get U-Boot run silently by #defining
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE and CONFIG_SYS_DEVICE_NULLDEV in the config
file, and setting "silent" in the environment, but it still don't
work.
Do I forget anything?
My device is a at91sam9261ek board (arm).
Best regards,
Simon Polette
Adeneo - Ad
On Monday 18 May 2009 04:37:54 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > The kernel stores address<->symbol names in it so things can be decoded
> > at runtime. Do it in U-Boot, and we get nice symbol decoding when
> > crashing.
>
> I like the idea as a pretty useful debug help.
Dear "H. Johnny",
In message <50a974c70905180032t18a559ffxd2772d36ef23c...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Set bootargs in u-boot command if you just want to autoboot. For example,
This is nonsense. The "bootargs" variable is completely unrelated to
autoboot.
> You also can modify the CONFIG_EXT
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1242627582-25398-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The kernel stores address<->symbol names in it so things can be decoded at
> runtime. Do it in U-Boot, and we get nice symbol decoding when crashing.
I like the idea as a pretty useful debug help.
Dear Matthias Ludwig,
In message <20090518081724.ga19...@ultratronik.de> you wrote:
> Dear Mani,
>
> > I was testing the latest tip of u-boot and v2009.06-rc1,
> > I find that the Ethernet is not working.
>
> i assume you are using a board with SMSC911x ethernet chip? If so, this
> discussion ma
Dear "Zvi Vered",
In message <509266184e1640ce8b4b0a06f1adf...@userd662364e58> you wrote:
>
> Is it possible to boot an X86 machine (with ATOM or Core2Duo) using
> uboot ?
U-Boot has not been ported to Atom ore Core2Duo yet.
> If yes, how uboot is loaded to the master boot record of the disk fr
Dear Mani,
> I was testing the latest tip of u-boot and v2009.06-rc1,
> I find that the Ethernet is not working.
i assume you are using a board with SMSC911x ethernet chip? If so, this
discussion may help you:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050687.html
SMSC911x (and oth
2009/5/18 Vijay Nikam :
> Hello All,
>
> I have bsp from freescale for mpc8313erdb evalutaion board. the board
> is up and running no issues with it as of now.
> But in u-boot the autoboot option is not enabled and I would like to
> have enabled. I believe that I need to do some changes in the u-bo
> I have bsp from freescale for mpc8313erdb evalutaion board. the board
> is up and running no issues with it as of now.
> But in u-boot the autoboot option is not enabled and I would like to
> have enabled. I believe that I need to do some changes in the u-boot
> source code.
> Could anyone please
Hello All,
I have bsp from freescale for mpc8313erdb evalutaion board. the board
is up and running no issues with it as of now.
But in u-boot the autoboot option is not enabled and I would like to
have enabled. I believe that I need to do some changes in the u-boot
source code.
Could anyone please
With our Blackfin boards, we like to build the compression routines with
-O2 as our tests show a pretty good size/speed tradeoff. For the rest of
U-Boot though, we want to stick with the default -Os as that is mostly
control code. So in our case, we would add a line like so to the board
specific
64 matches
Mail list logo
