Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Timur, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher >> --- > > Could you add a description that says what I2C mux support is? That > would make it easier to review this patch. Ok, do this with the next version of this patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Kim, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:09 +0100 > Heiko Schocher wrote: [...] >> unsigned int i2c_get_bus_num(void) >> { >> +#if defined(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) >> +return i2c_bus_num_mux; >> +#else >> return i2c_bus_num; >> +#endif >> } > > I don't get this mux variant -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: Add support sh_eth to cpu of sh4

2009-02-23 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 24 February 2009 02:20:40 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu >> --- >> cpu/sh4/cpu.c |1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/cpu/sh4/cpu.c b/cpu/sh4/cpu.c >> index 52b6cfd..be410ab 100644 >> ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: Add support sh_eth to cpu of sh4

2009-02-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 02:20:40 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > --- > cpu/sh4/cpu.c |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpu/sh4/cpu.c b/cpu/sh4/cpu.c > index 52b6cfd..be410ab 100644 > --- a/cpu/sh4/cpu.c > +++ b/cpu/sh4/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: Add support sh_eth to cpu of sh4

2009-02-23 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- cpu/sh4/cpu.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/sh4/cpu.c b/cpu/sh4/cpu.c index 52b6cfd..be410ab 100644 --- a/cpu/sh4/cpu.c +++ b/cpu/sh4/cpu.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91RM9200 BGA port D defines

2009-02-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
Hello, we are still working on a new U-Boot port for our customer and an own board. I think the release is in the second of 2009. Best Regards, Jens Scharsig Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb: > On 08:17 Mon 23 Feb , Jens Scharsig wrote: >> This patch add's the defines for port d I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Kim, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:09 +0100 > Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> @@ -369,6 +370,23 @@ i2c_probe(uchar chip) >> >> int i2c_set_bus_num(unsigned int bus) >> { >> +#if defined(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) >> +if (bus < CONFIG_SYS_MAX_I2C_BUS) { >> +i2c_bus_num =

Re: [U-Boot] Some question about uboot

2009-02-23 Thread Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of loody > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:19 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: [U-Boot] Some question about uboot > > Dear all: > While porting uboot, I find there ar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9 v3] 83xx, kmeter1: add I2C, dtt, eeprom support

2009-02-23 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Kim, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:05 +0100 > Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> This patch adds I2C support for the Keymile kmeter1 board. >> It uses the First I2C Controller from the CPU, for >> accessing 4 temperature sensors, an eeprom with IVM data >> and the booteeprom over

[U-Boot] Some question about uboot

2009-02-23 Thread loody
Dear all: While porting uboot, I find there are too many things I don't need at all, like net, i2c etc. How could I remove them from my uboot binary to minimize the size of uboot, my flash limitation is 6k? I try to edit Makefile to remove them by marking some library setting, but it compile error

Re: [U-Boot] (no subject)

2009-02-23 Thread md ks
Hi, Thanks for your Reply. I am using u-boot-1.3.3 and linux kernel 2.6.29-rc2. we are able to display customised logo in U-boot level , kenel level and file system level. But while switching from u-boot to Kernel , Screen(Display) is showing Blank screen (4 to 5 seconds). Is i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91RM9200 BGA port D defines

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:17 Mon 23 Feb , Jens Scharsig wrote: > This patch add's the defines for port d I/Os on AT91RM9200 (BGA package) > > Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig > --- applied will you send a board that use it soon? Best Regards, J. ___ U-Boot mailing list

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V4] cmd_bdinfo: move implementation to arch instead of common

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
introduce 3 new weak functions board_bdinfo, cpu_bdinfo and soc_bdinfo to allow board, cpu and soc to print more information Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Acked-by: Mike Frysinger Ack-by: Haavard Skinnemoen --- Change from V3 SOC weak function and Mike Suggestion Best Regards

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] bdinfo: coding style cleanup

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- common/cmd_bdinfo.c |6 - lib_arm/bdinfo.c| 10 lib_avr32/bdinfo.c | 16 +++--- lib_i386/bdinfo.c | 16 +++--- lib_m68k/bdinfo.c | 32 ++-- lib_microbl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 V3] cmd_bdinfo: move implementation to arch instead of common

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:22 Mon 23 Feb , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > introduce two new weak functions board_bdinfo and cpu_bdinfo to allow > > board and cpu to print more information > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] PXA: timer use do_div and simplify it

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- cpu/pxa/interrupts.c | 46 -- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/pxa/interrupts.c b/cpu/pxa/interrupts.c index 40d8bf2..2bc5c50 100644 --- a/cpu/pxa/interrupts.c +++

Re: [U-Boot] PXA build failure

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:58 Mon 23 Feb , Sergey Lapin wrote: > Hi, all! > > I am used to build at91 board using Angstrom EABI toolchain (gcc-4.2.4) > without any problems. Now I try to build PXA board and have the > following error on final link stage: (I build master branch) > > cd /home/slapin/u-boot && > ~/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9 v4] ARM: add an "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 13:34 Mon 23 Feb , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > The "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board has an OLED display, using a > s6e63d6 display controller on the first SPI interface, using GPIO57 as a > chip-select for it. With this configuration you can display 256 colour BMP > images in 16-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 v3] i.MX31: add a simple gpio driver

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> >> +static unsigned long gpio_ports[] = { > >> + [0] = 0x53fcc000, > >> + [1] = 0x53fd, > >> + [2] = 0x53fa4000, > >> +}; > > I'll add qong patch before yours > > please fix it > > there is v4 of this patch: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-February/047097.html > > Jean-Ch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 v4] i.MX31: fix SPI driver for shorter than 32 bit

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:05 Mon 23 Feb , Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 00:09 Sat 07 Feb , Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > >> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski > >> > >> Fix setting the SPI Control register, 8 and 16-bit transfers > >> and a wrong pointer in the free rout

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 v3] i.MX31: add a simple gpio driver

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:58 Mon 23 Feb , Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 10:37 Fri 06 Feb , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> This is a minimal driver, so far only managing output. It will > >> be used by the mxc_spi.c driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Lia

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Timur Tabi
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- Could you add a description that says what I2C mux support is? That would make it easier to review this patch. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale __

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Some PCIe patches for MPC83xx

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:19:43 +0300 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are some PCI-E fixes and a patch that adds PCI-E support for > MPC837XERDB boards. applied 1-7. Thanks Anton. Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.

[U-Boot] Clock handling (wasRe: [PATCH 6/7 v2] OMAP3: Add OMAP3 core changes for MUSB)

2009-02-23 Thread Nishanth Menon
Wolfgang Denk said the following on 02/23/2009 11:36 PM: > >> Comparing having all clock initialization at a central point (clock.c) - >> which seems simple vs having get-put kind of clock apis in U-boot : I >> > > But the explicit rule is only to enable interfaces (and this includes > clocks)

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
Wolfgang, please pull what is primarily PCIe support for the 837xRDB: The following changes since commit 32688e572ff96715b41420e9a7f280db6c399b65: Wolfgang Denk (1): Update CHANGELOG; Prepare 2009.03-rc1 are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9 v3] 83xx: add missing TIMING_CFG1_CASLAT_* defines

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:17 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > this patch is in u-boot-mpc83xx.git, but still again posted, > because it is not yet gone in mainline, and I need this patch > to get the following patch 7/9 compiled so rebase the patchseries on th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:09 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c.c | 24 +++- > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c.c > index ce646fd..5242884 10

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] 83xx, i2c: add mux support for fsl_i2c

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:09 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > @@ -369,6 +370,23 @@ i2c_probe(uchar chip) > > int i2c_set_bus_num(unsigned int bus) > { > +#if defined(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) > + if (bus < CONFIG_SYS_MAX_I2C_BUS) { > + i2c_bus_num = bus; > + } else { [1] > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9 v3] 83xx, kmeter1: add I2C, dtt, eeprom support

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:24:05 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > This patch adds I2C support for the Keymile kmeter1 board. > It uses the First I2C Controller from the CPU, for > accessing 4 temperature sensors, an eeprom with IVM data > and the booteeprom over a pca9547 mux. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - net

2009-02-23 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Ben Warren, > > In message <49a255af.8030...@gmail.com> you wrote: > >> Wolfgang, >> >> The following changes since commit 32688e572ff96715b41420e9a7f280db6c399b65: >> >> Wolfgang Denk (1): >> >> Update CHANGELOG; Prepare 2009.03-rc1 >> >> are available in

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim, In message <20090223154208.d3712e54.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote: ... > ...here. And Anton's are the latest submitted to the list and I > intend on picking them up and sending you a pull request soon. Thanks for the detailed report. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Soft

Re: [U-Boot] PXA build failure

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sergey Lapin, In message <20090223195848.ga23...@build.ossfans.org> you wrote: > Hi, all! > > I am used to build at91 board using Angstrom EABI toolchain (gcc-4.2.4) > without any problems. Now I try to build PXA board and have the > following error on final link stage: (I build master branc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jon Loeliger, In message <49a30b1c@freescale.com> you wrote: > Becky Bruce wrote: > > Currently, we get 256MB as the default, but since all the 86xx > > board configs define a 2G BAT mapping for RAM, raise default > > to 2G. > > > > Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce > > --- > > Oh, OK, consid

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Becky Bruce, In message <1235419011-22472-1-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > Currently, we get 256MB as the default, but since all the 86xx > board configs define a 2G BAT mapping for RAM, raise default > to 2G. > > Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce > --- > include/asm-ppc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate 36-bit addr map in boot messages

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Becky Bruce, In message <1234457012-31301-1-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > If 36-bit addressing is enabled, print a message on the console > when we boot. > > Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce > --- > board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c |3 +++ > 1 files change

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] ppc4xx: Abort autoboot only by space key on CPCI405 boards

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <200902231653.23766...@denx.de> you wrote: > On Friday 20 February 2009, matthias.fu...@esd.eu wrote: > > From: Matthias Fuchs > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs > > All patches applied to ppc4xx/next. Thanks. Feel free to send a pull request for the next branc

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: PPC4xx

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <200902231551.40483...@denx.de> you wrote: > > All those patches are better placed in "next". I'll put them into a=20 > ppc4xx/next branch in a short while. Understood, thanks. Please feel free to send a pull request for the "next" branch any time you think appropri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] A driver for the S6E63D6 SPI display controller from Samsung

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe, In message <49a2a105.6070...@denx.de> Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > > Do you plan to send a pull request soon? Please do - I would like to > > have a v2009.03-rc1 out soon. Thanks. > > I'm still waiting for ACK for patches 1/9 v4, 2/9 v4, 9/9 v4 from this > series. I'm go

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7 v2] OMAP3: Add OMAP3 core changes for MUSB

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nishanth Menon, In message <49a296f0.4000...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > He probably wants to say that clocks should be enabled only when "usb > > start" is issued, as you might have u-boot compiled with USB defines > > set, but never actually use USB. Correct. > Comparing having all clock

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] Add FSL "Can use" framework

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:56:50 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Anton Vorontsov, > > In message <20090219154545.gb26...@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> you wrote: > > So far it's used for specifying whether we want to use FSL DR USB or > > FSL eSDHC devices on MPC837X processors. > > > > There are two mor

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: AVR32

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Haavard Skinnemoen, In message <20090223100951.62e26...@hskinnemoen-d830> you wrote: > > > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > > you please have a look... > > Sure. Would those patches be acceptable now or should I hold them off > until the next merge windo

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Kim Phillips
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:00:14 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > 8xxx: > 11/06 Anton Vorontsov[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: increase BOOTMAPSZ to 16MB this is apparently pending resubmission from its a

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - net

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ben Warren, In message <49a255af.8030...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Wolfgang, > > The following changes since commit 32688e572ff96715b41420e9a7f280db6c399b65: > > Wolfgang Denk (1): > > Update CHANGELOG; Prepare 2009.03-rc1 > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://

[U-Boot] bootvx on MPC8572

2009-02-23 Thread Robert Rzepiela
Hello I am running u-boot.2009.01 on DS-8572 (whitefin). I use tftpboot to download an elf image (from vxWorks release for the eval) and try to run it with "bootx". After messages about loading text etc etc. the board hangs right after printing "Starting vxWorks at ...". I am using default boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default

2009-02-23 Thread Jon Loeliger
Becky Bruce wrote: > Currently, we get 256MB as the default, but since all the 86xx > board configs define a 2G BAT mapping for RAM, raise default > to 2G. > > Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce > --- Oh, OK, consider it... Acked-by: Jon Loeliger for real. Thanks, jdl __

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Jon Loeliger
Becky Bruce wrote: > This one should still apply and needs to be picked up, WD can pick it up > directly because it's very small: > >>> 02/12 Becky Bruce[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate >>> 36-bit addr map in boot messages OK, sounds fine by me. Thanks. > The second one looks

Re: [U-Boot] PXA build failure

2009-02-23 Thread Sergey Lapin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:58:48PM +0300, Sergey Lapin wrote: > Hi, all! > > I am used to build at91 board using Angstrom EABI toolchain (gcc-4.2.4) > without any problems. Now I try to build PXA board and have the > following error on final link stage: (I build master branch) [skip] I've also f

[U-Boot] Doctor Database

2009-02-23 Thread
Practicing Physicians in the USA Lots of Physicians in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology, Dermatology, Neurology, General Practice etc.. you can sort by many different fields like city, state or zip Dramatic cost reduction: $399 {}{}{} Take all 4 items below for F REE when you

[U-Boot] PXA build failure

2009-02-23 Thread Sergey Lapin
Hi, all! I am used to build at91 board using Angstrom EABI toolchain (gcc-4.2.4) without any problems. Now I try to build PXA board and have the following error on final link stage: (I build master branch) cd /home/slapin/u-boot && ~/openedhand/tmp/cross/bin/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-ld -Bstati

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Becky Bruce
OK, I have resubmitted the MAX_MEM_MAPPED patch to apply to the current master u-boot tree. -Becky On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Becky Bruce wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > >> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Kim, Andy & Jon, >>> >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default

2009-02-23 Thread Becky Bruce
Currently, we get 256MB as the default, but since all the 86xx board configs define a 2G BAT mapping for RAM, raise default to 2G. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce --- include/asm-ppc/config.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/config.h b/include/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7 v2] OMAP3: Add OMAP3 core changes for MUSB

2009-02-23 Thread Dirk Behme
Nishanth Menon wrote: > Grazvydas Ignotas said the following on 02/23/2009 02:13 PM: > +#ifdef CONFIG_MUSB > +/* Enable the MUSB interface clock */ > +sr32(&prcm_base->iclken1_core, 4, 1, 0x1); > +#endif > the design of u-boot is to enagle the IP only when

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [85xx] Add eTSEC 1/2 IO override control definition

2009-02-23 Thread ksi
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:42 PM, k...@koi8.net wrote: > > > This adds missing tsec12ioovcr to include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h. It was > > named "res14" (for "reserved") while tsec34ioovcr was properly there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn > > --- >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [85xx] Add eTSEC 1/2 IO override control (corrected)

2009-02-23 Thread ksi
This adds tsec12ioovcr to include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h (was reserved.) Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn --- diff -purN u-boot.orig/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h u-boot/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h --- u-boot.orig/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h2009-02-19 13:39:31.0 -0800 +++ u-boot/includ

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Becky Bruce
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Kim, Andy & Jon, >> >> I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could >> you please have a look... >> >> 8xxx: > >> 02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [85xx] Add eTSEC 1/2 IO override control definition

2009-02-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:42 PM, k...@koi8.net wrote: > This adds missing tsec12ioovcr to include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h. It was > named "res14" (for "reserved") while tsec34ioovcr was properly there. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn > --- > diff -purN u-boot.orig/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h u-boo

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [85xx] Add eTSEC 1/2 IO override control definition

2009-02-23 Thread ksi
This adds missing tsec12ioovcr to include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h. It was named "res14" (for "reserved") while tsec34ioovcr was properly there. Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn --- diff -purN u-boot.orig/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h u-boot/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h --- u-boot.orig/include/asm-ppc/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] net: Add Xilinx LL Temac driver version2

2009-02-23 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Michal, Michal Simek wrote: >> All of the above mentioned issues are ones that I could easily deal >> with, but one thing that really does need to change is that you need to >> use the CONFIG_NET_MULTI API. In other words, your driver should have a >> single initialize() function (prototyped

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kim, Andy & Jon, > > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > 8xxx: > 02/04 Jon Loeliger Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mpc86xx: Add support to > populate addr map based on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] smc911x: split out useful defines/functions into local header

2009-02-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 23 February 2009 10:44:04 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > The smc911x driver has a lot of useful defines/functions which can be > > > used by pieces of code (such as example eeprom programmers)

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Support for PXA27X UDC.

2009-02-23 Thread Vivek Kutal
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kutal --- drivers/serial/usbtty.h |4 +- drivers/usb/Makefile|1 + drivers/usb/usbdcore_pxa27x.c | 712 +++ include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h | 337 + include/usbdcore_pxa27x.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Replaced endpoint numbers with appropriate macros in usbtty.c.

2009-02-23 Thread Vivek Kutal
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kutal --- drivers/serial/usbtty.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/usbtty.c b/drivers/serial/usbtty.c index 2624e6f..d8b1387 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/usbtty.c +++ b/drivers/serial/usbtty.c @@ -215,7 +215,7 @

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] ppc4xx: Abort autoboot only by space key on CPCI405 boards

2009-02-23 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 20 February 2009, matthias.fu...@esd.eu wrote: > From: Matthias Fuchs > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs All patches applied to ppc4xx/next. Thanks. Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfg

[U-Boot] [PATCH/next branch] ppc4xx: Don't write the MAC address into the internal SoC registers

2009-02-23 Thread Stefan Roese
Remove this code. It's not needed. The 4xx EMAC driver stores the MAC addresses into the SoC registers instead. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese --- cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c | 29 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/

[U-Boot] [PATCH/next branch] powerpc: Only use eth_getenv_enetaddr() if networking is enabled

2009-02-23 Thread Stefan Roese
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese --- lib_ppc/board.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_ppc/board.c b/lib_ppc/board.c index f1b62f5..fc3cef6 100644 --- a/lib_ppc/board.c +++ b/lib_ppc/board.c @@ -888,8 +888,10 @@ void board_init_r (gd_t *id, ulong dest_addr)

[U-Boot] [PATCH/next branch] powerpc: Fix compilation warning in board.c

2009-02-23 Thread Stefan Roese
Fix this warning: board.c: In function 'board_init_r': board.c:653: warning: unused variable 'i' board.c:651: warning: unused variable 'e' Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese --- lib_ppc/board.c |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib_ppc/board.c b/lib_ppc/board.c

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: ARM, AT91, IXP, PXA

2009-02-23 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe, > > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > ARM, AT91: > > 04/24 michael[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 0/2] Ide support > 04/24 michael[

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] smc911x: split out useful defines/functions into local header

2009-02-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 February 2009 10:44:04 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The smc911x driver has a lot of useful defines/functions which can be > > used by pieces of code (such as example eeprom programmers). Rather than > > forcing each place to duplicate t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] smc911x: split out useful defines/functions into local header

2009-02-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > The smc911x driver has a lot of useful defines/functions which can be used > by pieces of code (such as example eeprom programmers). Rather than > forcing each place to duplicate these defines/functions, split them out > of the smdc911x driver into a l

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] smc911x: split out useful defines/functions into local header

2009-02-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
The smc911x driver has a lot of useful defines/functions which can be used by pieces of code (such as example eeprom programmers). Rather than forcing each place to duplicate these defines/functions, split them out of the smdc911x driver into a local header. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger CC: Sas

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: PPC4xx

2009-02-23 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Wolfgang, On Sunday 22 February 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > PPC4xx: > 02/20 matthias.fu...@es  [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] ppc4xx: Cleanup linker > scripts of esd 4xx boards All those patches are bett

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 V3] cmd_bdinfo: move implementation to arch instead of common

2009-02-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 February 2009 03:22:55 Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > introduce two new weak functions board_bdinfo and cpu_bdinfo to allow > > board and cpu to print more information > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > Cc: Haavard Skin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] net: Add Xilinx LL Temac driver version2

2009-02-23 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Ben, > Hi Michal, > > You submitted this so long ago that this driver should be in the tree > right now. Unfortunately, I didn't give a thorough enough review the > first time and I think it would be wrong to pull it in right now without > addressing some more things. If you take care of thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 v3] A driver for the S6E63D6 SPI display controller from Samsung

2009-02-23 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Anatolij, > > In message <498c596b.2030...@denx.de> you wrote: >> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >>> This is a driver for the S6E63D6 SPI OLED display controller from Samsung. >>> It only provides access to controller's registers so the client can freely >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9 v4] ARM: add an "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board

2009-02-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
The "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board has an OLED display, using a s6e63d6 display controller on the first SPI interface, using GPIO57 as a chip-select for it. With this configuration you can display 256 colour BMP images in 16-bit RGB (RGB565) LCD mode. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7 v2] OMAP3: Add OMAP3 core changes for MUSB

2009-02-23 Thread Nishanth Menon
Grazvydas Ignotas said the following on 02/23/2009 02:13 PM: +#ifdef CONFIG_MUSB +/* Enable the MUSB interface clock */ +sr32(&prcm_base->iclken1_core, 4, 1, 0x1); +#endif >>> the design of u-boot is to enagle the IP only when he use it >>> so please do not

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Lawnick
rudresh said the following: [quoting repaired] > Michael Lawnick wrote: >> >> rudresh said the following: >>> i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , >>> NOR >>> Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command >>> the u-boot is erased. i'm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7 v2] OMAP3: Add OMAP3 core changes for MUSB

2009-02-23 Thread Grazvydas Ignotas
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe, > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 19:55 Thu 12 Feb , Dirk Behme wrote: >>> OMAP3 core changes necessary for MUSB >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme >>> >>> --- >>> Note: OMAP3 USB code will be sent later

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9 v3] ARM: add an "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board

2009-02-23 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Guennadi, On Friday 06 February 2009 10:38:01 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > The "eet" variant of the imx31_phycore board has an OLED display, using a > s6e63d6 display controller on the first SPI interface, using GPIO57 as a > chip-select for it. With this configuration you can display 256

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear rudresh, In message <22160018.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote: > > same u-boot-1.3.0 working in other customize MPC8313 board with some v1.3.0 is old and you will probably find very few people here who are willing to spend (or actually waste) their time on problems that most probably have b

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread rudresh
same u-boot-1.3.0 working in other customize MPC8313 board with some different peripherals, NOR flash of 16MB is same in both the case .. but the MPC8313 evaluation board having 256MB NAND flash.. why not u-boot-1.3.0 is not working in evaluation board.. wd wrote: > > Dear rudresh, > > In mes

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread rudresh
Details are as follows .. the flash size 16Mbyte Nor flash.. NAND flash 256MB. /* * Environment */ #if defined(CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT) #define CFG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND 1 #define CFG_ENV_SIZECFG_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE #define CFG_ENV_OFFSET ((1024<<10) - (CFG_NA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX31: fir imx31_phycore to work after Linux reboot

2009-02-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:32:33PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski, > > > > In message you wrote: > > > > > > > In message you wrote: > > > > > Upon power on i.MX31 enables most peripheral clocks, Linux disables >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 v4] i.MX31: fix SPI driver for shorter than 32 bit

2009-02-23 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 00:09 Sat 07 Feb , Anatolij Gustschin wrote: >> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski >> >> Fix setting the SPI Control register, 8 and 16-bit transfers >> and a wrong pointer in the free routine in the mxc_spi driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovet

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 v3] i.MX31: add a simple gpio driver

2009-02-23 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 10:37 Fri 06 Feb , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> This is a minimal driver, so far only managing output. It will >> be used by the mxc_spi.c driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski >> --- >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mx31_gpio.c b/driv

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX31: fir imx31_phycore to work after Linux reboot

2009-02-23 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi, On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:32:33PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski, > > In message you wrote: > > > > > In message you wrote: > > > > Upon power on i.MX31 enables most peripheral clocks, Linux disables the > > > > ones > > > > > > Why does U-Boot do that? > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add 16bpp BMP support

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Mark Jackson wrote: > Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > Mark Jackson wrote: > >>> We do NOT want to do everything that is possible, but only what is > >>> reasonable. > >> Exactly ... otherwise where do you stop ? JPG, GIF, TIFF, PNG, etc ? > >> We're *only* meant to be showing a simply boot up

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v2] Setup extra MIMC200 chip selects

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Mark Jackson wrote: > Added code to setup the extra Flash and FRAM chip selects as used on the > MIMC200 board. > > V2 moves the init code from the common "cpu.c" file into the board specific > setup file. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson Applied to mimc200 after fixing up some whitespace dama

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MIMC200: tidy GCLK init code

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Mark Jackson wrote: > Change the MIMC200 startup code to use the built-in (rather than > hard-coded) funtions for setting up gclk outputs. > > We'll also move the code to the new, more-appropriate > board_postclk_init() routine. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson Applied to mimc200 and merged into

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] AVR32: Must add NOPs after disabling interrupts for AT32UC3A0512ES

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Gunnar Rangoy wrote: > From: Olav Morken > > The AT32UC3A0512ES chip has a bug when disabling interrupts. As a > workaround, two NOPs can be inserted. > > Signed-off-by: Gunnar Rangoy > Signed-off-by: Paul Driveklepp > Signed-off-by: Olav Morken Applied to evk1100-prep, thanks. Haavard

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] AVR32: Make GPIO implmentation cpu dependent

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Gunnar Rangoy wrote: > There are some differences in the implementation of GPIO in the > at32uc chip compared to the ap700x series. > > Signed-off-by: Gunnar Rangoy > Signed-off-by: Paul Driveklepp > Signed-off-by: Olav Morken Applied to evk1100-prep, thanks. Haavard _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/9] AVR32: Move addrspace.h to arch-directory, and move some functions from io.h to addrspace.h

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Gunnar Rangoy wrote: > From: Olav Morken > > The AVR32A architecture (which AT32UC3A-series is based on) has a > different memory layout than the AVR32B-architecture. This patch moves > addrspace.h to an arch-dependent directory in preparation for > AT32UC3A-support. It also moves some address-sp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/9] AVR32: Make cacheflush cpu-dependent

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Gunnar Rangoy wrote: > From: Olav Morken > > The AT32UC3A series of processors doesn't contain any cache, and issuing > cache control instructions on those will cause an exception. This commit > makes cacheflush.h arch-dependent in preparation for the AT32UC3A-support. > > Signed-off-by: Gunnar

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Digest, Vol 9, Issue 275

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Griffin, In message <1235312940.26727.2.ca...@quercus-bis> you wrote: > > > > i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , NOR > > Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command > > the u-boot is erased. i'm not able to fix this i

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear rudresh, In message <22156928.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote: > > i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , NOR > Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command > the u-boot is erased. i'm not able to fix this issue. help me to fix

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: AVR32

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... Sure. Would those patches be acceptable now or should I hold them off until the next merge window? Haavard ___ U-Boot mailing list U-

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

2009-02-23 Thread Pieter
Dear Wolfgang Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kim, Andy & Jon, > > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > 8xxx: > 11/06 Anton Vorontsov[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: increase BOOTMAPSZ to 16MB > 12/11 Paul Gortmaker [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 V3] cmd_bdinfo: move implementation to arch instead of common

2009-02-23 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > introduce two new weak functions board_bdinfo and cpu_bdinfo to allow > board and cpu to print more information > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen > Cc: Mike Frysinger > --- > rebase for-next > Precedent version

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Digest, Vol 9, Issue 275

2009-02-23 Thread Peter Griffin
> i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , NOR > Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command > the u-boot is erased. i'm not able to fix this issue. help me to fix this > issue > On my board this was due to CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN not

Re: [U-Boot] saveenv command erases flash u-boot

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Lawnick
rudresh said the following: > i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , NOR > Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command > the u-boot is erased. i'm not able to fix this issue. help me to fix this > issue Sounds U-Boot and environment

  1   2   >