Re: [U-Boot] NET: Updated SMSC LAN9x1x EEPROM program?

2008-10-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 08 September 2008, Magnus Lilja wrote: > Is there an up to date smsc9111x_eeprom.c floating around somewhere? I > found Mike Frysinger's post from March '08 but it needs updating to > compile and work with current mainline U-boot, has anyone already done > this? i looked at updating it a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] lcd: Let the board code show board-specific info

2008-10-25 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > The information displayed when CONFIG_LCD_INFO is set is inherently > board-specific, so it should be done by the board code. The current code > dealing with this only handles two cases, and is already a horrible mess > of #ifdeffery. > > Yes, this duplicates some code,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] lcd: Set lcd_is_enabled before clearing the screen

2008-10-25 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > This allows the logo/info rendering routines to use the regular > lcd_putc/lcd_puts/lcd_printf calls. > > Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied to u-boot-video/master repo. Thanks. Best regards, Anatolij -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] lcd: Implement lcd_printf()

2008-10-25 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > lcd_printf() has a prototype in include/lcd.h but no implementation. Fix > this by borrowing the lcd_printf() implementation from the cogent board > code (which appears to use its own LCD framework.) > > Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] atmel_lcdfb: Straighten out funky vl_sync logic

2008-10-25 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > If the board _didn't_ request INVLINE_INVERTED, we set INVLINE_INVERTED, > otherwise we don't. WTF? > > Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied to u-boot-video/master repo. Thanks. Best regards, Anatolij -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] atmel_lcdfb: Eliminate unneeded #include

2008-10-25 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > atmel_lcdfb doesn't actually need anything from asm/arch/hardware.h. It > includes a file that does, asm/arch/gpio.h, but this file doesn't > include like it's supposed to. > > Add the missing include to asm/arch/gpio.h and remove the workaround > from the atmel_lcdfb

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Move the clear_tlbs before MMU turn on

2008-10-25 Thread Dave Liu
We must invalidate TLBs before MMU turn on, but currently the code is not, if there are some stale TLB entry valid in the TLBs, it will cause strange issue. Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/mpc86xx/start.S |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --g