Re: [twsocket] UDP Hole Punching

2008-03-04 Thread Dave Baxter
"NAT Traversal" is well documented, but "less than easy" to make work from scratch But why bother rolling your own? Just download and use Hamachi. (Google for it) Even the free one will start automaticaly when Winderz boots, then you have a UDP based secure VPN between 2 (or more) sites. Jus

[twsocket] .send after a .connect using UDP

2008-03-04 Thread Dod
Hello, Using TCP the MySocket.Send must be done inside an OnSessionConnected event and not follow the .Connect or it will fail with "not connected error", this is the way async works and it's OK. Using UDP I usually do the same scheme, but as UDP has no real connection mode, the OnSessi

Re: [twsocket] .send after a .connect using UDP

2008-03-04 Thread Dod
Hello Wilfried, And I can also do a .free immediately after the .send ? >> So may I use MySocket.Send following immediate MySocket.Connect safely WM> Yes using UDP you can do that without any problem. WM> --- WM> Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS] WM> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html WM>

Re: [twsocket] .send after a .connect using UDP

2008-03-04 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Dod, > So may I use MySocket.Send following immediate MySocket.Connect safely Yes using UDP you can do that without any problem. --- Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html http://www.mestdagh.biz -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket ma

Re: [twsocket] .send after a .connect using UDP

2008-03-04 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Dod, > And I can also do a .free immediately after the .send ? good question :) I think so yes because of the nature of UDP --- Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html http://www.mestdagh.biz -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing

Re: [twsocket] UDP Hole Punching

2008-03-04 Thread wayne forrest
Dave, maybe I as not all that clear on my Specification: My ICS Clients will be Mobile PHones MIDP2.0, therefor I do not think Hamatchi will work, or would it ? On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Dave Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "NAT Traversal" is well documented, but "less than easy" to ma