Re: [twsocket] TWSocket Digest, Vol 321, Issue 4

2009-05-14 Thread Robert Chafer
There are people who write C++ without knowing bits of syntax like 'break'? On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:22:20 +0200, you wrote: > Ole Braad-Sørensen wrote: > > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:01 +, you wrote: > > > >> Possibly you need breaks? :-) > >> > >> switch(RqType) > >> { > >> case s

Re: [twsocket] TWSocket Digest, Vol 321, Issue 4

2009-05-14 Thread Piotr Dałek
Hello! > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:01 +, you wrote: >>Possibly you need breaks? :-) >> >>switch(RqType) >> { >> case smtpConnect: SMTP->Helo(); break; >> case smtpHelo: SMTP->MailFrom(); break; >> case smtpEhlo: SMTP->Auth(); break; >> case smtpAuth: SMTP->Ma

Re: [twsocket] TWSocket Digest, Vol 321, Issue 4

2009-05-14 Thread Arno Garrels
Ole Braad-Sørensen wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:01 +, you wrote: > >> Possibly you need breaks? :-) >> >> switch(RqType) >> { >> case smtpConnect: SMTP->Helo(); break; >> case smtpHelo: SMTP->MailFrom(); break; >> case smtpEhlo: SMTP->Auth(); break; >> case smtpAuth:

Re: [twsocket] TWSocket Digest, Vol 321, Issue 4

2009-05-13 Thread Ole Braad-Sørensen
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:01 +, you wrote: >Possibly you need breaks? :-) > >switch(RqType) > { > case smtpConnect: SMTP->Helo(); break; > case smtpHelo: SMTP->MailFrom(); break; > casesmtpEhlo: SMTP->Auth(); break; > casesmtpAuth: SMTP->MailFrom(); break;