There are people who write C++ without knowing bits of syntax like 'break'?
On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:22:20 +0200, you wrote: > Ole Braad-Sørensen wrote: > > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:01 +0000, you wrote: > > > >> Possibly you need breaks? :-) > >> > >> switch(RqType) > >> { > >> case smtpConnect: SMTP->Helo(); break; > >> case smtpHelo: SMTP->MailFrom(); break; > >> case smtpEhlo: SMTP->Auth(); break; > >> case smtpAuth: SMTP->MailFrom(); break; > >> case smtpMailFrom: SMTP->RcptTo(); break; > >> case smtpRcptTo: SMTP->Data(); break; > >> case smtpData: SMTP->Quit(); break; > >> } > > > > No. Tried this too. > > Really? > > > The breaks has no effect in this "switch" > > ( No "default" value ) > -- Robert Chafer Silverfrost Limited Office: +44 (0)161 795 1980 Email: r...@silverfrost.com Web: http://www.silverfrost.com The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. To any recipient of this message within Silverfrost, unless otherwise stated, you should consider this message and attachments as Silverfrost confidential. Silverfrost Limited is registered in England, Company Number 3447013, 4 Coulsden Drive, Manchester, M9 6AP, United Kingdom. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be