> I know many people running tiny, fast applications on their old
> 9x boxes successfully, why throw them away? Some even use them as
> mail servers (i.e. Mercury32) or as NAT routers etc.
Agreed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> OK, but why loading additional libraries when the same can be
>> achieved by using winsock2?
>> WSAIoctl/SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST should work even in W95
>
> Winsock2 is an additional library, just a different additional
> library to IpHlpApi.
Not rea
> I believe for common tasks that would require many developers to do
> the same thing, there should be common code in the component set.
> Thinking otherwise is not productive.
Rubbish. This passive IP NAT stuff is hardly common, otherwise this
mailing list would be full of requests for it.
> OK, but why loading additional libraries when the same can be
> achieved by using winsock2?
> WSAIoctl/SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST should work even in W95
It's new development, you wanted a simple solution. Winsock2 is an
additional library, just a different additional library to IpHlpApi.
No-
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> Currently I just want a simple and fast check whether a peer
>> address is in the subnet in a FTP server I'm currently working on.
>
> The simple solution is to create an event with a true/false response,
> and let the application do the hard work.
I believe for common tasks that would require many developers to do
the same thing, there should be common code in the component set.
Thinking otherwise is not productive.
Regards,
SubZero
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:33 +0100 (BST), Angus Robertson - Magenta
Systems Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Currently I just want a simple and fast check whether a peer
> address is in the subnet in a FTP server I'm currently working on.
The simple solution is to create an event with a true/false response,
and let the application do the hard work. The application can then use
either WMI or IpHelp
Francois Piette wrote:
> Maybe creating a new OverbyteIcsWinsock2.pas file with all stuff
> specific to winsock2 would be a good idea ?
Yeah, something for the ToDo list. Currently I just want a simple and
fast check whether a peer address is in the subnet in a FTP server I'm
currently working on.
, freeware)
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP server, problem with property PasvIpAddr
> Francois PIETTE wr
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>> Searching MSDN for SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST report a few hits. But
>>> WSAIoctl doesn't lit it !
>>
>> Thanks I'll investigate more in this, my idea was to incude an
>> utility function something like IsSameSubnet(IP: TInAddr): Boolean in
>> WSocket.pas provided that it mu
>> Searching MSDN for SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST report a few hits. But
>> WSAIoctl doesn't lit it !
>
> Thanks I'll investigate more in this, my idea was to incude an utility
> function something like IsSameSubnet(IP: TInAddr): Boolean in
> WSocket.pas provided that it must not use IpHlpApi, supported
te.be
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP server, problem with property PasvIpAddr
>
>
>> Fra
omponent Suite, freeware)
Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware)
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP server
e
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP server, problem with property PasvIpAddr
>
>
>> I nee
rels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP server, problem with property PasvIpAddr
> I need to check for the same subnet instead of
> private IPs, sometimes I'm too slow :)
>
> Arno
I need to check for the same subnet instead of
private IPs, sometimes I'm too slow :)
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
>> Or modify the FTP server component in a way that
>> PasvIpAddr can be set privately for a particular client
>> depending on it's source IP (just an idea?).
>
> I
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Or modify the FTP server component in a way that
> PasvIpAddr can be set privately for a particular client
> depending on it's source IP (just an idea?).
I need such an option as well. So I just changed the code
as mentioned above. New option ftpsNoPasvIpAddrInLan and
a funct
17 matches
Mail list logo
