I'm using the FTPTST demo and am having a problem with uploading a file. I
have a zip file on my system that is 1.21 MB (1,271,701 bytes). When I click
CONNECT and then PUT in the demo program I get the output below. The numbers
look great on this end but if I go to the server it shows me that the
> You probably forgot to call TypeSet after setting binary/text mode.
Yup, about 2 minutes after I sent this message out I figured that out.
Thanks!
Harold
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our
- Original Message -
From: "Harold Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:01 PM
Subject: [twsocket] FTP Question
> I'm using the FTPTST demo and am having a problem with uploading a file. I
> have a zip file on
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> bug reports that may have to do with hardware DEP enabled on my
>> executables
>
> I had a similar problem, which turned out to be the Petite executable
> compressor, but a new version was done within 24 hours of my report.
It's my impression that X
> bug reports that may have to do with hardware DEP enabled on my
> executables
I had a similar problem, which turned out to be the Petite executable
compressor, but a new version was done within 24 hours of my report.
> BTW: In my X509 snapshot I sent recently a dfm was missing
Yes, got dist
> Do you have a dual/dual core 64bit box (hardware DEP capable)?
> I'm looking for someone who could do a small test of one of my apps.
It's on my shopping list, once a rather slow paying client sends some
money. An Asus P5WD2 MB and a Pentium D, but I don't plan on using a
64-bit OS for some
> > An unrelated question. WinPcap shows a vast number of packets being
> > broadcast around my network with an ethernet protocol of x88AD,
which
> > is not in documents I can find, nor does Ethereal describe it. Not
> > quite sure which MAC address is sending them, but some MACs are
> > rep
Arno Garrels a écrit :
> It's the same with ethereal.
Are you uncheck the : capture packet in promiscuous mode ?
I see all the traffic.
Olivier
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at htt
olivier-serveur wrote:
> Arno Garrels a écrit :
>
>> I've tested some sniffers with and without WinPCap (W2K SP4), but they
>> all are not capable to capture local traffic (at least on my box).
>> Is this normal?
> Are you try : ethereal ? (www.ethereal.com/)
It's the same with ethereal.
Arno Ga
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> I've tested some sniffers with and without WinPCap (W2K SP4), but they
>> all are not capable to capture local traffic (at least on my box).
>> Is this normal?
>
> It does seem to be the case.
>
> Raw sockets monitors a specific IP address, but pres
> An unrelated question. WinPcap shows a vast number of packets being
> broadcast around my network with an ethernet protocol of x88AD, which
> is not in documents I can find, nor does Ethereal describe it. Not
> quite sure which MAC address is sending them, but some MACs are
> replying. Has
> I've tested some sniffers with and without WinPCap (W2K SP4), but they
> all are not capable to capture local traffic (at least on my box).
> Is this normal?
It does seem to be the case.
Raw sockets monitors a specific IP address, but presumably the routing
table bypasses this if the IP a
Francois Piette wrote:
>>> Using a sniffer, can you see the command passing on the network ?
>> Can you recommend a certain sniffer?
>
> Well, I tried with the sniffer I use (LanWatch, an old commercial
> product). But it doesn't see trafic on localhost.
>
>> Or is it possible to monitor local tr
Arno Garrels a écrit :
> I've tested some sniffers with and without WinPCap (W2K SP4), but they all
> are not capable to capture local traffic (at least on my box).
> Is this normal?
Are you try : ethereal ? (www.ethereal.com/)
And, are you try in passive mode ?
Olivier
--
To unsubscribe or ch
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> Can you recommend a certain sniffer?
>> Or is it possible to monitor local traffic with raw sockets?
>
> My Socket Monitor ICS component will be ready later today or tomorrow,
> it uses both ICS raw sockets and WinPcap.
Great!
> There are 'sniffer
> Can you recommend a certain sniffer?
> Or is it possible to monitor local traffic with raw sockets?
My Socket Monitor ICS component will be ready later today or tomorrow,
it uses both ICS raw sockets and WinPcap. There are 'sniffer' and
'statistics' test applications.
However raw sockets o
> > Using a sniffer, can you see the command passing on the network ?
> Can you recommend a certain sniffer?
Well, I tried with the sniffer I use (LanWatch, an old commercial product). But
it doesn't see
trafic on localhost.
> Or is it possible to monitor local traffic with raw sockets?
I don't
ssage -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:11 AM
> Subject: [twsocket] FTP question
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> My FTP client doesn't receive a reply to the
Using a sniffer, can you see the command passing on the network ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: [twsock
Hello,
My FTP client doesn't receive a reply to the type set command from
FTP server GuildFTP when installed on localhost, remotely it works fine.
FileZilla works locally as well as remotely w/o problems.
Is this a client or a server bug??
07/19/2005 21:16:30 > NLST
07/19/2005 21:16:31 < 150 O
20 matches
Mail list logo
