Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Garrels
: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:36 PM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! > > >> It's an idle time-out yes. >> >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>&

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Fastream Technologies
Best Regards, >> >> SZ >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "ICS support mailing" >> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:31 PM >> Subject: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! >&g

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Garrels
ot;Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:31 PM > Subject: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! > > >> i.e. Lancom, I was told that it has an option ConnectionAge to >> specify a connection time

Re: [twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Fastream Technologies
02, 2007 2:31 PM Subject: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! > i.e. Lancom, I was told that it has an option ConnectionAge to specify > a connection time-out. According to the manual the connection will be > closed when the timeout expires. But nothing like that happened. Instead, > af

[twsocket] Don't trust routers!

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Garrels
i.e. Lancom, I was told that it has an option ConnectionAge to specify a connection time-out. According to the manual the connection will be closed when the timeout expires. But nothing like that happened. Instead, after the time-out expired a client application happily sent data that was never ack