It's an idle time-out yes.
Fastream Technologies wrote: > We -in our code- implement/interpret a connection timeout as "idle > timeout". Could this be the case in Lancom as well? > > Best Regards, > > SZ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:31 PM > Subject: [twsocket] Don't trust routers! > > >> i.e. Lancom, I was told that it has an option ConnectionAge to >> specify a connection time-out. According to the manual the >> connection will be closed when the timeout expires. But nothing like >> that happened. Instead, after the time-out expired a client >> application happily sent data that was never acknowledged. >> >> --- >> Arno Garrels [TeamICS] >> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be