instances
Sorry for this post, I was replying the wrong mail.
albert
- Original Message -
From: "A Drent"
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Concurrency of multiple THttpCli instances
> Ok.
>
> T.a.v. he
Sorry for this post, I was replying the wrong mail.
albert
- Original Message -
From: "A Drent"
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Concurrency of multiple THttpCli instances
Ok.
T.a.v. het betalen op re
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Francois PIETTE
wrote:
>
> With reconfiguring (turning off HTML translation) via our program GUI, I
>> have been able to get 3X speed up to 1500 keep-alive requests/sec (when
>> cache is off and this is a web proxy server). So it's getting better but
>> it
With reconfiguring (turning off HTML translation) via our program GUI, I
have been able to get 3X speed up to 1500 keep-alive requests/sec (when
cache is off and this is a web proxy server). So it's getting better but
it
uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of 4 cores is utilized) and our
IC
Ok.
T.a.v. het betalen op rekening, kun je t.a.v. het 'ontwerp' hier nu verder
mee?
vr.gr. Albert
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels"
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Concurrency
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Arno Garrels
> wrote:
>
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>
>>> So
>>> it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
>>> 4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
>>> manager! What
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>
> > So
> > it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
> > 4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
> > manager! What may be preventing it to use 100%?
>
> L
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> So
> it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of
> 4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task
> manager! What may be preventing it to use 100%?
Looks like your instances are running all in the same thread
context,
Hello Arno,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use
> > multi-threads and multi-clients/thread.
>
> Please be more specific, what critical section are you talking
> about? The critical se
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use
> multi-threads and multi-clients/thread.
Please be more specific, what critical section are you talking
about? The critical sections in OverbyteIcsWndControl.pas are
required.
>> I wonder if there is limit
I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use multi-threads
and multi-clients/thread.
SZ
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Fastream Technologies
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if there is limit imposed by the design. The issue I saw during
> our tests is when the cache is disabled (wh
Hello,
I wonder if there is limit imposed by the design. The issue I saw during our
tests is when the cache is disabled (when one THttpCli's instance is used by
the proxy server connection socket), and when the file size is small
(1-10KB), the proxy server cannot use more than one CPU core! When I
12 matches
Mail list logo
