Hello Arno, On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Arno Garrels <arno.garr...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote: > > I suspect it could be a critical section issue since we use > > multi-threads and multi-clients/thread. > > Please be more specific, what critical section are you talking > about? The critical sections in OverbyteIcsWndControl.pas are > required. > > >> I wonder if there is limit imposed by the design. > > I do not think so. > > -- > Arno Garrels > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > With reconfiguring (turning off HTML translation) via our program GUI, I have been able to get 3X speed up to 1500 keep-alive requests/sec (when cache is off and this is a web proxy server). So it's getting better but it uses less than 20% CPU overall (only 1 of 4 cores is utilized) and our ICS-based process uses only 10% in task manager! What may be preventing it to use 100%? We have at least number of CPU-cores of worker threads! Regards, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
