Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer

2006-10-22 Thread Fastream Technologies
Yes. I tried with a 2-years-old version. - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer : Fastream Technologies wrote: : > What about the PASV ports being

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread roger
As Fastream Technologies mentioned UPnp was the way i was looking for and not IPnp as the subject describes actually, as the program i have currently works fine when i configure the web admin for my router. There is plenty of checks inplace within the app to prevent unwanted or malicous attacks but

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Dan
I don't agree. It makes things very convenient for the end user, especially today when a lot of people are behind NAT routers. The only way I can see it being a security hole is if you have some malicious executable running behind your router. If that is the case, the fact it can get your router

Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer

2006-10-22 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: > What about the PASV ports being mixed up? Could this be possible? The > ICS code for old versions prior to manual passive ports -seemed to- > work fine here! Please check that out. Are such older ICS versions realy working fine? Thanks --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] ht

Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer

2006-10-22 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote: > It is best observed with file sizes > 100kb. Do you agree? I do not know, my test files were 3.750 KB. The file offset seemes to be set correctly in ClientRetrSessionConnected, CuteFTP seems to create a temp-file for each part and merges them later. In some of those

Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer

2006-10-22 Thread Fastream Technologies
What about the PASV ports being mixed up? Could this be possible? The ICS code for old versions prior to manual passive ports -seemed to- work fine here! Regards, SZ On 10/22/06, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fastream Technologies wrote: > > It is best observed with file sizes > 100k

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Francois PIETTE
In my opinion, UPnP /is/ a large hole in security. It is disabled on my router. -- Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be - Original Message - From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS suppor

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Fastream Technologies
One addition to your answer: There is a standard called UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) which enables supporting routers to be able to be configured by software (not have to log in via the web interface but they provide some sort of low level web service). This is used for forwarding NAT ports. Reg

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Francois PIETTE
> Is this how somehing like Kazaa works.? This is how any p2p system works. There is are only two possibilities: 1) A given computer can receive incomming connections 2) A given computer cannot receive any incomming connection The case (1) occur when the computer is behind a fixewall, a proxy, a

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread roger
Is this how somehing like Kazaa works.? Thanks - Original Message - From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6 > > So if in those applications pc1 has the mp3 that pc2 wa

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Francois PIETTE
> So if in those applications pc1 has the mp3 that pc2 wants how is the data > transfered.. isn't one uploading and one downloading thus a minimum of one > server needed , sorry for the not understanding.? When no direct connection is possible (for example the user, like me has a NAT router), the

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread roger
So if in those applications pc1 has the mp3 that pc2 wants how is the data transfered.. isn't one uploading and one downloading thus a minimum of one server needed , sorry for the not understanding.? Thanks - Original Message - From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support

Re: [twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread Francois PIETTE
Those applications are client. There is only outgoing connections. -- Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:08 AM Subject:

[twsocket] IP Plug and Play or IPV6

2006-10-22 Thread roger
I am using an app i wrote which opens a http server on each users pc, the app when running registers with the website as online and this obtains the true ip, port used etc. The app allows searches a php driven site to obtain the ip address of a given search criteria and returns the remote users