Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Hello, With FF, after msg3, Sec := FPSFT^.AcceptSecurityContext(@FHCred, pHCtx, @InBuffDesc, ASC_REQ_SEQUENCE_DETECT, // context requirements

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Here is the full log: FireFox 1.5.0.6: 13.09.2006 21:50:09 Connection Opened 13.09.2006 21:50:09 From Local GET / HTTP/1.1..Host: fastream.homeip.net:82..User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6..Accept: text/xml,application/xml,appli

[twsocket] Interesting connect problem

Hi all, I have recently noticed a couple of interesting entries in one of my system logs from a Mail Relay Agent written using the TSMTPCli component, which raises a few interesting questions. Firstly here is a small extract from the system log > 19:26:28 - Connecting to mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com >

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Here is the problematic FF log: [...] A file version would be better, and of both browser. > The IE6 response has a different WWW-authenticate. If NTLM is like Digest, > then they should not be expected to be similar anyway (due t

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

News! Opera 9.01 available online from www.opera.com supports NTLM! :) Yet the bug also occurs on that software... :( Arno, can you try my exe with Opera? Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

To sum up: we have just one bug/problem left. It is the FF compatibility and with IE it works fine now. However, Arno claims the code runs well on his FF1.5.0.6 but the same browser fails here to authenticate. I thought maybe that's because of my Turkish locale but neither my username nor my pas

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Hello, Here is the problematic FF log: 13.09.2006 21:50:09 Connection Opened 13.09.2006 21:50:09 From Local GET / HTTP/1.1..Host: fastream.homeip.net:82..User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6..Accept: text/xml,application/xml,ap

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies schrieb: > > Arno, > > You have the option to enter the NTLM domain name in msg1 of NTLM (base64 > encoded). That's what I mean. I'm not Arno but again, in the browser a domain is only specified in the form domain\user in the user field of the browser's login window *if* the u

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > Second, I still cannot get the FF to work. I believe this is an issue at > least some customers would complain if I deploy now, wrong? But does IE work? In that case compare the log made with ethereal. Bye, Maurizio.

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: >> Arno, >> >> You have the option to enter the NTLM domain name in msg1 of NTLM >> (base64 encoded). That's what I mean. > Again: NTLM message 1 is sent by the the client/browser!! The job was clearly "Implement NTLM support to THttpSrv" and not "make my reverse pro

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Ok. I am trying to understand why the FF does not work... - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote:

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Arno, > > You have the option to enter the NTLM domain name in msg1 of NTLM > (base64 encoded). That's what I mean. Again: NTLM message 1 is sent by the the client/browser!! > > Second, I still cannot get the FF to work. I believe this is an issue > at least some

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think there is a misundestanding. Yes that's what the page says and I > mean: the "msg" contains the domain BUT in your code, the FF displays domain > > as "" (null). That needs to be fixed. At least "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" > should be di

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Arno, You have the option to enter the NTLM domain name in msg1 of NTLM (base64 encoded). That's what I mean. Second, I still cannot get the FF to work. I believe this is an issue at least some customers would complain if I deploy now, wrong? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Ok but let's say the server is running on multiple domains using a > domain > controller. Then I guess that the default authenticating authority will be the DC, someone needs to test that, anybody out there with a domain environment? > At simplest, a normal dom

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Thank you for the explanation Benjamin! I got it now. BTW, one note for others: Opera does not support NTLM. :( - Original Message - From: "Stadin, Benjamin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM quest

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Normally you won't have a reason to use another domain, the server appplication uses the domain of the user account it is running with. Make sure your application is running with the domain account you want to use AND sufficent privileges (needed to query the user database). You have to give a dom

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Ok but let's say the server is running on multiple domains using a domain controller. At simplest, a normal domain and the local domain. How does the client decides which one of them to log on to? And why don't you fill in the domain field in the NTLM msg 1? Regards, SZ - Original Message

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Ok, thank you for tolerating my insistence. I am trying to understand. > > There is just one issue left: under IE6XP, when I log in, I am not > asked of > any NTLM-domain name! Because there's no Domain information anywhere, The server just sends HTTP header "WWW-

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Ok, thank you for tolerating my insistence. I am trying to understand. There is just one issue left: under IE6XP, when I log in, I am not asked of any NTLM-domain name! And assuming that it is like IE-FTP client, I cannot find the log in change option in any menu! Does anybody know the logic be

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I mean the base64 message not the HTTP header. I'll give it up soon... THIS IS A CLIENT ISSUE!! The same happens when you try to access a protected page on IIS. > > > Again, > > I think there is a misunderstanding. Yes that's what the page says > and I > mean: t

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

I mean the base64 message not the HTTP header. Again, I think there is a misunderstanding. Yes that's what the page says and I mean: the "msg" contains the domain BUT in your code, the FF displays domain as "" (null). That needs to be fixed. At least "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" should be displaye

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > as "" (null). That needs to be fixed. At least "localhost" or > "127.0.0.1" > should be displayed there. Ask the FireFox developer to fix it. > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Wednesda

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I do not believe the empty domain implementation is correct!! What do you mean by that? A missing Domain HTTP header field? At least in my environment both IE as IIS do not sent any HTTP Domain header. AND M$ invented NTLM, it is undocumented. > Regards, > > SZ

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

I think there is a misundestanding. Yes that's what the page says and I mean: the "msg" contains the domain BUT in your code, the FF displays domain as "" (null). That needs to be fixed. At least "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" should be displayed there. - Original Message - From: "Arno Gar

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Hello, > > In this site: http://www.innovation.ch/personal/ronald/ntlm.html the > domain > names (both the HTTP and NTLM domains) are said to be transmitted in > the > base64 encoding msgs. Where have you read that? Give us a search string, not everybody is willi

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

IE makes some assumptions which is not the correct way to test against server software! - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Hello, In this site: http://www.innovation.ch/personal/ronald/ntlm.html the domain names (both the HTTP and NTLM domains) are said to be transmitted in the base64 encoding msgs. Could you check this out? I do not believe the empty domain implementation is correct!! Regards, SZ - Original

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Hello Arno and Francois, > > I cannot debug Arno's demo: It stops at breakpoints but does not let > me > inspect: AFAIK it's not possible to do that, and BTW I don't believe your problem has to do with the ICS server. IE works for you, right? You may try Netscape a

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Could anybody else also try it? We cannot be the only people using this http server component--this is for all users! Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [twso

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I created an admin user with the name "a" and no password still no > luck! :( My test user has just limited privileges (User), it also works fine when I run the server just as User with limited privileges. > > Regards, > > SZ > > - Original Message - >

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Hello Arno and Francois, I cannot debug Arno's demo: It stops at breakpoints but does not let me inspect: http://www.fastream.com/ics/arnoscreenshot2.png Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, Septemb

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

I created an admin user with the name "a" and no password still no luck! :( Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Ok. It is not related with port. One idea: my Windows username > includes a space. Could this matter? Why don't you create a new account w/o a space and try that out by yourself? I created one including a space as well as including German spezific characters above 1

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Ok. It is not related with port. One idea: my Windows username includes a space. Could this matter? Should there be made any encoding/decoding? Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Did you try a non-80 port? No I haven't, have you tried the standard port? > Maybe that requires a domain in the header? > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Here is what we are talking about with Arno for others: http://www.fastream.com/ics/OverbyteIcsWebServBCB.zip (includes exe, 412KB) Use the URL: http://localhost/demo.html Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing"

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Did you try a non-80 port? Maybe that requires a domain in the header? - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Techno

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Hello Arno and Everybody, > > Could you look at this screenshot carefully: > http://www.fastream.com/ics/arnoscreenshot.png. > > This is Arno's demo compiled with BCB2k6 and running on a Windows XP > Pro with no domain controller and just a work group. > It does not

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Hello Arno and Everybody, Could you look at this screenshot carefully: http://www.fastream.com/ics/arnoscreenshot.png. This is Arno's demo compiled with BCB2k6 and running on a Windows XP Pro with no domain controller and just a work group. It does not let me authenticate and there is no domai

[twsocket] Documenttation effort

Currently we have two new "writers" for http://wiki.overbyte.be : - Markus Humm - Ken Bradford They are actively enhancing the wiki. Big thank to them and all other writers. Anyone else willing to write into the wiki ? No need to know everything. There is work for all level of knowledge. J

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I also tested with FF/1.5.0.6! Something's wrong somewhere! BTW: In FF you may enter a user name like Host\User, though this is most likely not the problem here. > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing"

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

I also tested with FF/1.5.0.6! Something's wrong somewhere! - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrot

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Please check my private message. Your EXE works fine using Firefox/1.5.0.6! > > Rgrds, > > SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Also, in IE, as Francois said, it auto logs in to a domain. Where is the selection? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:50 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM q

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

- Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : > C and Pascal are close relatives and the code is not c

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Ok. Your demo worked fine with the SECURITY_WIN32 trick YET it still > does not work under Firefox. Please test it under Firefox as well! Works fine with Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6. However their are plenty of different versions available, probably some of them a

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > C and Pascal are close relatives and the code is not complex since > you know the Pascal-correspondent. I know you are a busy coder but > please give high priority for this. I really do not see where the C++ > conversion mistake is. It simply does not ask for NTLM-dom

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Ok. Your demo worked fine with the SECURITY_WIN32 trick YET it still does not work under Firefox. Please test it under Firefox as well! Best Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Arno, I just tried with your demo.html and it gives the same problem! Please refine your code under BCB personality (perhaps that's related?). It gives no compile time error--just does not let it authenticate! Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[twsocket] Fw: bytes lost with PUT FTP

Ok sorry sorry ! I’ve found my error. I’ve put a processmessage in « progress » event. Thanks. _ De : Arnold FLUTEAUX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 13 septembre 2006 11:22 À : 'twsocket@elists.org' Objet : Re: [twsocket] bytes lost with PUT FTP I’ve checked side ser

Re: [twsocket] bytes lost with PUT FTP

I’ve checked side server in StorDataAvailable event and I don’t receive all. So my problem comes side client but I don’t know where. I ‘m in Async mmode end binary mode (TYPE = I). Thanks for help _ De : Arnold FLUTEAUX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 13 septembre 2006

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

C and Pascal are close relatives and the code is not complex since you know the Pascal-correspondent. I know you are a busy coder but please give high priority for this. I really do not see where the C++ conversion mistake is. It simply does not ask for NTLM-domain information!! Regards, SZ -

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Please reply my private messages as well. This is plenty of C code, and I have to do my work as well! I'll take a look at it later. > > Thanks, > > SZ > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent:

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Please reply my private messages as well. Thanks, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:01 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: :

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:29 AM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) > > >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>> It does no

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

- Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question) : Fastream Technologies wrote: : > It does not ask for domain then! : : BTW: Not all bro

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > It does not ask for domain then! BTW: Not all browsers provide a domain field in their auth-dialog! There's a boolean var Allow, set it to FALSE in order to reject the user. > I thought this would look like a NT- > log on screen!! How does it understand which NT

[twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > It is a bit strange design for me, I would pass the domain as a var const > parameter. That's why I hesitated. Because the sole purpose of the event is > to pass the domain and wait for input. Sorry I cannot follow, the sole purpose of the event is to be able to ca

Re: [twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

It does not ask for domain then! I thought this would look like a NT-log on screen!! How does it understand which NTLM-domain to log in?? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:20 AM Su

[twsocket] Fw: Urgent (Another simple NTLM question)

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I have another problem: it never authenticates! Never lets in! I wrote, > > localhost\User (a windows user) > and my password but it does not work! Do not include host/domain in the username! --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.h

Re: [twsocket] bytes lost with PUT FTP

Hi, With the same file (it's a text file) of Kb, I receive always 8760 bytes in RAS connection only at 56 kb speed not in LAN. You talk about "message pump", what message pump; I don't understand. Sorry Arnold. Francois PIETTE francois.piette at overbyte.be

Re: [twsocket] Simple NTLM question

Fastream Technologies wrote: > I also did not understand why you made USE_NTLM_AUTH deifne! It is defined by default so why do you care? NTLM/SSPI requires a Windows OS, I like to be able to undefine features especially when they are still beta. > I do not > like defines much as they decrease th

Re: [twsocket] Simple NTLM question

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Where is the domain information in, > > AuthNtlmSession->OnBeforeValidate = AuthNtlmSessionBeforeValidate; Property AuthNtlmSession.Domain > > ? > > Regards, > > SZ > > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support m

Re: [twsocket] Simple NTLM question

Where is the domain information in, AuthNtlmSession->OnBeforeValidate = AuthNtlmSessionBeforeValidate; ? Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Simple NTLM q