On 18/09/13 17:34, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 04:08 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/09/13 17:00, bu...@nehbit.net wrote:
+1 for AMP.
Wow, lots of people using AMP. Maybe I'm missing out on something...
Don't people miss the symmetry of PB? Not to mention you can be lazy
and
On 12:38 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/09/13 17:34, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 04:08 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Don't people miss the symmetry of PB? Not to mention you can be lazy
and avoid defining a schema! Or are people using Twisted->Other AMP
connections?
AM
