On 12:38 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/09/13 17:34, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 04:08 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Don't people miss the symmetry of PB? Not to mention you can be lazy
and avoid defining a schema! Or are people using Twisted->Other AMP
connections?
AMP is symmetric in the same way PB is.
Exactly the same? I know you can callRemote on both sides, but only for
registered Command responders IIRC?
That's right (at least with the primary API exposed by the Twisted
implementation of AMP). This is analogous to how you can only call
`remote_*´ methods with PB - regardless of whether the calls are client
to server or server to client. For both protocols, these are API
decisions. The wire protocol for AMP says nothing about `Command´ or
"responders" just as the wire protocol for PB says nothing about a
`remote_´ method name prefix.
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
