Hello all,
I and my lovely assistant Glyph intend to cut a release of Twisted
10.1 on the 5th and 6th of June. That's in eleven days.
If you would like to help us do that, please fix one of:
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3998
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/4345
http://twistedma
On May 23, 2010, at 10:35 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 23 May, 12:26 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>> So: thoughts? Does this make sense as a policy change for facilitating
>> the development of major new features or consolidating behavior-
>> changing fixes into easier-to-un
On May 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
> FWIW, we've been doing this on Launchpad for some years and it works out well.
Good to know.
> As a rule, we don't have the final "sanity check" review, since we
> have robot minions that check for conflicts and that the tests pass.
This is
I've said something in #twisted but I hadn't read this reply yet, so for
sake of saving this for posterity, I agree with jml here. I think we're
mostly being bitten because of a lack of software tools, in the form of svn
and trac. Disclaimer: I really dislike svn since I never figured out how
Combi
It would already be a big step forward if the naming convention could
be addressed. Unfortunately the web vs. web2 thing really puts code
archeologists in a confusion if the incremental numbered module policy
is applied, because it appears that web2 > web but it is actually not.
code archeology cou
On 08:44 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
>On May 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>Also, +1 on the documentation.
>
>I think we should continue this discussion after somebody has done at
>least one branch like this.
Well, we did #886, right?
Jean-Paul
__
On May 26, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> Major stuff could be a blueprint on Launchpad. Blueprints match a branch for
> the "big feature". So, we have the Twisted blueprint
> quantum-transmogrification and a branch
> lp:~lvh/twisted/quantum-transmogrification.
So, while I can
On May 26, 2010, at 9:53 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 08:44 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>> Also, +1 on the documentation.
>>
>> I think we should continue this discussion after somebody has done at
>> least one branch
