On May 26, 2010, at 9:53 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > On 08:44 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: >> >> On May 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote: >>> Also, +1 on the documentation. >> >> I think we should continue this discussion after somebody has done at >> least one branch like this. > > Well, we did #886, right?
I don't think that counts. I meant that we've done at least one feature that *successfully* used a set of stacked branches. (I hope "stacked" means what I think it means here, and not some other crazy bzr thing.) #886 is more a description of the failure condition here than a success. #886 had one half-hearted sub-ticket, #3811, which eventually got abandoned and had to wait until #886 was merged to trunk anyway. And lots of other stuff that I wish had been added at the same time for a coherent unit of new functionality (like the high level API) was spun out into a separate ticket because it was too hard to review all at once. The high-level ticket in this case is really sneakily hiding out here: <http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedWebClient>. (A few things are still open there but I doubt that this is still a good candidate for development under the proposed style.) _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
