> That'd be great. The machines need to be online basically 100% of the
> time, and be able to make an outgoing TCP connection. Other than that,
> they'll stay idle except when someone commits to trunk or wants to try
> out a branch before merging. You can find more detailed instructions on
> th
On 24 Nov, 10:57 pm, eric.fau...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
>>Hi Eric,
>>
>>Thanks for participating in the release process! It's very
>> satisfying to actually get some feedback in response to a prerelease
>> ;).
>>
>>If OpenBSD were a supported
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for participating in the release process! It's very
> satisfying to actually get some feedback in response to a prerelease
> ;).
>
> If OpenBSD were a supported platform, a bug like this would cause
> the release pro
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to package it on OpenBSD, and there are quite a number of
> regression tests that don't pass there: failures, errors, busy loops,
> ... 10.0.0 was almost ok in this regard (I slacked on 10.1.0...)
> I'm looking into these issue
Hi,
I am trying to package it on OpenBSD, and there are quite a number of
regression tests that don't pass there: failures, errors, busy loops,
... 10.0.0 was almost ok in this regard (I slacked on 10.1.0...)
I'm looking into these issues, and I will create tickets for those.
Starting now: http:/
Despite a brief and unsuccessful attempt by Canadian forces to wrest control
of the Twisted release process, it continues. The francophone domination of
North America may be inevitable, but it won't happen today. Coming to you
from an ominous tower above Cambridge, Massachusetts, Twisted 10.2.0,
