On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Eric, > > Thanks for participating in the release process! It's very > satisfying to actually get some feedback in response to a prerelease > ;). > > If OpenBSD were a supported platform, a bug like this would cause > the release process to stop until it could be addressed; as it is, > we will try to merge a bugfix into the release branch if it is > available and reviewed in time (before next Monday). Being a > supported platform means that there's a buildbot, and that it shows > up on this page: > <http://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/boxes-supported>. Of course, if > OpenBSD were a supported platform, this bug never would have been > introduced in the first place, because we would have noticed failing > tests immediately! > > Does anyone feel like contributing an OpenBSD buildslave, and > hopefully also some more expertise for fixing bugs on that platform? > Or, for that matter, any other *BSDs? Sure. I have a couple of test machines for OpenBSD (amd64 and sparc64) that are mostly idling, and that could be used for that. I just need to know the procedure for setting up a buildbot, and I'll see what I can do. That would surely help me with the port maintainance. Eric. _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
