On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> Are you talking about building Docker containers on the fly?
>
>
> I’m a bit baffled what gave you that idea after I’ve spent days arguing
> for strict build/runtime separation?
>
I was just trying to figure out where you were having th
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Clayton Daley
> wrote:
>
> Are you talking about building Docker containers on the fly?
>
>
> Pretty sure Hynek has proper build-server/production separation.
>
Pretty sure
efficient to
upgrade because we only download the changed layers
This sounds like it covers a lot of the PEX advantages plus the added
benefits of containerization.
Clayton Daley
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> ... Contrary I’m not a super fan of having one opa
ar... especially if it emphasized the various architectural
layers by putting the protocol, command handler, and actual business logic
into separate classes.
Clayton Daley
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Daniel Sank wrote:
>
&
r old library with a 1.5yr old library.
Clayton Daley
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Clayton Daley wrote:
>
> I don't mean to jump down your throat here; the tone is definitely harsher
>> than I would like, but I want i
delayed feature depending on a feature in
a blocked version, it's an easy choice.
Clayton Daley
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Clayton Daley wrote:
>
> I don't object to this specific change (we're on shiny
27;t escalated]
>
So your question comes down to... is a point release in Twisted as risky as
a change to the cryptography stack? You'd certainly know better than I.
Clayton Daley
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
risk level of the system and
this could be a long and complicated process for some organizations. Seems
like a more deliberate deprecation policy would make it easier to plan
ahead.
Clayton Daley
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> In the past, we've been very
ou an
"approve" button (no 6-digit codes to transcribe).
Clayton Daley
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Adi Roiban wrote:
>
>
> On 1 July 2016 at 19:34, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For this pull request:
>>
>> https://github.com/twisted/t
tps://docs.python.org/2/library/sys.html#sys.exit)
Thus, your app never reaches any of the twisted code. If you're not
familiar with debugging tools that let you walk through the code, adding a
print line between each line of actual code would have made it obvious that
you never got past this line.
Clayt
has an issue (common for bug fixes, less common for new features), this
is less of a problem -- is this something the bot would need to verify/fix?
Clayton Daley
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Sank wrote:
> FWIW I thought of another "open source" community which uses a s
for myself, but was reminded that I don't know the
internals well enough... are patches on non-central protocols a big part of
the backlog? Or is the backlog mostly core features (like reactors or IO
infrastructure) that most projects depend upon?
Clayton Daley
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:22 PM,
heir* norms significantly increases the odds that they'll leave
the fix in a private fork and disengage.
Twisted operates at a different level so this may not be a bad thing. You
may benefit from actively discouraging dabblers -- especially given
resource constraints. But there aren't g
roblem, and we might reject one solution,
> but an issue should describe the problem itself.
While an Issue is a good place for discussion about a problem, it lacks the
reference code often included in a PR. You can't ask "how about this
approach" without showing the approach. As
at's not a
problem with SVN -- I wouldn't know.
Clayton Daley
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Clayton Daley
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Maybe this is old news, but I stumbled upon Subgit when poking around for
> a
+1
Maybe this is old news, but I stumbled upon Subgit when poking around for
another open source project. It says you can commit to both for as long as
you like and... it's free to use for open source:
http://www.subgit.com/pricing.html
Clayton Daley
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:40 PM
I (OP) was looking into these libraries/options as part of a side project
that's been delayed by real work. I'm also relegating Mongo to a caching
layer after stumbling upon Sarah Mei's "Why You Should Never Use MongoDB"
and realizing I was going to have the exact same
I'm not picky which CoC we use, but the fact that upstream requires
approval shouldn't disqualify PSF. Part of my argument is that our
contributions benefit a larger community. If PSF needs an enforcement
clause, they might be more than willing to adopt the change -- and a bigger
community would ce
Not that I'm a heavy contributor, but:
- A CoC is like a ToS in many ways. They rarely get read until there's
a problem.
- A CoC is like a License in many ways. They should be pretty standard
infrastructure.
I think both of these facts argue for joining Twisted to an existing CoC.
N
l if and when I contribute it (or the commons
establishes an official fork).
Clayton Daley
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:10 AM, bret curtis wrote:
> Hello fellow Twistrons,
>
> let me introduce TxMongo, an asynchronous MongoDB client that has come up
> a few times in discussion on this list. The
turning) wrapper... that would be enough for me.
- If a wrapper reduces the work to maintain the project at parity, I'd
redouble my support for the approach. No need to commit volunteer
supporters (current and/or future) to more work than absolutely necessary.
Clayton Daley
On Tue, D
I forgot to delete my tel from my sig in a reply. Is there anything I can
do to avoid leaving it published in the archives indefinitely?
Thanks,
Clayton Daley
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com
bject serialization is limited (likely to ensure
cross-platform compatibility), but the serializer is (purportedly)
pluggable.
Clayton Daley
clayton.da...@gmail.com
513.505.1236
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Sank wrote:
> This looks promising. Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:23
Thanks. Are you aware of any resources that clarify which pymongo calls
are lazy and which actually result in calls to the Mongo server (thus
really benefit from derferToThread)?
Clayton Daley
clayton.da...@gmail.com
513.505.1236
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Gelin Yan wrote:
>
>
&g
Are there any major disadvantages of using pymongo with callInThread
instead of txmongo? I'd like to take advantage of some newer features in
pymongo (unfortunately not available in txmongo) and it's certainly easier
to maintain feature parity using callInThread.
Cla
turn.
That way code written in the @inlineCallback syntax can be used by a
synchronous or asynchronous consumer.
Clayton Daley
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:14 PM, pierre at jaury.eu wrote:
>
Le 2014-04-25 01:45, Clayton Daley a écrit :
>* I imagine rewriting this to the followi
7;d also welcome any pointers from your (no doubt extensive) experience
writing the twisted version.
Thanks in advance!
Clayton Daley
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
27 matches
Mail list logo
