I'm not an SVN user (only Git) so I certainly don't care. I proposed it in the other group to help facilitate a transitional period. That would give users time to wrap up any work in SVN and transition to Git at their own pace... rather than on a specific drop dead date. Maybe that's not a problem with SVN -- I wouldn't know.
Clayton Daley On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Clayton Daley <clayton.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 > > Maybe this is old news, but I stumbled upon Subgit when poking around for > another open source project. It says you can commit to both for as long as > you like and... it's free to use for open source: > > http://www.subgit.com/pricing.html > > > > Thanks for the reference, but we would prefer to just eliminate our SVN > repository ;). For one thing it makes committing much slower to do all > this mirroring during commit. > > If there are people who actually *like* using SVN, when github is our > upstream, they actually have SVN client support (although there's no SVN > mirror on the back end): > https://github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support > > -glyph > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python > >
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
