>> I have to disagree here BTW. When I started using Twisted as a WSGI
>> container, I was vexed by its lack of docs (and I’m still confused about
>> many details). There’s a few blog posts around but none of them reach the
>> straight-forwardibility of e.g. gunicorn’s docs. I’ve ended up ask
> On Apr 17, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Thedore Oidelson wrote:
>
> I'm taking Glyph's suggestion and bringing this to the mailing list. :)
Thank you :). Hopefully some people more qualified than me will comment...
> I still believe it was unwise to remove the support for the extra EC curves
> in PR
> On Apr 17, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the initial release of kubetop, a command-line tool
> in the style of top(1) for displaying current usage and activity of a
> Kubernetes cluster.
Personally I'm not using Kubernetes much,
> On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
>
>> For the most part, general WSGI documentation should get you most of the way
>> there with specific frameworks though. This used to be a lot worse but in
>> recent years there's been a lot of convergence.
>
> I have to disagree h
Hi all, After reading the UDP Networking how-to I added interaction using UDP messages to my distributed application. One sub-application is UDP broadcaster and the other one is responder. Their minimized code is below: broadcaster.py:from datetime import datetimeimport socketimport traceback from
Hi,
I do think letting users configure the permissible curves (and their
priority) using a public tx API, and exposing all of the curves that the
underlying openssl provides is important.
FWIW, the german BSI (a state IT security institute that provides
recommendations, and certifications) n
Hello all,
I'm pleased to announce the initial release of kubetop, a command-line tool
in the style of top(1) for displaying current usage and activity of a
Kubernetes cluster.
kubetop 17.4.17.1 will format information about your Kubernetes cluster
like this:
kubetop - 13:02:57
Node 0 CPU% 9.8
I'm taking Glyph's suggestion and bringing this to the mailing list. :)
I still believe it was unwise to remove the support for the extra EC curves
in PR #749 for a few reasons that I've said in a few different places so
I'll summarize them here.
* Support for more curves is better. It gives mo
