Dnia 11-06-2011 o 17:51:03 Piotr Kamiński napisał(a):
Dnia 11-06-2011 o 17:30:50 Alan Gauld
napisał(a):
"Piotr Kamiński" wrote
This is a *technical* list, as I understand it, solely dedicated to
...
Since this seems to be something we can all agree on
can we con
Dnia 11-06-2011 o 17:30:50 Alan Gauld
napisał(a):
"Piotr Kamiński" wrote
This is a *technical* list, as I understand it, solely dedicated to
the
technical side of teaching the *Python* programming language and
*programming* in general. I would like to keep it this way ...
Hello,
I've been told that some of you, or everybody got my e-mail four times.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience. It seems there was a temporary failure of
my piotr-kam[at]o2.pl mail account. I tried to send the e-mail three
times, and each time got the "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" me
Dnia 11-06-2011 o 04:34:47 Steven D'Aprano
napisał(a):
Piotr Kamiński wrote:
Could you please refrain from presenting your *religious* convictions in
this list: the notions you believe in as well as the ones that you
believe
are false?
This is a *technical* list, as I understa
Dnia 10-06-2011 o 22:00:46 Corey Richardson napisał(a):
On 06/10/2011 03:12 PM, Piotr Kamiński wrote:
Could you please refrain from presenting your *religious* convictions
in this list: the notions you believe in as well as the ones that you
believe are false?
This is a *technical* list, as
Dnia 10-06-2011 o 12:25:34 Steven D'Aprano
napisał(a):
Vincent Balmori wrote:
I'm stuck on two problems from the Absolute Beginners book. The first
is simple. I am trying to print all the words in the list in random
order without repeats, but it always shows None for some reason.
#Program
Dnia 10-12-2010 o 20:14:30 Alex Hall napisał(a):
Hi all,
I was googling a way to do something like
mydict=mydict.extend(additionaldict)
and someone on a forum recommends this:
mydict=dict(mydict, **additionaldict)
What is the ** doing here?
As far as I know the ** indicates that the argumen
Dnia 25-11-2010 o 13:20:22 Mac Ryan napisał(a):
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:09:10 +0100
Timo wrote:
> I was wondering... apart from checking each name individually, is
> there any easy-peasy way to get a list of names used in the
> standard library (I am thinking to something like "dir()"?
Th
