On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 18:25:52 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
The security argument by itself is actually weak - if you start
doing sth. stupid as running a production binary from a user
writable path, you're screwed anyway - regardless of whether you
can read plugins from there as well:
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 17:45:02 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
First version of code is in my pali-gsoc branch.
Looks like you based your code on something from cmake's git. Could you
please make a separate commit that adds the original file (possibly under
the new name, not the original on
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 17:50:52 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
And PluginManager will use list QCoreApplication::libraryPaths()
for searching for plugins in subdir "/trojitaplugins" - like any
other qt plugins (style, etc.). This looks like common method for
using qt plugins.
You mentioned
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 17:23:53 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 September 2013 17:21:20 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 September 2013 17:15:41 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 11:52:35 CEST, Pali Rohár
>
> wrote:
> > > > And what about using *only*
> > > > QCoreA
On Wednesday 11 September 2013 17:54:40 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 17:50:52 CEST, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > And PluginManager will use list
> > QCoreApplication::libraryPaths() for searching for plugins
> > in subdir "/trojitaplugins" - like any other qt plugins
> > (style, e
On Wednesday 11 September 2013 16:26:47 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 10 August 2013 21:12:22 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > On Saturday, 10 August 2013 19:00:34 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > What about to have two options OFF and AUTO? And write
> > > status if feature will be compiled or not (depending
On Mittwoch, 11. September 2013 18:07:36 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
Now I looked into qt4 source code and default priority is:
1. QLibraryInfo::location(QLibraryInfo::PluginsPath)
2. QCoreApplication::applicationFilePath()
3. QT_PLUGIN_PATH
In addition, in Kontact the output of tha list will lik
On Saturday 10 August 2013 21:12:22 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 August 2013 19:00:34 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > What about to have two options OFF and AUTO? And write
> > status if feature will be compiled or not (depending on
> > find_package)?
>
> Kitware talks about something similar
