*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Hello Anthony,
On https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1692981 click
the text that says "Add attachment or patch" near the bottom left corner
of the page. On the next screen click "browse" and type in
/var/log/apt/term.log . Then click "post comment".
Thanks!
--
You received t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Hi Laurent, the issue is from this line:
invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of start.
Until the work from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893751
lands it doesn't make sense to run multiple auditds on one kernel.
Someone needs to do the work to see how much we're missing. So far
Thanks for the reminder to upgrade this old system. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677363
Title:
does auditd work on armhf on precise?
Status in audit p
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
Title:
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1u
Setting up php7.0-opcache (7.0.18-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) ...
Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66.
Use of uninitialized value $reply in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 67.
Use
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1699360 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699360
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1699360 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699360
Hello, note that whatever is on sdb is probably dying.
Thanks
** Also affects: debconf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1699108 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699108
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a
Public bug reported:
$ sudo /etc/init.d/auditd restart
* Restarting audit daemon auditd
Error sending add rule data request (Invalid
argument)
There was an error in line 17 of /etc/audit/audit.rules [ OK ]
T
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663453
Title:
NuTyX partition on same ssd bricked - used power button to sh
Christian, which architecture is this? ISTR some arch having troubles
with rlimit and I can't recall details now.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679
Public bug reported:
aa.py's get_reqs() function uses ldd(1) to find dynamically linked
requirements. We should probably use binutil's readelf or similar, or
stop using it entirely, as ldd(1) isn't the safest tool.
Thanks
** Affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** A
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Also affects: debconf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1681038 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681038
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bu
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Hello, I suggest trying
sudo apt-get install --reinstall libido3-0.1-0
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ido in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1684223
Title:
package libido3-0.1-0:i386 13.10.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Hello, your logs indicate some problems. It sure looks like your
/usr/sbin/adduser and /usr/sbin/addgroup programs have been modified and
that appears to be preventing other programs from running correctly.
Repairing this may be difficult depending upon when those programs were
corrupted and what m
Hello Carl, thanks for the report; can you please run apport-collect
1684902 to upload some logs that may help diagnose the issue?
Thanks
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Package changed: ubuntu => webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
There's a lot in this bug report:
- It appears a bluez snap is in use? that'll complicate the distro-provided
bluez
- It appears a bluez package is in use? that'll complicate the snap-provided
bluez
- It appears an i386 build of bluez is reporting errors, but the system
otherwise reports amd64
Thanks Carl; sadly the logs don't give me any better idea of what might
have happened. Can you reproduce the issue? It'd be helpful to see a log
of the messages involved.
The logs attached without trouble; feel free to unlink whenever. (I
don't think it really matters one way or another.)
Thanks
Hi Carl, ideally you can copy-and-paste output from a terminal or
similar window. After that it gets more complicated to upload e.g.
photos or videos.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Setting up makedev (2.3.1-93ubuntu2~ubuntu16.04.1) ...
/sbin/MAKEDEV: 215: /sbin/MAKEDEV: Cannot fork
/sbin/MAKEDEV: 220: /sbin/MAKEDEV: Cannot fork
/sbin/MAKEDEV: 626: /sbin/MAKEDEV: Cannot fork
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification be
Beautiful! Thanks Carl.
Apr 21 23:35:26 V2410US apparmor[260]: Skipping profile in
/etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
Apr 21 23:35:26 V2410US apparmor[260]: AppArmor parser error for
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.webbrowser-app in
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.webbrowser-app at line 26: Could not ope
I'm resetting these to Confirmed since it looks to me like Amir may have
accidentally set them to incorrect statuses.
Thanks
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You receive
I suggest trying:
apt-get update
apt-get purge kde-config-telepathy-accounts
apt-get install -f
apt-get -u upgrade
Thanks
** Project changed: sceps => ubuntu
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** Project changed: update-manager => ubuntu
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** No longer affects: wine (Ubu
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
This is a bug in the installer used by the guitar pro program. For some
reason they want to remove the sudo package during install. If it
actually uninstalled, you'd be left with a system that is very difficult
to recover.
Thanks
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
-
Rolly, please file a new bug against isc-dhcp and make sure to include
the AppArmor DENIED lines from your dmesg or auditd logs. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: jasper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jasper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Also affects: indicator-power (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-power in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100546
Title:
Power in
That's basically what upstream has, but without the symlink:
$ cat php5
#backwards compatibility include, actual abstraction moved from php5 to php
#include
The php abstraction in the master branch already includes these changes.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658239
Title:
base abstraction missing glibc /proc/$
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658238
Title:
apache2 abstraction incomplete
Status
Committed revision 3626.
Committed revision 3382.
Committed revision 3047.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658239
Title:
base abstraction missing
Committed revision 3625.
Committed revision 3381.
Committed revision 3046.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658238
Title:
apache2 abstraction incom
** Also affects: apparmor/2.9
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/master
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/2.10
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/2.11
Importance: Undecided
Status:
** Also affects: apparmor/master
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/2.9
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/2.10
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor/2.11
Importance: Undecided
Status:
** Changed in: apparmor/2.10
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/2.11
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/2.9
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/master
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notifica
** Changed in: apparmor/2.10
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/2.11
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/2.9
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor/master
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notifica
And while the current aa-notify behaviour sounds pretty terrible, it at
least accurately reflects what might be chewing your poor disk to
pieces. Logging all those denials isn't free either. :/
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512131
Title:
Apparmor complains about multiple /run
** Also affects: lxd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
http
Hadmut, AppArmor's stacking support was intended to allow supporting
unmodified Ubuntu inside LXD containers. If you're feeling up for some
experimentation, you could try to disable this feature by setting the
kernel.unprivileged_userns_apparmor_policy sysctl to 0 early in a system
boot, preferably
Public bug reported:
Hello;
The UTF-8 US English translation of stty has corrupted --help output:
$ LANG=C stty --help | grep -C10 Langasek
$ LANG=en_US.UTF8 stty --help | grep -C10 Langasek
-evenpsame as -parenb cs8
* [-]lcase same as xcase iuclc olcuc
litoutsame as
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to adduser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178616
Title:
Add override options when home directory already ex
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307086
Title:
Music app stops on standby/screenoff
Status in
Hello Samuel, thanks for doing this investigation. This feels like a
reasonable change to address through a Stable Release Update; the
process is a bit involved, but largely so we're sure we don't break
existing users in the process.
Are you in a position where you can prepare a debdiff? There's s
Hi Till, can you give this another look?
What is cups doing with smb here? Does it make more sense to give write
access to this entire directory as Stefan suggests or just to the
specific /var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb that was in the original report?
Thanks
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
St
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Preparing to unpack .../python-libxml2_2.9.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu4.9_amd64.deb ...
File "/usr/bin/pyclean", line 63
except (IOError, OSError), e:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: trying scri
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
I suspect this transition isn't finished yet:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/abiword -> "ubuntu changelog" -> 404
for url
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/a/abiword/abiword_2.9.2+svn20120213-1/changelog
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Oh yeah, it's more nuanced than I expected. Consider bash:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=bash
precise, precise-updates, trusty, and trusty-updates all 404. xenial,
xenial-updates, yakkety, and zesty all work fine.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Hi Graham, this is unlikely to be an AppArmor issue, the usual results
from AppArmor blocking access to a resource will be a Permission Denied
response rather than Input/Output error.
Just in case I'm wrong though, please paste in any DENIED messages from
AppArmor in your kernel's dmesg buffer.
T
Is dhcpd running in a chroot? Is the AppArmor profile using
'attach_disconnected'? (I'm guessing perhaps these aren't being created
in the real root; these two combined could give the appearance of
creating files in the root.)
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This may have been fixed in the interim; I cannot recreate the crash.
Even adding a ÿ char (generated via printf '\xff' in a line directly to
my /var/log/kern.log didn't trip this.
The python3 hookutils.attach_mac_events() attempt from comments #5 and
#6 also didn't recreate the crash.
Thanks
--
Creak, this bug has grown too large with too many "me too" complaints to
be useful. I suggest filing a new bug with ubuntu-bug network-manager
and describe what you see afresh.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
Lukas, if your DNS works but is slow that's probably two junk
nameservers listed in /etc/resolv.conf before one working nameserver. A
full debugging of your DNS is probably out of scope for a bug report; I
suggest heading to askubuntu.com or IRC.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676081
Title:
No wifi connection after s
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Hello,
Please consider demoting exiv2 to universe.
http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1248
The upstream author appears overwhelmed with the task of hardening exiv2
for use against untrusted inputs and thus far (~nine months) n
** Description changed:
Hello,
Please consider demoting exiv2 to universe.
http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1248
The upstream author appears overwhelmed with the task of hardening exiv2
for use against untrusted inputs and thus far (~nine months) no users
have provided the project
I certainly hope that shotwell's dependency can be disabled at build
time.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to exiv2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706471
Title:
please demote exiv2 to unive
I'm not saying it's not useful. The point is that the library that we're
using for Exif metadata is unsuited for use on a modern desktop operating
system or server connected to the Internet.
The maintainer doesn't want to put in the work to take it from a fun
hobby to a production-grade tool. I ca
Good idea Jeremy; https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785547
(heh, launchpad called it 'exiv2' when I linked them together. Oh well.)
Thanks
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #785547
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785547
** Also affects: exiv2 via
https://bugzilla.gn
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707247
Title:
package unattended-upgrades 0.90ubunt
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707108
Title:
package fontconfig 2.11.94-0ubuntu1.1 failed t
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707334
Title:
Falied to start LBS - AppArmor ("inicialização")
St
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707502
Title:
package sudo 1.8.16-0ubuntu1.5 failed to install/upg
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707632
Title:
Connecting HDMI freezes everythin
Status in xorg pa
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707649
Title:
[HDA-Intel - HDA Intel PCH, playback] volume
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Please file a new bug with "ubuntu-bug apt" for the hash sum mismatches.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708179
Title:
Has Sum incorreto e diversos er
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708331
Title:
pacotes quebrados
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
701 - 800 of 1563 matches
Mail list logo
