** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification b
We still need more details
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888347
Title:
blk-availability unmounts filesystems before applications have
finished using them
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093081
Title:
Installing many packages
It's entirely possible it can be dropped back to perl-base, it's a
question of whether ucf needs things from perl-modules.
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: ucf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
It's confusing but the first message shows you how many packages have a
newer candidate version and can be upgraded for no other reason which
maps directly to upgradable both --upgradable and ?upgradable, and
changing that to exclude phased updates would be a strange ABI break.
Note that people do
So multiple things here to consider:
1. It seems we do not localize initrds and hence also not password prompts for
FDE
2. Offline updates are not used by Ubuntu and I thought not by Kubuntu either
as that uses QApt? That particular case is hence not of significant concern
** Summary changed:
To further explain, I made a demo video with additional explanation:
https://youtu.be/UoD39nJiQCA
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092635
Title:
apt show loops
Note that you can always disable automatic pager use in apt and git by
exporting PAGER=cat if you are comfortable using a scroll bar in the
terminal window and don't want the features a pager gives you like
searching.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Your screenshots all look correct, and 'apt policy gnome*' or other
commands work fine, they print into less, and wait form me to navigate
using arrow keys and quit using the q key. Thats a cool new feature
people have been asking for for years, as they've grown accustomed to it
from git.
Again I'
If the output does not fit into the window the pager will page it, and
you will navigate inside the pager. If you do anything other than scroll
down and then quit (using q or whatever mechanism), the scrollbar of the
terminal window will have limited use, as it will show a crude view of
the actions
It does sound to me like you moved around in the pager, including using
the End key to jump to the end, invoking skipping, then jumped back up,
involving a reprint of those lines, then exited the pager, and have now
scrolled back using the terminal feature which indeed is going to show
repeated out
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092635
Title:
apt show loops displaying same text multiple times
APT now supports the use of a pager, but the output hasn't changed aside
from some new fields being added.
To exclude a misconfiguration please check what PAGER is set to, and
what /usr/bin/pager points to. You may want to check if git show or
another git command works for you and if you override
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091659
Title:
pam-auth-update silently fails if a config file has CRLF line endings
Status in
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091659
Title:
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059819
Title:
Regression:
Merge proposal listed for the required seed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063101
Title:
Update apt override from important to required
Status in apt package
Public bug reported:
The noble update picked up those dependencies on armhf due to t64
mangling changes in the C++ symbols, and is now uninstallable.
** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecid
** Changed in: nspr (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nspr in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084460
Title:
[SRU] Please enable frame-pointer on Nobl
Going to remove the incoming tag as there does not seem to be any action
needed here from our side.
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
This needs a clear explanation how to reproduce and what the issue is,
the Debian bug referenced is about a wrong path to /usr/bin/sort and
seemingly entirely different.
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
This is tagged todo, but this needs a lot of planning
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch see
I'm confused here, because there's a fix released gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator task, so why do we have a gnome-shell task as well, and how
do their test cases differ, surely if the extension is fixed, the test
plan doesn't apply to gnome-shell anymore?
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Nob
Thank you for your bug report. This looks more like a user support
question on how to configure APT sources, my recommendation would be to
use one of the support venues: https://ubuntu.com/community/support
In particular, it seems you have an incorrectly formatted URL in your
sources.list or file
This is an abbreviation like creat(2) that seems utterly pointless in
retrospect but it is what it is
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
ht
I've not seen issues since removing ibus, so it really must be the whole
ibus communication that causes the repeat code to go wrong, but further
investigation is warranted where it goes wrong. I should record a dump
with libinput and then replay it to reliable reproduce the issue
because surely th
** Also affects: ibus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079819
Title:
Keypresses are repeated as if key is
Fixed in 2.9.1 which should sync later.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089543
Tit
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
aptsources.sourceslist represents the sources of the system. Those are ordered
by filename, but we do not sort the listdir() output, giving an unexpected
presentation to the user.
This matters in some places as order determines the source we fetch from
in cases the
Still an issue is software-properties depends on it to show you the keys
so it needs to stay around a bit but it's not actually used to edit
keys.
I need to finish the other merge that adds a key listing helper, and
then rewrite software-properties so it shows you the keys per-file and
allows you
Fixed https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/406
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200
Removal of apt-key is tracked in bug 2004505
I wrote a new sopv backend for apt yesterday as a PoC that doesn't rely
on apt-key to merge together keyring files to run gpgv, but instead runs
sopv once for each keyring the repository is configured to trust.
The classic gpgv backend I believe can wo
** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubu
With -s you don't even need sudo, but you missed the Dir::Log::Solver=
part
> apt-get autoremove -s -o
Dir::Log::Solver=/home/paul/Documents/Ubuntu20.04/BugReport.edsp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ub
Well yes, we don't keep track of per-directory levels of Installed-Size,
Installed-Size means /usr (or /boot for linux-image).
So we can extend this to
Installed-Size-Boot
Installed-Size-Var
Installed-Size-Opt
(and/or Extra-Size-*)
which I guess would solve all the big use cases.
We can't have
Thanks for your bug report, this doesn't seem good - Is your system in a
consistent state? what does `apt-get check` say?
If it is, please rerun the command with `-o
Dir::Log::Solver=/some/path/to/a/file.edsp` with an appropriate path of
your choosing and then attach the generated file to the bug
I think this ties in to similar issue with the boot size we have in
Debian; maybe we should have
Extra-Size
as a field in the snap2deb. But certainly we don't want to query snapd
from inside APT; snapd would need to query the store and at this point
of the process users expect an immediate respon
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
triage: Need to put the updating sources into a separate thread and spin
up a spinner such as not to block the main thread.
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087827
I think ~ubuntu-sponsors was subscribed by accident and am unsubscribing
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083538
Title:
amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:
Public bug reported:
Line buffers are 1000 bytes and can be truncated; the cache database
keys are truncated to 600 bytes, potentially causing growing databases.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: python3.8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: python3.12 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
APT is switching away from a global gpg keyring to configuring a key
file per repository using the Signed-by option. These keys should
preferably be places inside the sources file itself (embedded) or the
option should reference a file, the canonical directories of which are
/usr/share/keyrings or
This is a bit of a wrong recipient for your complaint - apt does not
manage snap packages, the deb2snap packages implement that in their
maintainer scripts - but let me say that this behaviour is in line with
the behaviour expected for transitional packages.
For deb2deb transitional packages, apt
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Title:
mkinitramfs fails with copy_file bin
We'd like to mark this a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/2083131 but it's not
clear what happens to the bug proxy then, let us know if that's
agreeable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
Tagging foundations for sponsoring
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
Title:
Bash's builtin command "printf" has a grave
Reassigning to bash for the builtin, if coreutils is *also* broken
please let us know
** Package changed: coreutils (Ubuntu) => bash (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
triage: remove pam_lastlog.so from configuration following the debian
change
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085314
Title:
systemd-netowrk segfault (question #819069)
Forwarded as C167230 to IS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085142
Title:
/project/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg is outdated
Status in ubuntu-keyring p
This is how it looks here which isn't exactly optimal but also no
significant issue.
I'd rather focus on redesigning this properly - the whole user interface
still looks like 20 years ago.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot From 2024-11-07 16-23-30.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
Basically what I can see and what I guess you mean is that, after you
have submitted your password, software-properties becomes unresponsive
for a couple of seconds as it is deleting the entry. As that is what I
can reproduce.
It is *very* slow and the task runs on the main thread, so the GUI
rend
Oh I'm well aware and have discussed this a couple of times.
We have since switched to deb822 sources, and the regression potential
for adding support for legacy source options is quite high.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086753
Title:
apt shows updates for oracular as standard LT
-t selects a target release, equivalent to
Package: *
Pin: release
Pin: 990
The pkg/ver syntax meanwhile overrides the candidate for a chosen package.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch see
** Description changed:
- (This is uploaded to noble as 2.8.1 per
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
+ (Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates for the versioning)
[Impact]
- We have received feedback from users that use NIST-P256 keys for their
repositories that are upset about rec
** Summary changed:
- APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors
+ APT 2.8.4+: Promote weak key warnings to errors
** Description changed:
+ (2.8.3 update references this bug as previous uploads tried to fix it
+ and have not been fully reverted, per discussion with rbasak we agreed
+ to jus
I enabled that debug option thingy. I'll try to have a go at a mainline
kernel build at some point.
Now the problem is I can't reproduce this so far. gnome-shell/xwayland
randomly exits at some point without any explanation (you can see it
just starts broken pipe at 12:31:54, no crash before, I ne
Attaching the Journal, the initial crash can be seen at 12:31:54, lots
going on there, but nothing root-causing this.
** Attachment added: "Journal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2085340/+attachment/5830742/+files/Journal.txt
--
You received this bug notification b
Public bug reported:
This is a very weird case: The GNOME session crashed 3 times today, the
last time, it went to gdm, but then gdm did not recognize it was docked
and suspended. I think the kernel needed two attempts to resume, it got
suspended again after the first one; and it produced a whole
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860500
Title:
consider disabling apt-secure's Label check in
Unsubscribed the SRU people I added to give them visibility while it was
private, and updated the description with more impact details.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- apt-ftparchive used a custom tree data structure and statically sized
buffers, causing
+ apt-ftparchive used a custom tree
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu
The cat is out of the bag. This is fixed in 2.9.9 and will be handled
via regular stable release updates.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ap
With 0.99.48:
1. Turn on source code, save and refresh sources, close app
2. Start again, observe the flag is on.
^ works so far
3. Turn "recommended updates" to "all updates", observe that -backports got
added with deb-src, to the existing paragraph.
^ here backports got added with deb only
4. R
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
During testing bug 2069433 in a lxd vm, enabling backports added a new
paragraph to ubuntu.sources, when it should have merged it with the first one.
This is a visual annoyance.
** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Ne
Happy to sponsor. We need to fill out the SRU template, and need to add
some test plan there as per:
https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/howto/standard/
https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/reference/bug-template/#reference-sru-bug-template
--
You r
One thing I wonder, the crash is one thing; but the inability of the
kernel/firmware to recover from that is another. As in, new mesa fixing
that particular crash is ok, but optimally you'd also be able to recover
from the crash with the old mesa; but the GPU restarts are failing and
the driver app
The fontconfig issue sounds like fontconfig-config is missing a
Breaks&Replaces against ubuntustudio-default-settings (< 24.04) or
something
** Also affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083538
Title:
amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id
FWIW, the message in the "terse" UI in 2.9.x is
"Not upgrading yet due to phasing:"
It's a particular challenge to get it into terse UI, as we need to start
with a verb in progressive form (well here it's negated), stating the
action we will (not) take.
Though arguably it has a second form. If w
@jwms It's particularly difficult to get the message correctly, the
feature is known as "phased updates", hence it's worded such that you
can search "Ubuntu phasing" and get decent results. If we set "staged
rollout", you could not find results for it. A "phased rollout" might
work.
If we literall
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083568
Title:
full system freezes and needs to be hard r
To the best of my knowledge the issue started happening when the kernel
was upgraded. That being said, the Firefox process that seemingly causes
stalls is a snap so it is using its own mesa and not the host one, and I
can't speak to the snap's mesa version.
--
You received this bug notification b
I forgot to verify it when I was in the vicinity of my noble system and
other stuff took the priority over setting up a new desktop VM so far.
But I can try tomorrow, unless you have a noble machine around where you
can just follow the steps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083068
Title:
Broken libglib2.0-dev:i386 Depends on python3:i386 < none |
3.12.3-0ubuntu2
For oracular is the solution architecture-properties?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083068
Title:
Broken libglib2.0-dev:i386 Depends on python3:i386 < no
Tracking
Broken libglib2.0-dev:i386 Depends on python3:i386 < none |
3.12.3-0ubuntu2 @un uH >
here. Which happens due to
Depends: python3 | qemu-user | qemu-user-static
in libglib2.0-dev:i386 (thanks helmut).
i.e. it says python3 needs to be the same architecture, or you need
qemu-user to exec
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
While we're debating workarounds, to note:
This issue affects unattended-upgrades only once, in a non-default
configuration and does not break the ability to install upgrades. After
the upgrade ran, the next upgrade will work correctly (as it will have
imported the new email.errors due to restarti
One proposed work around in Python is to change the email.generator
module import:
from email.errors import HeaderWriteError
to graciously support the previous version email.errors:
try:
from email.errors import HeaderWriteError
except ImportError:
from email.errors import MessageError a
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080940
Title:
unattended-upgrades b
** Also affects: python3.12 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080940
Title:
unattended-upgra
The problem here is funny:
`Message.as_string()` imports `email.generator` when called.
Now, `email.generator` has been updated to the security update that
depends on the new class `HeaderWriteError`.
But we already had imported `email.errors` earlier, in either of the
`email.charset` or `email.
You can also use /usr/lib/apt/apt-helper drop-privs to run
as _apt user for enhanced debugging.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079785
Title:
apt / apt-get i
APT first drops all groups and then changes the effective user and group
id to the one for _apt, before attempting to
mkstemp("/var/cache/apt/archives/partial/.apt-acquire-privs-
test.XX")
to create a file. There must be some permission issue in some part of that
tree, check your /, /var, /
Tagging this for the apt/noble and apt/oracular uploads.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Chan
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216
Title:
sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces
Status
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080499
Title:
/usr/share/apport/apport:ProcessLookupError:
@aaronmfeld If you have an upgrade issue, please file a separate issue,
this particular one has been verified as fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078720
Ti
How does it calculate that? The package is Priority: required for the
source in debian/control, which extends to Package: apt and accidentally
I suppose to Package: apt-utils as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
Upgrading with ubuntu-release-upgrader from proposed also worked
correctly:
$ lxc list -c nft
+--+--+-+
| NAME | BASE IMAGE | TYPE |
+--+--+-+
| jammy-to-noble-p
Verifying the apt/jammy SRU:
I installed libapt-pkg6.0=2.4.13 from proposed, then run `do-release-
upgrade -p` (`-d` should work now too, but was broken before):
The headers for the running kernel are not being removed:
Remove (was auto installed) binutils binutils-common
binutils-x86-64-linu
@sil2100 The regression in time is back to the old behavior prior to
24.04.20; actually it's a bit faster as there is just a single action
group now. But the reason for it was that we iterated over all packages
in the cache and recorded their selected state in case we needed to undo
a change (verif
** Description changed:
(For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04 vi
This is the expected behavior, it will pick the highest version (well
highest priority version) from any allowed repository. You have not
disallowed installing the Ubuntu one, and you also did not allow it to
install the Mozilla one.
You have two options
1) Pin the Ubuntu version down instead:
I
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079810
Title:
unattended-upgrades d
** Description changed:
+ (For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
+
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
-
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04
1 - 100 of 1082 matches
Mail list logo
