On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:00:16PM +, nusenu wrote:
> All 4 relays with that kind of advbw disappeared from consensus on
> 2016-01-31 18:00:00.
>
> If you have some insights on whether dirauths removed them or not, feel
> free to let us know.
The directory authorities didn't do anything; I no
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:18:37PM +0800, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> If I used the same node in ExcludeExitNodes and ExitNodes, Tor will
> use this node as the exit node or not? In other words, which has a
> higher priority within Tor?
ExcludeExitNodes is supposed to take priority over ExitNodes.
See
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:26:51PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
> > > It is just the nicer way to say goodbye to clients - I guess.
>
> Also, tor then has a chance to gracefully shut down circuits so
> that at least short-lived connections don't break by the shutdown.
Yes, this is it. Once you star
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:50:58PM +, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote:
> On 2016-02-16 15:04, TWN wrote:
> >Correction: the Network Team Meeting is Feb 17 13:30 UTC.
>
> How to access meeting?
These meetings are on irc. In the original mail, you can see that it
says "#tor-dev, irc.oftc.net". So t
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:36:53AM +0100, Flipchan wrote:
> Does anyone have or know where i can find a list with bad exits/relays
There aren't great resources for this I think.
The simple answer is that you can look at your cached consensus file,
and the ones labelled BadExit are the bad exits,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:45:26AM -0500, Scfith Rise up wrote:
> Here is the exact link:
> https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-dir-onions-seen.html
>
> it jumped from 4 to 6 in the past day or two.
>
> Since the metrics are based on the number of relays acting as hidden
>services w
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:28:37AM -0600, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote:
> With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to
> view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a
> list of hidden services during the suspected time frame?
No, there is no easy way to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 03:46 PM, Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> > My conclusions are that running Tor on the router can enhance both
> > security and usability. It further opens new possibilities for expanding
> > the Tor-network and
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:01:54PM -0500, Scfith Rise up wrote:
> Now the spike is up to over 8 domains. The Tor Project has had more
>than a few days now to analyze this,
This is true, but we don't know anything more than we did, and until
something changes we will continue to not know. My an
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 05:24:34PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> Right, _very_ difficult to find!
>
> But, let's say that one were found. Or occurred by chance. Am I correct
> that HSdirs would go with the server that had announced most recently?
Yes.
http://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/13/can-a-hi
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:11:26PM +, Bernard Tyers wrote:
> HI Andrea,
>
> Is it possible to share the learnings and output from this research?
>
> I am a usability of privacy tools researcher and designer and would be very.
You can see some of the results in this 32c3 video:
https://media.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:07:44AM +0100, Ben Stover wrote:
> Assume I specified in "torrc" file
>
> ExitNodes {fr},{de],{ca}
>
> According to Tor docs that means that the exit nodes should always (?) be in
> one of the three countries.
>
> On the other hand there is another parameter "StrictEx
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:39:20PM -0800, Green Dream wrote:
> By default (i.e., StrictNodes is false) Tor will bypass your declared
> ExitNodes if it needs to do so in order for traffic to reach its
> destination. Imagine the scenario where all the exit nodes in your
> ExitNodes criteria have stri
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:04:28PM +, Oskar Wendel wrote:
> Is there any chance for tor-onions mailing list to be available through
> Gmane? I read Tor lists with Gmane, as it's way more convenient to use
> a newsreader than to read lists with email, but the list is still not
> there...
Thi
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:02:53AM +0100, coderman wrote:
> On 3/19/16, Oskar Wendel wrote:
> >...
> > Let's set up a service in a way that it will modulate the traffic, so the
> > download would look like:
> > [ some distinct signaling here...]
>
> yes; it's a traffic confirmation attack, and by
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:59:21PM +0100, Ben Stover wrote:
> When I start TorBrowser the current "torrc" file is read.
>
> Now assume I change the instructions in "torrc".
>
> Do I have to exit and restart TorBrowser to get the new "torrc" instructions
> working?
On Windows, yes.
On other ope
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:26:17AM +, jb wrote:
> sometimes when I start the browser and execute "Test Tor Network Settings"
> on Welcome Page, I get an IP address that differs from that of exit node (as
> displayed thru Torbutton).
> Why does it happen, and is it something to worry about or a
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:02:44AM +, Oskar Wendel wrote:
> Let's assume that the service is extremely popular, with over 6 terabytes
> of traffic each day, and a gigabit port almost constantly saturated.
This assumed scenario seems extremely unlikely to be happening in
practice. First becaus
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Adam M. Dobrin wrote:
> Subject: INFO4U Religion provides statistical proof of the Creation of our
Sorry for the disturbance everyone. Yes indeed, this thread is
off-topic. I've removed the original poster from the list.
--Roger
--
tor-talk mailing list
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:04:44AM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
> Somewhere is a piece of advice from TorProject recommending people not
> to run an exit node from home for the above and other reasons.
Actually it's EFF's Tor legal faq:
https://www.torproject.org/eff/tor-legal-faq
("Should I run a
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:34:45AM +0200, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote:
> i have no link to the equipment and software or installation guide which is
> needed to provide a Tor ExitNode. the bags at the #wewillrebuild pic aren't
> good enough even for a presentation. i searched the wiki which is full o
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:39:33AM -0700, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> 1. "Tor does provide a partial solution in a very specific situation,
> though. When you make a connection to a destination that also runs a
> Tor relay, Tor will automatically extend your circuit so you exit from
> that circuit. So fo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:09AM +1000, Peter Tonoli wrote:
> This is a real success story for Tor
I agree!
Thank you Alec and other security people at Facebook for seeing the
value in secure communications, and also for being willing to stand up
and talk about numbers.
For those who are now t
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:27:17PM +, lukep wrote:
> I'd prefer the FAQ entry to be updated rather than removed. It gives me a
> little confidence in the site
Hi lukep,
Nothing will happen with the FAQ unless somebody updates it. I put
some instructions in my previous mail:
"""
The second be
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:00:36AM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just had the TBB ask me something to the lines
> of 'refresh tor browser?', and I sleepily said
> yes, and now the browser apparently has lost
> the addon that is the tor process underneath,
> and just says 'the proxy se
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:47:08AM +, eliaz wrote:
> I'm currently running a bridge via torbrowser (I know, it's not
> recommended. Indulge me). When I checked torbrowser tonight, trying to
> open check.torproject.org I got me an error "Sorry. You are not using
> Tor" and an apparent IPv6 addr
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:34:52PM +, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> Is there a link to the source code for _Tor_ on http://www.torproject.org/
> home
> page?
Go to https://www.torproject.org/download/download and click on 'source
code'.
> Also-- it'd be nice if there were a clear link to a git r
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:40:17PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> Justin helped me by running some tests and we think we know how this
> Cyberoam device is blocking meek connections. It blocks TLS connections
> that have the Firefox 38's TLS signature and that have an SNI field that
> is one of our
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:13:54PM +0200, Brieuc Barthélemy wrote:
> In point 4 (Page 4) the article talks about differents keys:
> - A long term identity key: to sign TLS certificate, OR route descriptor
> and to sign directories.
> - A short-term onion key: used to decrypt requests from users.
>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:05:22AM +0200, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists
wrote:
> the cool ntop project (www.ntop.org) has released it's opensource DPI
> (Deep Packet Inspection) engine with enhanced Tor protocol dissector and
> support http://www.ntop.org/ndpi/released-ndpi-1-8/ .
>
> They do
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:52:17PM -0500, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> > http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf
>
> So basically you're saying that Tor is actually pretty darn secure if
> you don't use it every single time you connect to the Internet or for
> extended periods of
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:13:23AM +0200, Flipchan wrote:
> Hi im writing a whitepaper atm , and im working on a proxy/code for that
> whitepaper and it would help/be good to look at the source code for the
> CensorSpoofer if anyone got it,i cant seem to find it anywhere
>
> https://people.cs.u
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:57:00PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> scenario A)
>
> Let's assume someone's Tor client picked an entry guard on IP
> AAA.BBB.CCC.EEE. And then [without knowing and/or by chance] tried to
> make a torified connection to [1] IP AAA.BBB.CCC.EEE.
>
> - Would Tor use th
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:18:38AM -0400, Ethan White wrote:
> Also, unfortunately, I'm going to be away from all things internet
> for the next week or so, and thus unable to answer many
> questions. Sorry for essentially commiting and leaving.
Neat! Hopefully that away-from-the-net part means yo
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:49:04PM -0400, myz...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> I feel like Tor has become increasingly user-friendly
> and the Tor Browser Bundle is by far less 'intimidating' to perform
> first time configuration than it was a few years ago.
Yay! Sign me up. There are many millions of
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:05:07AM +0100, land...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I'd like to ask why is tor-win32-0.2.8.5-rc.zip and
> torbrowser-install-6.5a2_en-US.exe connecting to 18.0.0.1 ?
>[...]
> is tor 0.2.8.5-rc binding a socket to 18.0.0.1 ? or is it something else? if
> so why is this not on
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:58:55AM -0700, George Grantham wrote:
> I've heard that Tor Bridges and Tor exits are both within serious demand.
>
> At this point in time within the Tor Network, are Tor Bridges with obfs4
> pluggable transports at a greater need, or are Tor exit nodes?
I think exit r
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Tor Dev wrote:
> I see now. My apologies! I pressed the button indeed multiple times, but the
> window with the mail didn???t close after pressing the button. Even disabling
> GPG signatures made no difference. After a few minutes I force quitted my
> ma
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:34:45PM -0400, Random User wrote:
> What is your basis for saying that HS .onion sites are "likely harder to
> attack" than "public HTTPS" sites?
Well, one feature is that the onion service design limits the surface area
to only that service. So you can't break in by e.g
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:27:52PM -0400, Random User wrote:
> I'm just wondering what accounts for TB 6.0.5 being released at least
> several days ahead of the date announced (20 Sept.)
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-browser-605-released
has your answer (and is also the page that Tor Browse
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:51:50PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> It would *greatly* help readers if the full raw maildir
> or mbox archives could be provided for download.
> Thus seeding their MUA's and search tools and indexes.
Here's a tarball I just made from the seul.org archives:
http://seul.org/~
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:21:10AM -0400, 128Ko wrote:
> Some month ago, i have installed tor on Ubuntu Wily with the methode
> described here :
> https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en
It looks like your Ubuntu version is end-of-life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_version_history#
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 03:10:06PM +0200, tort...@arcor.de wrote:
> Second, some readers argued that a Tor user loses a reasonable expectation of
> privacy in IP addresses because the user must disclose his true IP address to
> Tor.
I think this reasoning represents a deep misunderstanding of ho
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 06:39:03PM +0200, tort...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> Thanks, Flipchan! Nope, as far as I can see, I am not running
> anything else on that port...
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/212d2xc/9
>
> Still "could not connect to Tor control port"...
>
> Any idea?
It is possible you are hitt
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:54:35PM +0100, John Doe wrote:
> Maybe it is also a false positive. Have to check this.
Right -- my assumption whenever I hear of strange antivirus behavior
is that the antivirus program is mis-tuned. After all, one of their
main techniques is to look in every file and s
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:57:15AM +0100, arrase wrote:
> Is there an app like TorChat for Android? The idea of ??TorChat is
> interesting but the current implementation is very basic for normal use
Careful! You should be aware that "TorChat" is not made or endorsed
or anything by the Tor peop
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:05:06PM +0100, arrase wrote:
> Orbot control port is randomized every run, is there a way to know the port
> by other app? I would like to write an app who manages his own hidden
> service.
Check out the ControlPortWriteToFile torrc option. You can instruct
Tor to write
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:44:15PM +0100, Flipchan wrote:
> I dont think so, quantum 4times at fast so we just need to generate 4times as
> strong keys the entropy will just be bigger, But as Long as we are not useing
> like 56 bit des keys its okey
No, it's way more complicated than this.
The
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:55:23PM -, firstwa...@sigaint.org wrote:
> This is an Javascript exploit
Thanks. I pointed some folks on irc to this mail, and Daniel Veditz
(Mozilla Security Team) said "the Firefox team was sent a copy of that
this morning. We've found the bug being used and are wo
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:08:00PM +, Georg Koppen wrote:
> FWIW: We plan to release 6.0.7 with the patch Mozilla developed in a
> couple of hours. Updates to the alpha and hardened series will we
> provided as well thereafter.
Update:
* The blog post about the 6.0.7 Tor Browser update will g
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:28:52PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> * The blog post about the 6.0.7 Tor Browser update will go up any
> moment. I see that the Tor Browser team has already put the packages in
> https://dist.torproject.org/torbrowser/6.0.7/
And there it
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:06:30PM -0500, scfith riseup wrote:
> First, not sure why you want to list .onion domains. The key here is that
> they are HIDDEN services. But I am sure you have reasons.
Actually, that's part of the reason for the shift into calling them
"onion services" -- many peopl
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:33:16AM +, Jedd Casella wrote:
> unsubscribe
>[...]
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
These instructions are at the bottom of every
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:59:37PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> > "Try to shut down .onion 'domains' over Tor," he boasted, knowing that
> > nobody can.
>
> OK. However, it's not hard to scan for connections to Tor servers. And
> you don't expect them for random devices. But maybe Mirai is setup to
> u
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0100, fatal wrote:
> And will there be a tor relay operators meetup?
Julius reserved a workshop room for us on day 2, from 21:30 to 23:00,
in Hall B:
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2016/wiki/Session:Tor
So you should feel free to come by and we'll talk about w
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 08:35:55PM +0100, x333 x333 wrote:
> > Julius reserved a workshop room for us on day 2, from 21:30 to 23:00,
> > in Hall B:
> >
> > https://events.ccc.de/congress/2016/wiki/Session:Tor
>
> Why did you choose to make it at the same time as phw's censorship talk takes
> plac
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:25:20PM +1030, windows95@national.shitposting.agency
wrote:
> I'm tasked with doing a short report on the ways in which Tor can be
> attacked.
> I've brainstormed and done research for few hours and this is the
> list I've come up with.
> Is there anything big that I've
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:58:53PM -0300, ilv wrote:
> We also trust other providers like
> Google and Dropbox, so I don't see why we couldn't trust archive.org.
Sounds like a great addition!
I wouldn't want to use that logic to add *any* website, but I think we
like archive.org at least as much
(Also, Tor 0.2.9.9 is out. If you didn't know, you should subscribe to
the tor-announce list and/or read the Tor blog!)
Tor 0.3.0.2-alpha fixes a denial-of-service bug where an attacker could
cause relays and clients to crash, even if they were not built with
the --enable-expensive-hardening optio
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:44:15PM -0800, I wrote:
> The requested URL /torrents/files/tails-i386-2.10~rc1.torrent was not found
> on this server.
Probably because you don't want the release candidate.
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tails-210-out
https://tails.boum.org/install/download/
http
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Maxxer wrote:
> A couple of days ago I've set up a new bridge. I've tested it in my config
> and works fine
Great! Thanks for setting up a bridge. :)
>, but I've doubts it's getting published on the bridge
> database.
>
> I've configured it on both IPv4
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:10:05PM -0500, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:32:32PM +0100, BVpTuvb AVMV wrote:
> > What is preventing an attacker to start up a few mid-nodes and
> > enumerating all IPs and substracting those from the list of publicly
> > known entry-nodes to get a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Lolint wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could it be possible to implement a pluggable transport using i2p? The way
> this could work
> is that a server would function as a bridge node, and will also have the i2p
> router installed,
> and the client will connect to this
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:44:06AM +0100, m.aj...@tuta.io wrote:
> I was playing with the SAM protocol of I2Pd. When I typed some control
> characters by pressing some Ctrl+Alphabet keys in telnet window, the I2Pd on
> the other side crashed with a seg fault. It really freaked me out.
This conce
Hi tor-talk!
The PETS conference is where all of the academic privacy / anonymity
experts gather each year:
https://petsymposium.org/
This year it's in Minneapolis, July 18-21. Please consider joining us --
and if you do, be sure to stay for the hike on July 22, which is where
many interactions a
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:50:14PM +, CANNON wrote:
> Tor browser bundle is generally recommended for privacy due to
> its ability to blend in more with other people by having a
> commonly shared browser fingerprint.
Right. For more on what Tor Browser does (and doesn't do) at the
application
Motivated by a blog post comment:
https://blog.torproject.org/comment/269237#comment-269237
It looks like a growing number of connections from Tor exits are being
treated by Google as being Ukrainian.
Anecdotally, I've experienced it too -- Google news keeps wanting to
give me Ukrainian news.
Fo
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:30:44AM -0400, InterN0T wrote:
> The developer basically took Mike Tigas' iOS app and introduced several
> vulnerabilities to it that could be used to track users
To be clear, right now there are no ios apps that are on par with the
protections that Tor Browser provides
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:19:06PM +, Paul Templeton wrote:
> I got a cold caller email for the TOR mirror I have...
>
> >> Hi Paul,
>
> >>I appreciate you're busy but I just wanted to follow up on the email I sent
> >>you the other day. I've included a copy below for reference.
It's a sta
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 05:34:49PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 22-07-17 17:25, krishna e bera wrote:
> > On 22/07/17 08:14 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> >> Where can I find the tor ReleaseNotes for 0.3.0.9 that actually mention
> >> details about changes in 0.3.0.9?
> >
> > These?
> >
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 03:53:59PM -0700, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> There was also
> a long-standard concern about cryptographic strength mismatch in the
> sense that the cryptography used by onion services was weaker than the
> cryptography that's now used in TLS. (I think this concern was mis
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:02:54PM +0200, Aeris wrote:
> > Every time you enter a URL in the browser address line, your browser
> > requests the IP address of that URL from the DNS server. You can
> > instead enter the IP address yourself along with the webpage requested.
> > You could also just m
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:49:22PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> Here is the white paper with MTor design:
> https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/popets.2015.2016.issue-2/popets-2016-0003/popets-2016-0003.pdf
>
> And here is an implementation based on tor-0.2.3.25:
> https://github.com/multicastTor/mul
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 04:57:45PM -, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> How did TBB project people decide on the user agent which is:
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
>
> Panopticlick shows 1 in 30 browsers use it. I assume it's the most generic at
> this m
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Ben Tasker wrote:
> So his suggestion is portrayed as not sacrificing much, but actually
> sacrifices quite a lot.
This is a really important point. Thinking of onion space right now as
the sum total of all that it can be is cutting off all of the future
i
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:08:30PM -0700, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> I'd be happy to ask CloudFlare if they'd be willing to share this data
> (maybe in relative rather than absolute numeric terms, like "the number
> of people successfully completing a CAPTCHA per day from a Tor exit
> node on Septe
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 06:36:12PM +0200, tor-l...@jluehr.de wrote:
> I'm running
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D91F0F2683A264D8A6FDA7736D75FBC327F3F4F5
>
> Atlas shows, that the advertised bandwidth is around 54 KiB/s.
>
> The machine is running in a data center (hetzner) having:
>
>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 01:34:49PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> Why is there a *"recently-used.xbel"*, file in my Tor Browser installation
> directory - in path shown and labeled as file TYPE: "XBEL bookmarks"
> recording ACTUAL local file names, dates, times - they were accessed AND
> some DOWNLOA
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:24:45PM -0400, Benjamin Sullivan wrote:
> I have breaking news
Sorry for the disturbance everybody. This person is off-topic
for tor-talk, and I have set the person's "moderated" bit. (A good
thing too, since it caught a half dozen further emails before they
made it out
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 10:08:54PM -0400, Random User wrote:
> Take the example of a photo of a child
I also set the "moderated" bit on this person. Please take your
dog whistles elsewhere. This is not what Tor is for or about.
Sorry for the distraction everyone.
--Roger
--
tor-talk mailing li
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:18:07PM +0300, Yasir Al-Agl wrote:
> I've been working for some time on Tor multiplexing and circuit scheduling
> from a security perspective. I stumbled across the great work of Tang and
> Goldberg and their implementation of EWMA (2010), and while their main
> purpose w
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:38:23PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Seems like either unset/remove "DisableNetwork" in your torrc,
It is definitely not this.
Tor Browser uses DisableNetwork when it first starts to make sure that
your Tor doesn't try to interact with the network before you've selected
'co
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 07:22:18PM +0200, Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> > Keep in mind the false positives caused by crappy networks that just
> > resolve _all_ domains and then serve ads, a captive portal, etc. on
> > whatever IP address. Checking the https://check.torproject.org/api/ip
> > response
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:48:00PM +, George wrote:
> The route to determining the issue probably comes down to this error:
>
> Oct 29 12:50:06.000 [info] onion_skin_ntor_client_handshake(): Invalid
> result from curve25519 handshake: 4
Right. That message comes when you tried to do a circuit
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:47:51PM +0100, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> Note: Tor Browser 7.0.9 is a security bugfix release for macOS and
> Linux users only. Users on Windows are not affected and stay on Tor
> Browser 7.0.8.
>[...]
> The bug got reported to us on Thursday, October 26, by Filippo Cavalla
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 04:32:48PM +0200, Andre Wingor wrote:
> I'm under harassment, always under watching. At several year I have
> accumulated a collection of bad (aggressive) tor hosts and networks.I
> append those to torrc
> https://goo.gl/XKdEoT (google docs)
You're probably not doing yourse
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 07:39:42PM +0200, Andre Wingor wrote:
> On 12/28/17, COLLIER Ben wrote:
> > initial findings from my sociological research on Tor at a self-organised
>
> so it is easy to recover all secret users of !
> good try, officer Ben
Hello angry person who fears science,
This is
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:25:09PM -0800, jbclem wrote:
> Since I started using Tor browser I can't reach certain websites.
> www.craigslist.org is a good example. I get an error message that "this ip
> has been automatically blocked".
>
> I wonder if using Tor is causing this, or if I've be
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:25:58PM +0100, Marco Gruß wrote:
> the other day I just for the fun of it tried using a public
> relay as a non-obfuscated bridge - it actually works.
There are actually still some subtle bugs, e.g.
https://trac.torproject.org/1776
(I know it's closed, but I think that's
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Anon Hyde wrote:
> ip-api.com sees me, it means not only one
> Why he sees my ip in the Chrome and Opera, but under TBB does not
> What is the matter?!!
Nothing is the matter, and everything sounds like it's working as
intended?
Using any browser with Tor
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:40:01AM -0400, Wanderingnet wrote:
> 'Do it yourself' is in my view one of the astounding problems with Linux and
> the anon-sec issue.
Dear Wanderingnet,
Please consider that there are many thousands of people on this list,
and while a variety of discussion topics are
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:08:54AM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> "Level 3" on the charts is most likely the notorious 4.2.2.2...4.2.2.6.
> Those absolutely should not be used, aside from all the other reasons outlined
> in the article, they also hijack NXDOMAIN results for monetization of the
> us
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:19:49PM -0400, David Niklas wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm running firefox 61.0.1. I am trying to access the media outlet
> defcon's onion site. https://media.defcon.org/ points me to:
> http://m6rqq6kocsyugo2laitup5nn32bwm3lh677chuodjfmggczoafzwfcad.onion/
>
> I have network.dns
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 06:35:40PM -0400, David Niklas wrote:
> 2. Where is the source code?
Building Tor Browser is ugly because of another critical feature that
it provides: reproducible, aka deterministic, builds. You can read more
about that feature here:
https://reproducible-builds.org/
and t
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:44:26PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> For example, how did Facebook come around to have an
> onion? Was it just that Alec Muffett championed it? Did complaints from
> excluded users play a role? Positive or negative?
They did some internal measurements and realized that the n
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 04:06:27PM +0200, Cristian Consonni wrote:
> I have a couple of questions about the "Tor Network settings" in Tor
> browser.
>
> Tor browser can be configure to use bridges and/or pluggable transport
> if needed. However it may happen that these PT are exposed on port that
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:09:10PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Changes in version 0.3.4.6-rc - 2018-08-06
> Tor 0.3.4.6-rc fixes several small compilation, portability, and
> correctness issues in previous versions of Tor. This version is a
> release candidate: if no serious bugs are found
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 09:07:17AM +0100, Colin Baxter wrote:
> There's a typo in https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-unix. That
> page says "src/or/tor" runs tor directly from the git directory. The
> path should be "src/app/tor"
Thanks -- I've fixed it.
(Actually, it wasn't wrong yet: that
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 08:08:03PM +, panoramix.druida wrote:
> From my understanding when a Tor proxy is started it downloads a list of
> relays from one of the ten Directory Authority Servers listed here:
> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/flag:authority
>
> Am I right?
Almos
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote:
> It might also be that half-duplex communication (even if implemented
> with humans saying "over") could bring benefits as this would allow you
> to increase the buffer sizes without having people talking over each other.
Reminds me
501 - 600 of 634 matches
Mail list logo
