Re: [tor-talk] Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or is) funded by the US government

2014-07-23 Thread Martin S
You mean ARPA-net? Oops On 23 Jul 2014, Sarah wrote: >Shh, don't let them find out that the military has had ties to the >Internet since before it was the Internet. The concentrated hysteria >might warp the space-time continuum. > >On July 23, 2014 9:02:46 AM EDT, Moritz Bartl >wrote: >>

[tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-13 Thread Martin S
ts that is generally agreed on? Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-14 Thread Martin S
rvice(s) on the server in the future. Is there a document somewhere that describes the differences between what I've been doing and using the Torbrowser? /Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torprojec

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-14 Thread Martin S
Apart from the quoted docs, I was more thinking a detailed how-to/why-for kindof thing. /Martin S 2014-08-13 23:05 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine : > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: >> The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your >> r

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-14 Thread Martin S
, or with stone age laws regarding Sexual and Reproductive Health or vulnerable to third party military forces. And so on. Therefore there are reasons to protect the browsing habits of the local offices. /Martin S 2014-08-14 19:03 GMT+02:00 Soul Plane : > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Marti

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-14 Thread Martin S
The above may also relate to our partners, which definately shouldn't access our office through VPN. 2014-08-14 20:07 GMT+02:00 Martin S : > I am planning to use it as a proxy with services for the offices. Not > as a VPN to our own office. > > The thing is that the offices al

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-18 Thread Martin S
ecurity features that Tor Browser >> gives you: >> https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/ > > No arguments there. > > Whether or not they are missing out on "performance" and which > part of the chain is to blame is a different question, though. > > Fa

[tor-talk] Hidden services, what is recommended

2014-08-26 Thread Martin S
er communications or document sharing. Any comments welcome. /Martin S -- Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden services, what is recommended

2014-08-26 Thread Martin S
hough is as a game communication tool for Eve Online =) Thanks for your thoughts! /Martin S -- Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

[tor-talk] hidden key server access

2014-09-01 Thread Martin S
too busy. Try again in a few moments." etc. What should I check first? /Martin S -- Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

[tor-talk] Fail to connect to hidden service

2014-09-01 Thread Martin S
I get "Unable to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at ADDRESS" when using the Tor Browser. The main address (:80) shows the site as expected. What should I check first to get this working? Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.o

Re: [tor-talk] Fail to connect to hidden service

2014-09-02 Thread Martin S
0.0.1: SOCKS5 host unreachable" even on the standard :80 port that was working earlier. I've started tor, privoxy and the web server by now. Any suggestions on what I am missing here? (I think I've been tinkering with this for a tad too long). 2014-09-02 9:44 GMT+02:00 Martin S : > W

Re: [tor-talk] Fail to connect to hidden service

2014-09-02 Thread Martin S
IPv4 2360226 0t0 TCP > 127.0.0.1:43644->127.0.0.1:80 (ESTABLISHED) > ... > ... > ... > tor1307 debian-tor 82u IPv4 2360227 0t0 TCP > 127.0.0.1:43645->127.0.0.1:80 (ESTABLISHED) > ... > ... > ... > tor1307 debian-tor 100u IPv4

Re: [tor-talk] Fail to connect to hidden service

2014-09-03 Thread Martin S
Finally, I found the source of my incompetence now it works. Problem was in the torrc file: it lacked a HiddenServicePort stanza for the service. . =/ Adding it, restarting the tor and service and now it is up and accessible for the world at large. Thanks for your time though =) /Martin S

[tor-talk] socks connect

2014-09-10 Thread Martin S
he torrc on the server says SocksPort 9050 SocksPolicy accept * but still refuses connections it seems. Any ideas? Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] socks connect

2014-09-10 Thread Martin S
. > > Hope that helps, > --Roger > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- Regards, Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] socks connect

2014-09-10 Thread Martin S
at is anything to do with the problem? I'm not getting any errors, only warnings in the /var/log/tor/log file. /Martin S 2014-09-10 13:59 GMT+02:00 Martin S : > I've tried connecting with "Tor/Privacy (SOCKS5)" but still get the > same error =( > "From the Tor

Re: [tor-talk] What are some free and private email providers?

2013-10-13 Thread Martin S
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 08:48:02 PM Antispam 06 wrote: > On 24.05.2013 00:50, Moritz Bartl wrote: > > On 23.05.2013 22:23, Nathan Suchy wrote: > >> I'm looking for email providers with decent support, a good amount of > >> storage, and that protect your privacy. Do you know any? It's not fre