2014-08-13 23:05 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu>: > I guess the broader question is what the original poster was trying > to do -- if the goal is to give Tor's protection to everybody in the > organization, and the way they did it was to leave everybody using > Internet Explorer, and then redirect outgoing traffic into Privoxy > which sends it through Tor, then the users are missing out on all > the application-level privacy and security features that Tor Browser > gives you: > https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/
Basically this (or Firefox, or Chrome as it might be). This is the scenario for our office in Stockholm, where the main part of our users are. For the users in our foreign offices the Torbrowser (which may or may not be considered hideously slow) is obviously an obvious alternative. Also, we are considering running (a) hidden service(s) on the server in the future. Is there a document somewhere that describes the differences between what I've been doing and using the Torbrowser? /Martin S -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
