Re: [tor-talk] Email provider for privacy-minded folk

[set > where, & how is it stored, for how long?] Specific location will depend on the browser and implementation. There may be guidance in the RFC but I can't remember the specifics. You could check https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6797 and the chrome/firefox implementations to get the exact deta

Re: [tor-talk] Bogus security warning?

On 21 February 2013 23:27, k e bera wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:26:40 +0100 > Moritz Bartl wrote: > >> For some reason, the update check signaled/signals 2.3.25-3 as current >> version for the last 24 hours or so ( >> https://check.torproject.org/RecommendedTBBVersions ). As user reports >> s

Re: [tor-talk] Where can I get Tor without the browser?

All the different options for downloading including the source code. https://www.torproject.org/download/download.html.en On 02/21/2013 07:51 PM, Robin Kipp wrote: Hi Roger, Download the Tor Browser Bundle for OS X, unpack it, and use the Tor binary that you find inside. (In Linux, it's in

Re: [tor-talk] Tails Mac support [Was: Training Journalists in Istanbul]

Hi, Runa A. Sandvik wrote (04 Feb 2013 15:12:51 GMT) : > - Tails has very limited support [8] for Apple hardware. 23 out of 30 > attendees were Mac users. I tried booting Tails on my MacBook Air, but > OS X was unable to find the USB stick. OK. As discussed on IRC, we're aware of this serious iss

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

Hi, Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) : > intrigeri: >> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the >> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release. >> [...] > I'll discuss it with nickm and see what he thinks. A tar.gz isn't too > much

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

On 22/02/13 17:09, intrigeri wrote: > FTR, I'm waiting for an authoritative upstream answer on this before > I upload 1.3 to the Debian archive. Ditto for Fedora. > I'm more and more tempted to take the Git tag as the canonical form of > distribution of the complete upstream release, which it se

[tor-talk] latest TBB changelog / trac discrepancies

Many tickets are claimed to be solved, but if you click on the tickets, they are still open. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8270 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8178 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3944 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticke

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) : >> intrigeri: >>> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the >>> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release. >>> [...] > >> I'll discuss

Re: [tor-talk] [Tails-dev] Tails Mac support [Was: Training Journalists in Istanbul]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:58 PM, intrigeri wrote: > The remaining part of the problem will be solved by adding UEFI > support [3] to Tails. We're currently making plans with Debian Live > upstream so that this support is added there, and benefits all Debian > Live systems. > > [3] https://tails.bo

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

intrigeri: > Hi, > > Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) : >> intrigeri: >>> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the >>> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release. >>> [...] > >> I'll discuss it with nickm and see what he thinks. A

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

Nick Mathewson: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) : >>> intrigeri: A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release.