Nick Mathewson: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM, intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) : >>> intrigeri: >>>> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the >>>> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release. >>>> [...] >> >>> I'll discuss it with nickm and see what he thinks. A tar.gz isn't too >>> much of a problem but I'm not sure of where I'd put it. >> >> FTR, I'm waiting for an authoritative upstream answer on this before >> I upload 1.3 to the Debian archive. >> >> I'm more and more tempted to take the Git tag as the canonical form of >> distribution of the complete upstream release, which it seems to be in >> practice, given there's no tarball that I can find 10 days after the >> release was announced (and again, the Git tag suits me well). > > Hm. It looks like Jacob is might just be completely hosed right now, > so I've uploaded a tarball to > http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/torsocks-1.3.tar.gz and a signature to > http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/torsocks-1.3.tar.gz.asc. I hope we get > get these put somewhere more official soon.
I think this is probably a fine idea but I'd like them to go on people.torproject.org or into torproject.org/disk/torsocks/ - does that seem like a good place? > > As an extra wrinkle, this is my first time running "make dist" on > torsocks, so it's possible that "make dist" has bugs that don't appear > when using the tags. Please open tickets if so; caveat haxxor. :/ > We should probably make dist in some standard way - perhaps on a build machine we trust? All the best, Jake _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
