Martin S:
> Considering the responses in this thread, I am now testing the Tor BB.
> However the startup time for this is monstruous. Running through the
> initial setup routine, the thing just seems to hang on connecting to
> Tor network. What could be wrong?
Please contact the Tor help desk: . I
Considering the responses in this thread, I am now testing the Tor BB.
However the startup time for this is monstruous. Running through the
initial setup routine, the thing just seems to hang on connecting to
Tor network. What could be wrong?
2014-08-16 15:23 GMT+02:00 Fabian Keil :
> Roger Dingle
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> > The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your
> > reason for using Privoxy?
> > In general, I find Tor to be faster overall, since overhauls in
> > TorBrowser - when they stopped using Priv
The above may also relate to our partners, which definately shouldn't
access our office through VPN.
2014-08-14 20:07 GMT+02:00 Martin S :
> I am planning to use it as a proxy with services for the offices. Not
> as a VPN to our own office.
>
> The thing is that the offices almost totally lack any
I am planning to use it as a proxy with services for the offices. Not
as a VPN to our own office.
The thing is that the offices almost totally lack any local IT
resources and expertise. They are also situated in countries, or work
with countries that are Democracy and/or Human Rights challenged, o
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Martin S wrote:
> I've set up a Tor and Privoxy chain for our organisation, especially
> for our courntry offices, of which some work in high risk countries.
>
Pardon me asking this maybe it's obvious but why wouldn't you use an
intranet VPN instead of Tor for yo
Apart from the quoted docs, I was more thinking a detailed
how-to/why-for kindof thing.
/Martin S
2014-08-13 23:05 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine :
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>> The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your
>> reason for using Priv
2014-08-13 23:05 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine :
> I guess the broader question is what the original poster was trying
> to do -- if the goal is to give Tor's protection to everybody in the
> organization, and the way they did it was to leave everybody using
> Internet Explorer, and then redirect out
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your
> reason for using Privoxy?
> In general, I find Tor to be faster overall, since overhauls in
> TorBrowser - when they stopped using Privoxy (& likely started other
> speed
On 8/13/2014 2:20 PM, Martin S wrote:
I've set up a Tor and Privoxy chain for our organisation, especially
for our courntry offices, of which some work in high risk countries.
After some brief tests I notice performance issues (it's somewhat slow
opening new pages). is there any suggestions for p
I've set up a Tor and Privoxy chain for our organisation, especially
for our courntry offices, of which some work in high risk countries.
After some brief tests I notice performance issues (it's somewhat slow
opening new pages). is there any suggestions for performance
improvements that is generall
On 02/16/2014 05:25 AM, tor-admin wrote:
Hi,
the metrics page shows that the performance of the Tor network degraded during
the last 7 days from around 1.5 sec per 50kb towards 2 secs to complete a 50kb
request:
https://metrics.torproject.org/performance.html?graph=torperf&start=2013-02-18&end=
tor-admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the metrics page shows that the performance of the Tor network degraded
> during
> the last 7 days from around 1.5 sec per 50kb towards 2 secs to complete a
> 50kb
> request:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/performance.html?graph=torperf&start=2013-02-18&end=2014-0
Hi,
the metrics page shows that the performance of the Tor network degraded during
the last 7 days from around 1.5 sec per 50kb towards 2 secs to complete a 50kb
request:
https://metrics.torproject.org/performance.html?graph=torperf&start=2013-02-18&end=2014-02-16&source=all&filesize=50kb#torpe
Hello,
On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:38 , Roger Dingledine wrote:
> o Major features (performance):
> - When built to use OpenSSL 1.0.1, and built for an x86 or x86_64
> instruction set, take advantage of OpenSSL's AESNI, bitsliced, or
> vectorized AES implementations as appropriate. These can
15 matches
Mail list logo
