http://lmgtfy.com/?q=CVE-2017-0380
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] More recent rpm somewhere?
> Local Time: September 17, 2017 12:53 PM
> UTC Time: September 17, 2017 12:53 PM
> From: bnag...@gmail.com
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>
&
Hello AMuse,
we faced the same about 1-2 month ago. Actuall people use fail2ban which
creates abuse mails to you provider.
Thats not new. But recently the abuse mails have risen to numbers which
lead us to believe there are acutally more people abusing ssh via tor
than people really using it.
In
purposes of documenting
the approximate ratio of "complaints / traffic processed", these nodes have
handled ~515TB and are using the recommended reduced exit policy.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy_______
tor-rela
ng the recommended
>> reduced exit policy.
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
comfortable
> sharing. I am not able to provide legal advice, but if this looks like a
> situation where legal advice will be required, I have some contacts who may
> be able to provide assistance. Thank you for running exit relays. > On Jun 8,
> 2018, at 5:43 AM, Matt Traudt wrote:
Hello,
My tor exit has been building up reputation for months but still fails to
saturate a 100 Mbps line while barely using any CPU. Therefore, I recently
decided to start a second tor process on the same server which is now
slowly building up reputation. I gave the second process a different
I need some help.
My dedicated server is running debian and is new, set up by my
serverhoster.
I want to run a TOR-Relay:
- It should always update to latest stable automatically.
- It should be save.
I will edit the torrc by myself. What i need is simple copy+paste
codeline for:
- isntall
to deal with rsa key?
will tor be utoupdated at new release with "apt-get -y upgrade" or how
to manage automated actuality?
On Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:46 PM, Julien ROBIN
wrote:
Hi !
You can try a mix between this (ultra simple), from
https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian
Hi!
> let's begin: is it possible to run 5 bridges on one low-end VPS?
[...]
> and would 5 processes be too much for a 2-core VPS with
> 256mb memory?
I did run a single Relay on a small vps (2 GB VRam 2 Ghz VCore). Tor
itself did run smooth but the VPS was unable to mana
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
hi there.
0.2.5.12 on debian jessie: "service tor reload" causes message:
"Job for tor.service failed. See 'systemctl status tor.service' and
'journalctl -xn' for details."
it says something like "failed to
simple stuff that
works like:
shell, ps, tail, less, and vi
./tor
kill -hup
It's a prerequisite before trying to read and figure out whatever
abstractions
were put upon you by your OS or package.
Search, manpade, and run the stuff you quoted.
______
hi,
about that following lines in the mail from Moritz Bartl.
[tor-relays] Please enable IPv6 on your relay!
In short, you add:
ORPort [IPv6::address]:port
IPv6Exit 1
ExitPolicy reject6 *:*
shouldnt there be a "a" in the first line? how important ist the letter
a? i guess some oper
------
Betreff:
Re: [tor-relays] a line "enable IPv6 on your relay"
Von:
yl
Datum:
Sonntag, 24. Mai 2015 19:54
An:
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Am 24.05.2015 um 19:25 schrieb tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com:
shouldnt there be a "a" in the first l
hi, its very easy:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/IPv6RelayHowto
just put your IPv6 adress somewhrere within square brackets into torrc.
ORPort [2001:DB8::1]:9050
- afaik it shouldnt matter where you put it into torrc -
also put
IPv6Exit 1
ExitPolicy reject6 *:*
somewhere in
indeed, thanks for you promptly interverntion.
it feels good to see the mb/s rising!
also tor websurfing already responds faster subjectively to me
GIGGITY ((:
Am Montag, 25. Mai 2015 16:32 schrieb Marcus :
Hey,
thank’s a lot my relay is now also able to support Tor. After over 2
weeks
hi,
is that IPv6 adress valid for example "becks" [2a01:4f8:162:7345::2]?
how do i know if IPv6 is correct and reachable?
thanks
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org schreef op 05/06/15 om 14:00:
> Updating tor to get fix for #15083? (Elliott Jin)
>
> - Is Tor 0.2.5.10 (git-43a5f3d91e726291) actually the newest stable
> version, or did I mess something up when trying to update tor?
> - Would it be
I want to investigate why obfs4 is nearly never used.
hi,
may you want to have a look into tails bug #9268 adressing some obfs
issue
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
hey
seems like avira is joining us running 24 exits through as24875. seems
to be about double the size of mozillas relays.
Yay!
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor
SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
german exit for https://youtu.be/ is breaking functionality due to
disunity between google and gema. since years now. anyhow german exits
shouldnt block youtube ip's, now should they?
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
exact, thats what im talking about
Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015 23:28 schrieb cacahuatl
:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:00:53PM +0200,
tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
german exit for https://youtu.be/ is breaking functionality due to
disunity
between google and gema. since years
x27;m not sure how useful a relay in an exotic location, if
it's
expensive to run and pushes very little traffic. Maybe others can
comment.
I think it is reasonably priced; $20USD/month for unmetered 100Mb/s.
I am willing to contribute money to Tor because I believe in what it
suppor
from
crusty old botnet bots running ancient versions
of the Tor daemon.
But all that bot traffic creates a lot
of statistical "background noise," and
so may be providing a service in making
it more difficult for advanced adversaries
to perform traffic correlation a
Just thoughts: To throttle how about assign twisted consensus weight to
outdated versions? Highest consensus weight to slowest relays and vice
versa? Wouldnt they overload/throttle themselfes nicely?
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2015 10:24 schrieb
tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com:
Would be
154.35.132.70
reject *.*
isnt it a bad idea? will i be flagged as bad exit by reducing exit like
so^? wouldnt it take some load from the network while excude all
complains cause this are tor-friendly ips?
thanks meanwhile
Am Freitag, 21. August 2015 02:23 schrieb
schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
:
On 3 Sep 2015, at 14:55, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
hi,
what do you think about high restricted exits?
i thought about solely accept some single ips.
In order to be assigned the Exit flag, a relay needs to exit to at
least a IPv4 /8
u should reduce your exit policy and give it a try:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
Am Sonntag, 6. September 2015 06:06 schrieb Patrick O'Doherty
:
hey all,
I'm look
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#UpgradeOrMove
I want to upgrade/move my relay. How do I keep the same key?
When upgrading your Tor relay, or running it on a different computer,
the important part is to keep the same identity key (stored in
"keys/secret_id_key" in your Dat
It appears that First Tech Federal Credit Union is blocking all Tor
nodes (including non-exit nodes) from connecting to their website,
http://www.firsttechfed.com
This seems ... misguided on their part. Blocking exit nodes is one
thing, but preventing random people who happen to run a Tor middle
. September 2015 06:36 schrieb Tor Stuff
:
I have been running this node (nickname 'Geheimschreiber') with
fingerprint C69D24F9353E16D85E82B4A9E4571DFAF6DCF531 for many months
so expected Atlas/Globe to pickup my changed capabilities fairly
quickly.
Am I being too impatient or have
alternately, limit the
bandwidth
to stop it fluctuating so much.
Tim (teor)
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relay
, non-exit + exit relays and more than
one
/16 network).
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______
tor-relays mailing list
st people" with
"grow the network as large as possible, so we can be robust against
more subtle attackers".
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
whos then receiving home-addresses from longtime relay-owners earned
t-shirts?!
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 21:00 schrieb nusenu
:
tor weather hasn't been working for me for a long time and AFAIK it
is
not maintained...
_______
tor-r
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 08:57 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner
:
Have you restarted
Tor after you made changes?
Yes. After ive done changes i always restart the Server hard. Tor is
Running As Daemon so hours after restart i just do a check at
atlas.torproject.org
Hi!
> Hi All
> Is it possible to schedule the time when bandwith will looks as follow:
>
> 8:00 - 18:00 - Tor relay bandwith 250kb/s
>
> 18:00 - 8:00 - Tor relay bandwith 10 000kb/s
>
>
> How may I schedule this in tor relay ? Is it possible to limit traffic
> on
hi,
wondering what happened to consensus lately? weight-drops, list says
was missing authority signatures
? thanks
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Mozilla <3
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
follwing advice:
For each Tor process set in torrc:
BandwidthRate 1300 bytes
BandwidthBurst 13375000 bytes
So you end up with
Server1: 4x 1300 bytes = 4x13MB/s
Server2: 4x 1300 bytes = 4x13MB/s
(in each direction)
104+104=208 MB/s
You hopefully will end up with ~540TB per month.
(oh
hi,
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ...
guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages?
thanks
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
since not declaring $family could cause risk to Tor-Network: action
should take place if relayoperator is not responding&changing config,
right?
Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 20:28 schrieb nusenu
:
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ...
and commit 2f8cf524b.
Tim
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject
On 10.11.2011 11:48, David wrote:
> I just wanted to let everyone know that my two Tor nodes have been
> raided (+all my computer equipment and everything that could store data).
>
> I'm not sure what triggered all this unwanted attention, but I suspect
> that it's th
6 months.
--
Exocet node
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=028d9bcc8204f10d93d8625903a723e50d0b3a89
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
o packet to the dedicated port). The service is running for more than
2 weeks now.
My question is : does obfsproxy advertise like the regular bridge service ?
Best regards.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproj
jvoisin via tor-relays wrote:
> Is this something other operators have seen too or are we alone?
You're not alone, they're desperately trying to advertise themselves
and you shouldn't give them any form of importance by replying to them.
In fact, they will probably discard
We receive this mostly from France and Germany. We figured out that
they downloaded the Tor Browser then looked at the Tor Circuit widget
and just collected the addresses they could see there.
This is the same as when Police, Attention Seekers, Cyber White
Knights, Censors and other scoundrels c
ice.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
lacklist, they maintain a whitelist, that is,
everything is blocked but what's on the list.
The result is that people can't even update software, things start to
break and then they are forced to lift the filtering up a little bit
which sometimes result in making bootstrapping Tor possible.
Vasilis,
It turned out to be a pretty "non-event". The jurisdiction was a relatively
small one on the east coast of the US. The staff of the prosecutor's office
were all very professional and pleasant to work with. Phoul coordinated the
production of a letter from the Tor Pr
t let these new relays turn into
Conrad and Nathaniel 'Cordially' Suchy's DeadGreyPonyIT show again.
No one else cares about you and your confused lackeys attempts to be big-boy
tor relay operators.
If you wish to join the network again, please do it in the style of someone
resp
.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:08 PM, Nathaniel 'Cordially' Suchy
wrote:
> Following up,
>
> I am not longer associated with Greypony IT nor Mr. Rockenhaus. If Mr.
> Rockenhaus decides to discuss his next Tor Exit Hosting Service do know
>
me directly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Conrad_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
hello, I managed until now the relay tor-turing -
8456DFA94161CDD99E480C2A2992C366C6564410 - ip 62.210.254.132 for four years and
it was in the list of Fallback Directory. However he did not answer for 2
weeks, the support of my hosting provider told me that the motherboard is out
of order
Well, can be hard to say just looking at that number. Linux is not Windows.. it
doesn't have to reboot every time it's patched.
A tor op
Originalmeddelande
På 4 okt. 2019 14:35, Steve Snyder < swsny...@snydernet.net> skrev:
On 10/4/19 7:39 AM, li...@for-privacy
delegated our filtering to third parties and never felt
that we should do so. We get thousands of brute force attacks a day,
SSH, SMTP AUTH, whatever. And so what? It does absolutely nothing.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
ht
Hello
I was thinking of perhaps asking and checking if the list has some comments on
thoughts I have.
I'm attaching a picture, hope that's not a problem, guess it's better than
providing a URL to a file upload place (or maybe that's ok too?).
I've been running a TOR b
Thank you for sharing that.
It's obvious that they are either using third-parties or that they are
afraid of being bullied by the Spamhaus gang.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/ma
an some website or brute
force an SMTP relay.
Then they triggered the filtering in fear of being put in blacklists.
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Version: ProtonMail
wnUEARYKAAYFAmFJOgQAIQkQ07hp34FMyg4WIQSgEMifmnN5ohFWvfnTuGnf
gUzKDs8DAP4hSvlEPrlDkIY5vlLULhJHuNVbq/UT3r5mfBg/cg+p0wEAltfV
bPlU/3wfg7j0b31h6R4g+Ik+96fkoq9VTqiydQg=
=6AAW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
publickey - tor@bleedangel.com - 0xA010C89F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
one day previous.FYI all, if you show overloaded, it may not be tor, it may be that distcc compiling you did yesterday!On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:39, Silvia/Hiro <h...@torproject.org> wrote: Hello all,One of our goals with our current performance work is to reduce theoverload of relays
looking for!
Thank you
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 27th, 2021 at 10:23 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
> George,
>
> The referenced support article provides recommendations as to what might be
> causing the overloaded state, but it doesn't pro
, September 28th, 2021 at 11:31 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
> David,
>
> This is exactly the type of information I was hoping for. You should make
> this an article and link it to the overloaded support page.
>
> I guess I assumed that Tor preformed external timeout mon
and report overloaded states, but I only know so much about Tor.Hope this helps.Respectfully,Gary
On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 10:28:42 AM PDT, Bleedangel Tor Admin wrote:
Agreed . My relay is wellBelow all of the thresholds for “overloaded”, for gods sake 64gb ram and 12 cpus should be adequate for a tor relay? 10gb connection?I’ve asked multiple times for help trying to figure this out and have gotten zero response. It seems to be very difficult to get any help
ny
other color) "recovery" indicator for 72 hours. At least the relay operator
would know that the overloaded state has been repaired.
2) metricsport
- This is such an enigma to someone who is not familiar with prometheus, or
torrc beyond the basics. As a matter of fact, when installing the
Can you link to where I can edit the torproject.org documentation? I cannot find this feature.Thanks Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 06:48, <li...@for-privacy.net> wrote: On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 8:55:01 PM CEST potlatch via tor-relays wrote:> Tor has always
You are running 0.4.5.8, maybe updating to a newer version of tor will help?Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:02, Georg Koppen <g...@torproject.org> wrote: Eddie:> Looking at tor metrics, one of my bridges is showing as off-line:> B080140DC1BAB5B86D1CE5A4CA2E
wholeheartedly believe in more status indicators on the search page:Green - goodRed - offlineYellow - overloaded**Blue - was overloaded within 72 hours ago but currently is not**Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:25, Arlen Yaroslav via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.
The problem is that it’s *not* currently overloaded, there’s nothing to see. Maybe you can check your syslogs for anything out of the ordinary system-wide? Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:09, Arlen Yaroslav via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
If you upgraded tor as a package on your Linux OS recently, it may have overwritten your torrc with defaults? It’s a long shot!Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 12:52, sysmanager7 via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote: I was notified by Uptime Robo
Add Tor's repo in your system:
https://support.torproject.org/apt/tor-deb-repo/
Then install unattended-upgrades too:
https://wiki.debian.org/UnattendedUpgrades
Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern {
"origin=*";
};
This way (by including all origins) you basically keep al
Hello. How can I limit the number of transmitted packets to 190,000? The VPS
server constantly turns on the network limitation due to the large number of
transmitted packets.
--- Forwarded Message ---
От: borisic...@protonmail.com
Дата: пятница, 14 марта 2025 г., 11:44
Тема: tor-relay
Hi all,
I have been operating the relays
- Bazinga B198C0B4B8C551F174FBB841A172616E3DB3124D
- JPsi2 F6EC46933CE8D4FAD5CCDAA8B1C5A377685FC521
for about 10 years.
The hosting provider stops providing their current service and their
successor services are not Tor-friendly anymore.
Hence, these
it recover
if you wait a while?
I think it might have not recognized the address has changed, because it
doesn't recover after a while (I waited around 3~ days)
There are no firewall rules that would intervene with this process, on
the MikroTik side it's just an DST-NAT rule to my to
Greetings fellow relay operators!
I'm currently running a tor relay on a dynamic IP Address connection,
usually my ISP gives me a new address every day or so-
Lately [for the past like week or so- /can't remember when it started
happening/], I have to manually restart it when
favor of a scheme where the process of joining a family is
authenticated.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Isaac, <mailto:t...@sechsnulldrei.org> t...@sechsnulldrei.org
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Good morning Dakota,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have added MyFamily records to the torrc file
on each of the three nodes. It likely doesn’t matter on the middle relay, but
it can’t hurt.
Thank you for your email,
Isaac, t...@sechsnulldrei.org
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor
s in their homes to utilize the wastefully
underutilized bandwidth they're paying for.
Make your day great,
Isaac, t...@sechsnulldrei.org
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Nagaev Boris
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 1
Hi there,
If your exit node has been online for more than two months with little hassle
from the ISP, be sure to update the wiki at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs with your exit
node's ISP information. And thank you for your contribution to the Tor ne
Hi AJ,
First, thank you for supporting Tor!
Second, you're smart to contact the library, as IT would immediately shut
down the idea as they don't want to receive more abuse emails than they
already do (I know we did when I worked in academia). An additional
resource you may wish to r
Good morning,
Relay operators often receive gratitude on this list for running relays, but
let's not forget the directory operators - those individuals/organizations
who are more central to The Tor Network and run their directory servers at a
higher personal risk level than the relay oper
sed bandwidth for these
> relays. Arm shows between 600 and 1200 concurrent circuits (total
> of inbound, outbound and exit) and average traffic consumption is
> 5-6 TB per month (total both download and upload). I think this can
> be improved, but how?
What does the CPU usage of the t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> root@tor:/ # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep aes cat: /proc/cpuinfo: No
> such file or directory
According to a stackoverflow page [2], you can look for hints
indicating the existence of AES-NI support in "sysctl hw" and
/var/run/dm
Hi,
I've set up a bridge node in the previous few weeks, but have had to put
a bandwidth limit on, as I only have 10TB of traffic per month before my
ISP will start throttling me to 100k/sec.
I wondered whether it was more helpful to the Tor network as a whole to
have have a very fast
Thanks, that's what I thought, but wasn't sure.
I'll play around for the next few days to see how fast I can get it
without triggering hibernation.
L
On 2014-10-12 02:04, teor wrote:
On 12 Oct 2014, at 09:32 , tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
wrote:
Date: Sat, 11 Oc
e lately.
On December 1st, the tor process' memory consumption went up and up
until the Linux kernel decided to kill it. Monit has subsequently
restarted it, and it settles at roughly 1.7 GB since then.
The logs of the corresponding days have already been rotated out, so I
cannot post the exact
z67fTwXmg14crSj63xYyZHGUY1h1gGphH/SG7HdSF
+MLwJ+HKc2R9Qj0zVn3yCweybwMTgEh+d4MfkD42+dFvsebG5Kpy/vKse/IC/laM
BpgPcWM3TBYkls4cq+/GzgX/qe9oeNCt8RB7H0Rq3nLdNvS7SBXZWCB+TWsq8XFr
B9brTZWqzfUsqkxJARyDlUmkiygAQUliRq2ZR4I9ayWSaZw1LBKAfvX2XCg1+m9v
uHVr3hEUDx5ocfUJPQ5g
=QB5r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
access the services behind it.
That's the way I look at the issue, in any case.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I have setup a Tor Bridge for everyone and I am unsure how it gets
published so I will post the info here so it can get put into the
consensus. The bridge is 173.246.106.35:443 I hope this bridge will help
more users access the network.
--
yetanothertoru...@riseup.net
Bridges I run
Link requested subdomains to the relay's fingerprint, and require all
change/update requests to be signed by the node's keys, and have some
validation that the node can be found on the network (and is an exit
node). This will ensure only Tor exit nodes can apply, and that nodes
can o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 28.11.2015 17:43, David Schulz wrote:
> can i get problems as an german citizen with an non exit tor relay
> in germany with an italien ip? not realy or? i think of TMG § 8.
As a non-exit relay operator, you are most certainly not go
hmm weight-drops again? i am loosing my whole traffic / consensus
weight... since 7 pm CET.
Random Tor Node Operator
Am 09.12.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
On 9 Dec 2015, at 06:07, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com
<mailto:tor-server-c
Hi,
you didn't get the V2Dir flag with AccountingMax set on... I had to have
the same experience with that.
Random Tor Node Operator
hi
Am 13.12.2015 um 23:32 schrieb Lucas Werkmeister:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all!
For some reaso
MywZE44bJr+SYfgcUn3SWNFY4VrO9qf2Uoh8VtKbHsGOj+SLdG1nLnQOfELU
eaCkGMX0sBif5lhe/Tr+
=v/3o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 26.02.2016 05:15, torser...@datakanja.de wrote:
> * Next, i noticed a frequent (daily) behavior of the Tor server
> dropping traffic to around zero. Inspecting this, let me to
> understand, my provider was disconnecting me and reassigning a new
> IP on a daily basis
501 - 600 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
