Vasilis,
It turned out to be a pretty "non-event". The jurisdiction was a relatively
small one on the east coast of the US. The staff of the prosecutor's office
were all very professional and pleasant to work with. Phoul coordinated the
production of a letter from the Tor Project in record time that I was able to
attach to my subpoena response.
In the end, the whole incident took ~4 hours to handle, and I suspect that any
future ones would be much quicker now that I have all of the contacts in place
and the attorneys up to speed.
In hindsight:
* Having a supportive and Tor-savvy ISP (Hurricane Electric) was a big plus.
* Having an attorney designated who is familiar with Tor /in advance/ would
have saved time.
Your mileage may vary.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 08:42, Vasilis <a...@torproject.org> wrote:
> Hi IPfail,
>
> "IPfail (Tor Admin)":
>
>> The one I received seemed very reasonable in language and scope, and came
>> with contact information for someone with a title that implied that they
>> work specifically on "cyber crimes". I am currently anticipating that this
>> will be a non-event.
>>
>> Either way, I wanted to share this event with the relay community since one
>> of the questions that I had when first starting out was how much
>> "administrative overhead" could be expected as a result of operating relays.
>
> Thank you for reporting this to the mailing list.
>
> In case there is a resolution that you can publicly share it may be useful for
> current or upcoming relay operators/servers in US.
>
> Cheers,
> ~Vasilis
> --
> Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F 39FC 03EB B382 7470 5FBF 70B1 D126 0162
> Pubkey: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5FBF70B1D1260162
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
