DNS Caching (not Cash) simple does a normal lookup for an DNS domain
requested and remembers it for some period of time so that it can answer
from its cache of known addresses in microseconds (instead of the
hundreds of milliseconds it might take to inquire over the internet) the
next time that
> 30 new exits at Frantec. Did you follow the AUP and send Francisco a ticket
> _beforehand_? Reverse DNS! Exit policy Port: 465, 587!
> https://buyvm.net/acceptable-use-policy/
No, we did not pay attention to their AUP. We have long been using their
services for proxy and there were no problems.
Hi all
I have my first Tor relay up und running. It's currently installed on a little
desktop computer with an Intel i5 9500T CPU. My Internet connection is 10Gb/s
symetric. From this bandwidth, I would be able to spend a good part for
supporting the Tor network.
With that little machine, it
Does Cash DNS give some advantages in safety?
On 2022-04-08 08:06, Thoughts wrote:
> Note that any dns caching software would help, unbound is just one
> popular one. dnsmasq is another. In fact, if you wanted to, you
> could use the full bind package and configure it for caching and
> forwarding
On Sunday, April 10, 2022 2:04:02 AM CEST onion...@riseup.net wrote:
> > 30 new exits at Frantec. Did you follow the AUP and send Francisco a
> > ticket
> > _beforehand_? Reverse DNS! Exit policy Port: 465, 587!
> > https://buyvm.net/acceptable-use-policy/
>
> No, we did not pay attention to their
Two suggestions:
1) Run speedtest (https://www.speedtest.net) from behind your firewall
and verify your actual bandwidth (or at least get a good approximation
).
2) Check the brand of NIC in your current machine. Intel NICs are
reportedly much more efficient than RealTek for handling larg
Hello Kevin
Thanks a lot for your response.
1) Regarding the speedtest, my firewall is limiting the speed to around
6.5Gbit/s. It's a fanless device and not capable to let me use the full
10Gbit/s. I host my hardware in my living room and can't install more
powerfull, beacuse it would be too
Hello Alex
Thank you for your nice hint ot QAT_Engine.
Yes, in theory it really seems to be possible. Looking at the Github repo of
the QAT_Engine, it looks like there are still some issues with OpenSSL 3.0:
Support for QAT HW ECX, QAT SW ECX, QAT HW PRF and QAT HW HKDF is disabled when
built
