Re: [tor-relays] Improving Relay IPv6 - RIPE Grant

I am unable to see why this is a good idea actually. As someone said already, I too would be unable to provide bridges and relays thanks to my ISP (Telia) does not provide an IPv6. But removing IPv4 only nodes from the network - you are basically removing a large chunk of relays from the network wi

Re: [tor-relays] Improving Relay IPv6 - RIPE Grant

hi Johathan, this question was already addressed last week by Teor. email on this mailing list doesn't always seem to arrive in a logical sequence possible due to spam filters and so on. gr. Paul teor t...@riseup.net via lists.torproject.

Re: [tor-relays] Improving Relay IPv6 - RIPE Grant

I see a great benefit here, you could default to IPv6 for everything and enable IPv4 only as fallback that would allow to run Relays behind carrier grade NAT. I can get here 10 GBit/s symmetric but because the ISP did not get it's IP space 30 years ago (like some other ISPs which see no need fo

[tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Hi, After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay. https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F While Psychz is a bit

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:30:48 -0500 Neel Chauhan wrote: > After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for > a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run > a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay. > > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6

Re: [tor-relays] Improving Relay IPv6 - RIPE Grant

* NOC: > I see a great benefit here, you could default to IPv6 for everything > and enable IPv4 only as fallback [...] Preferring IPv6 over IPv4 is not even remotely the same as your original call to "lets drop all IPv4 only relays from consensus 2020 finally", as you wrote in message <08fee42f-f

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Consensus weight is no lo ger based on advertised bandwidth to prevent abuse. It is based on measured and observed actual throughput. -- Matt Westfall President & CIO ECAN Solutions, Inc. 804.592.1672 On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan wrote: >Hi, > >After having my Primcast

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Also you didn't migrate your fingerprint. So it's a new server and will take weeks if not months for the consensus weight to creep up. -- Matt Westfall President & CIO ECAN Solutions, Inc. 804.592.1672 On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan wrote: >Hi, > >After having my Primcas