Consensus weight is no lo ger based on advertised bandwidth to prevent abuse.
It is based on measured and observed actual throughput. -- Matt Westfall President & CIO ECAN Solutions, Inc. 804.592.1672 On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan <n...@neelc.org> wrote: >Hi, > >After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up >for >a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run > >a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay. > >https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F > >While Psychz is a bit more expensive than Primcast/ServerRoom (and that > >is with an special offer), I get a slightly faster server and far >better >customer support. > >One problem is that the consensus weight value is rather low in >proportion to the advertised bandwidth value, when they should be >approximately similar. > >In fact, my server's CPU usage never goes beyond 1%. > >Is this normal now that sbws is being deployed? Or is it bad peering on > >my relay? > >-Neel > >=== > >https://www.neelc.org/ >_______________________________________________ >tor-relays mailing list >tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
