Re: [tor-relays] Bridge clients don't *really* update dynamic bridge IPs from fingerprints?

2014-06-25 Thread Dan Thill
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:40 AM, Rick Huebner wrote: [snip] > Or maybe I'm just totally misreading this, and my own experiences of > losing all my bridge clients on each change aren't typical, but are due > to some other unknown singular issue. How about you other bridge > providers, how many

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge clients don't *really* update dynamic bridge IPs from fingerprints?

2014-06-25 Thread Rick Huebner
It may be partially related, in that I've seen it take weeks to gradually gain a new set of clients after an IP change, which is why I think it's so important to not be abandoning all your clients each time but instead let them update their bridge entries to your new address. If you've been up

Re: [tor-relays] Is my tor exit relay set up correctly?

2014-06-25 Thread I
Matt, No, I mean every ab initio Tor relay operator. >From my experience getting into Tor and from watching the list it is obvious >that there is quite often a chasm between those with the goodwill to run a >relay and those confident with Linux and Tor jargon/lexicon. Even asking questions on

[tor-relays] bitcoin adopt a node idea

2014-06-25 Thread jason
This seems pretty damn similiar to something we should be offering for Tor relays, possibly even exits and bridges (if they only run for a month at a time). Possibly co-ordinated through the EFF? http://www.coindesk.com/adopt-node-project-aims-bolster-bitcoin-network-security/ -Jason ___

Re: [tor-relays] bitcoin adopt a node idea

2014-06-25 Thread jason
Sorry perhaps I didn't explain well enough. What I was pointing to was that tor could benefit from the idea of cheaply crowd sponsored relays that use ansible, chef or puppet to spin up for a month. That the article is about bitcoin is merely coincidental. -J On 06/26/2014 05:35 AM, Scott

Re: [tor-relays] bitcoin adopt a node idea

2014-06-25 Thread Scott Bennett
ja...@icetor.is wrote: > Sorry perhaps I didn't explain well enough. What I was pointing to was > that tor could benefit from the idea of cheaply crowd sponsored relays > that use ansible, chef or puppet to spin up for a month. That the > article is about bitcoin is merely coincidental.

Re: [tor-relays] bitcoin adopt a node idea

2014-06-25 Thread Scott Bennett
ja...@icetor.is wrote: > This seems pretty damn similiar to something we should be offering for > Tor relays, possibly even exits and bridges (if they only run for a > month at a time). Possibly co-ordinated through the EFF? > > http://www.coindesk.com/adopt-node-project-aims-bolster-bitcoin-netwo