On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:07:14PM +0300, J.C. wrote:
> Another amateur relay operator here, i run the node "namelesshero"
> and I sure hope however this cost reimbursing plan eventually pans
> out, it won't discourage small folk like us from running relays. I,
> too, believe the exact opposite is
On 09/21/2013 01:48 PM, t...@t-3.net wrote:
> - If authorities can ever build a case where Tor can be accused of being
> a dirty little network which hosts criminal content and profits from it,
> it seems that it could be fucked.
That's exactly why we encourage exit operators to defend the right f
On Friday 20/09/2013 at 6:37 am, Moritz Bartl wrote:
I don't think exit relay operators are in a position to have anonymity
in the first place. It is fine if you manage to pay for and run your
relay anonymously, but I doubt it will survive more than a few LEA
inquiries where they end up wit
On 09/19/2013 12:06 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
>> reimburse via wire transfer.
>> This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
>> ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no
>> chance at anonymity
I don't think
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:29:26 -0400
t...@t-3.net wrote:
> In the context of September 2013, this whole thing is scary. It was
> perhaps not scary in September of 2012, when we didn't know anything.
Just a point that many in the tech community knew what was happening, at
some level, for the past d
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:10:25 -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
> The OP I saw said:
>
> The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
> reimburse via wire transfer.
>
> This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
> ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chan
While I believe you have a good point
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:29:26 -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
>
> Think bigger, say what?
>
> Certain of the world's biggest and most well-funded intelligence
> agencies hate personal privacy on the internet so much that they've
> been going to extreme effo
Think bigger, say what?
Certain of the world's biggest and most well-funded intelligence
agencies hate personal privacy on the internet so much that they've
been going to extreme efforts to destroy it. They are packet sniffing
the NAPs and fiber backbones to pull out everything they can, they
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:10:25AM -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
> The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
> reimburse via wire transfer.
>
> This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
> ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no
> chance at anonymity
Th
It's a little old.
Posted July 24, 2012
We knew a lot less on that date.
On Wednesday 18/09/2013 at 3:08 pm, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:36:39 -0400
Rick wrote:
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most everything is a little bit
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:36:39 -0400
Rick wrote:
> Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
> period most everything is a little bit creepy. There's plenty of FUD
> to go around. A position paper from Torproject on this and other
> recent issues would be handy about no
Another amateur relay operator here, i run the node "namelesshero" and I
sure hope however this cost reimbursing plan eventually pans out, it
won't discourage small folk like us from running relays. I, too, believe
the exact opposite is desirable instead. I'll admit i'm not quite sure
if i unde
On 09/18/2013 07:31 AM, Tom Ritter wrote:
On Sep 18, 2013 7:11 AM, mailto:t...@t-3.net>> wrote:
>
> I wonder if I am the only one who finds this creepy...
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most everything is a little bit creepy. There's plenty of
On 18 September 2013 08:10, wrote:
> The OP I saw said:
>
> The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
> reimburse via wire transfer.
>
> This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is ultimately
> getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chance at anonymity
> within
The OP I saw said:
The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
reimburse via wire transfer.
This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chance
at anonymity within our currently hacked banking system. It's not
On Sep 18, 2013 7:11 AM, wrote:
>
> I wonder if I am the only one who finds this creepy, in light of all of
the news that has come out lately about the banking systems having been
hacked, etc. This kind of thing would draw a direct line of sorts to the
bank account of the person/company involved w
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 09/18/2013 11:22 AM, Lunar wrote:
> I am not sure I fully understand to what
> extent it can be gamed. I'd be grateful for a summary. :)
You mean a tutorial? ;-)
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@list
Roger Dingledine:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:27:57PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> > The recipient share is calculated from the
> > throughput per relay * country factor
>
> It might be worthwhile to make it clearer what "throughput" is here.
>
> I hope it's not consensus weight, since that's n
On 9/18/13 2:53 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Unless maybe stem already does exactly this for us?
>
> Yup, stem parses the extrainfo descriptors...
>
> https://stem.torproject.org/api/descriptor/extrainfo_descriptor.html#stem.descriptor.extrainfo_descriptor.ExtraInfoDescriptor
>
> The only pesky
Isn't it reimbursement for running a relay?
How much Tor uses it is not directly due to the cost.
If the relay is set to be used fully as Tor might use it and is not a
particularly costly server isn't it of equal value?
FREE 3D MARINE A
> Unless maybe stem already does exactly this for us?
Yup, stem parses the extrainfo descriptors...
https://stem.torproject.org/api/descriptor/extrainfo_descriptor.html#stem.descriptor.extrainfo_descriptor.ExtraInfoDescriptor
The only pesky bit is that you'll need to download a lot of
descriptor
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:27:57PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> The recipient share is calculated from the
> throughput per relay * country factor
It might be worthwhile to make it clearer what "throughput" is here.
I hope it's not consensus weight, since that's not really a measure of
how much
Hi,
tl;dr: We want to start reimbursing exit operators end of this month.
Partner orgs, please sign the contract! Everyone else, consider becoming
a partner.
---
In July last year, Roger announced that BBG was interested in funding
fast exits. [1] The initial discussion on the mailing list contin
24 matches
Mail list logo
