The OP I saw said:
The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
reimburse via wire transfer.
This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chance
at anonymity within our currently hacked banking system. It's not
related to taxation or what organization may or may not be trusted.
It's about what information is being gathered from the system by 3rd
parties for possible use tomorrow.
There's another perspective to this as well. Speaking objectively and
without knowledge of the organization involved, and nothing personal
intended. It may be worth noting that certain presumably-Tor-hostile
and well-funded agencies are known to infiltrate the tech
organizations/efforts which they wish to weaken, and influence them
from the inside. In this context, seeing Tor's exit node operators
being offered cash via bank transfer is waist-deep into creepy.
On Wednesday 18/09/2013 at 7:38 am, Tom Ritter wrote:
create or work with a trusted organization who is willing to shoulder
liability, risk, and expense of investigating the legality and tax
consequences, and then actually executing, reimbursing people through
anonymous means.It's not easy. May not even be possible. But there is
a rigid but not inflexible framework of tax law that must be worked
within.
IMO, this is net gain. Excited to see it happen, and congrats to all
whose hard work has brought it here.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
