On 12/11/2016 1:43 PM, Rana wrote:
>> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote:
>>
>> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me
>> [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ]
>>
>> The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that
>> arm actually means K
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 08:43, Rana wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote:
>>>
>>> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me
>>> [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ]
>>>
>>> The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote:
>
> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me
> [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ]
>
> The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that
> arm actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec when it wri
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote:
>
> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me [even
> though I "lack programming skills" :) ]
>
> The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that arm
> actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec when it wr
OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me [even though
I "lack programming skills" :) ]
The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that arm
actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec when it writes Kb/s
I have arm reporting average of at least sev
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 00:08, Rana wrote:
>
>>> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote:
>>>
>>> My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are
>>> inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are:
>>> Atlas “advertised” (which is actually supposed to be “measured”?: 10
>> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote:
>>
>> My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are
>> inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are:
>> Atlas “advertised” (which is actually supposed to be “measured”?: 100 KB/s
>> = ~ 800,
> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote:
>
> My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are
> inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are:
>
>
> Atlas “advertised” (which is actually supposed to be “measured”?: 100 KB/s
> = ~ 80
My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are
inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are:
Atlas "advertised" (which is actually supposed to be "measured"?: 100 KB/s
= ~ 800,000 bit/s
"I have sent" reported in Tor log: on the averag
