On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Like I noted in my reply to Paul S. if there was a way to
> measure/quantify trust, or deal with the "people's Guards just
I'd agree that randomly handing off nodes is bad.
And that there may be cases where structured handoff
among operators
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:03:31 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> I have decided to spin up some more servers, and this should postpone
> the need to turn off any of the relays by at least 3 weeks (at the
> cost of an increased burn-rate, i.e. now they all will expire sooner
> and "all at once").
Ok. Ha
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:32:17 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
> isis wrote:
>
> > I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to good use!
>
> Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
Hello,
I have decided to spin up some more servers, and this
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:14:00 -0400
Paul Syverson wrote:
> I've been following this thread but haven't had time (and won't for
> several days at least) to formulate a thorough thoughtful response,
> but your statements are too absolute and without qualification.
I used strong wording because there
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 08:41:13AM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:13:44 +0500
> Roman Mamedov wrote:
> > Either way you won't do much damage even if any of this ends up being
> > false, as the consensus weight and the stable status will drop more
> > rapidly than they are gat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> What was knee-jerk about my response?
I found it also unnecessarily sharp, maybe because I assumed no
malicious intent and I don't believe malicious actors depend on such
'pre-warmed' key offers anyway.
> The relay identity key is sensitive crypt
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:13:44 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Either way you won't do much damage even if any of this ends up being
> false, as the consensus weight and the stable status will drop more
> rapidly than they are gathered if your node can't maintain them.
Giving away the identity keys fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/25/2015 7:13 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 01:35:10 + Yawning Angel
> wrote:
>
>> The relay identity key is sensitive cryptographic material.
>> Sharing it means the private key is compromised and is an attempt
>> to subvert
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 01:35:10 +
Yawning Angel wrote:
> The relay identity key is sensitive cryptographic material. Sharing it
> means the private key is compromised and is an attempt to subvert:
> * The bandwidth scanning process. The consensus weight is the relay's
>capacity relative
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:32:17 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
> isis wrote:
>
> > I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to
> > good use!
>
> Hello,
>
> Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
>
> As for other repliers, I would not mind ex
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
isis wrote:
> I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to good use!
Hello,
Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
As for other repliers, I would not mind explaining my reasoning in more detail,
if you have any specific questions or more a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/25/2015 08:40 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
> it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
> month for the whole "unmeasured re
Roman Mamedov transcribed 3.6K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
> it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
> month for the whole "unmeasured relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to
> complete) or if yo
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:40:10 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay
> and want it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple
> of weeks to a month for the whole "unmeasured
> relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to complete) o
Hello,
If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
month for the whole "unmeasured relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to
complete) or if you are having trouble with your current relay being
15 matches
Mail list logo
